Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Looking Forward to Sociable Robots

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work examines humanoid social robots in Japan and the North America with a view to comparing and contrasting the projects cross culturally. In North America, I look at the work of Cynthia Breazeal at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her sociable robot project: Kismet. In Japan, at the Osaka University, I consider the project of Hiroshi Ishiguro: Repliée-Q2. I first distinguish between utilitarian and affective social robots. Then, drawing on published works of Breazeal and Ishiguro I examine the proposed vision of each project. Next, I examine specific characteristics (embodied and social intelligence, morphology and aesthetics, and moral equivalence) of Kismet and Repliée with a view to comparing the underlying concepts associated with each. These features are in turn connected to the societal preconditions of robots generally. Specifically, the role that history of robots, theology/spirituality, and popular culture plays in the reception and attitude toward robots is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kismet. Available at: http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/humanoid-robotics-group/kismet/kismet.html. Accessed March 2008

  2. Alford P (2007) In search of the perfect tin. In: The Australian, July 4:23

  3. Anderson A (2007) Interview: The shape of android robots to come. N Sci 195(2614):46–47

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartneck C (2005) Cultural differences in attitudes toward robots. In: Proceedings of the symposium on robot companions: Hard problems and open challenges in HRI, 2005. AISB’05 Convention, Hatfield, UK, April 12–15, 2005. The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, The University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bedini S (1964) The role of automata in the history of technology. Technol Cult 5(1):24–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berg A-J, Lie M (1995) Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender? Sci, Technol Hum Values 20(3):332–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilbija K (1994) Rosario Ferre’s “The youngest doll”: On women, dolls, golems and cyborgs. Callaloo 17(3):878–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Breazeal C (2002) Designing sociable robots. Intelligent robots and autonomous agents. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Breazeal C (2003) Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 29:119–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Breazeal C (2003) Toward sociable robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:167–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Breazeal C, Scassellati B (1999) How to build robots that make friends and influence people. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS ’99. Kyongju, South Korea, October 17–21, 1999. IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 858–863

    Google Scholar 

  12. Breazeal C, Scassellati B (2000) Infant-like social interactions between a robot and a human caregiver. Adapt Behav 8(1):49–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Breazeal C, Velasquez J (1999) Robot in society: Friend or appliance? In: Proceedings of agents ’99 workshop on emotion based architectures, Seattle, Washington, 1999, pp 18–26

  14. Calverley D (2006) Android science and animal rights, does an analogy exist? Connect Sci 18(4):403–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang-Won L (2007) South Korea draws up code of ethics for robots. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2007/08/06/afx3992827.html. Accessed August 2008

  16. Chapuis A, Droz E (1958) Automata: A historical and technological study. Neuchatel, Switzerland

  17. Cohen J (1967) Human robots in myth and science. AS Barnes, South Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coleman KG (2001) Android arete: Toward a virtue ethic for computational agents. Eth Inf Technol 3:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dautenhahn K, Billard A (2002) Proceedings of the 1st Cambridge workshop on universal access and assistive technology. In: 1st Cambridge workshop on universal access and assistive technology, London, March 2002

  20. de Solla Price D (1964) Automata and the origins of mechanism and mechanistic philosophy. Technol Cult 5(1):9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Doherty G (2007) Rise of the machines [Newspaper Database]. May 16, 2007. Available at: http://www.independent.ie/unsorted/features/rise-of-the-machines-677434.html. Accessed December 2008

  22. Dwyer M (2006) Monster mash is out of this world. In: The Age:4

  23. Floridi L, Sanders JW (2001) Artificial evil and the foundation of computer ethics. Ethics Info Technol 3:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Foucault M (1995) Discipline and punish: Birth of the prison. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fryer D, Marshall J (1979) The motives of Jacques de Vaucanson. Technol Cult 20(2):257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Geraci R (2006) Spiritual robots: Religion and our scientific view of the natural world. Theol Sci 4(3):229–246

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Gips J (1995) Towards the ethical robot. In: Ford K (eds) Android epistemology. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, pp 243–252

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gonzalez J (2000) Envisioning cyborg bodies: Notes from current research. In: Kirkup G (eds) The gendered cyborg: A reader. Routledge in association with the Open University, London, pp 58–73

    Google Scholar 

  29. Graham E (1999) Cyborgs or goddesses? Becoming divine in a cyberfeminist age. Inf Commun Soc 2(4):419–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Habershon E, Woods R (2006) No sex please, robot, just clean the floor. In: Sunday Times, June 18, 2006:11

  31. Hanafi Z (2000) The monster in the machine: Magic, medicine, and the marvelous in the time of the scientific revolution. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  32. Haraway D (1991) Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Free Association Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harvey LSC (1994) Mr. Jefferson’s wolf: Slavery and the suburban robot. J Am Cult 17(4):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hayles NK (1999) How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heerink M et al (2008) Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 113–120

  36. Hornyak T (2006) Loving the machine: The art and science of Japanese robots. Kodansha International, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ishiguro H (2006) Android science: Conscious and subconscious recognition. Connect Sci 18(4):319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ishiguro H (2007) Android science: Toward a new cross-interdisciplinary framework. Robot Res 28:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ishiguro H (2009) Androids. Available at: http://www.ed.ams.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp/research/0007/. Accessed November 1, 2007

  40. Johnstone B (1999) Japan’s friendly robots. Tech Rev 102(3):64–69

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kahn P (2004) Social and moral relationships with robotic others? In: Proceedings of the 13th international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN ’04. Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan, September 20–22, 2004. IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 545–550

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kaplan F (2004) Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. Int J Hum Robot 1(3):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kunzri H (1997) You are cyborg: Interview with Donna Haraway [Online Magazine]. Available at: www.wired.com/wired/archive//5.02/ffharaway.html?person=donna_haraway&topic_set=wiredpeople. Accessed December 20, 2004

  44. Levy D (2007) Love + sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. MacDorman K, Ishiguro H (2006) The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interact Stud 7(3):297–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. MacDorman K et al (2005) Assessing human likeness by eye contact in an android testbed. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Stresa, Italy, September 21–23, 2005

  47. Mori M (1999) The Buddha in the robot: A robot engineer’s thoughts on science and religion. Kosei Publishing Co, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nass C (1997) Computers are social actors: A review of current research. In: Friedman B (ed) Human values and the design of computer technology. CSLI Press, Stanford, pp 137–162

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nerlich B (2001) Fictions, fantasies, and fears: The literary foundations of the cloning debate. J Lit Semant 30:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nickerson C (2007) With robotic bugs, larger ethical questions: Advances affect ties of human, machine. In: The Boston Globe, November 16:A1

  52. Pate AS, Gardiner L (2005) Ningyo: The art of the Japanese doll. Tuttle Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  53. Penley C, Ross A (1990) Cyborgs at large: Interview with Donna Haraway. Soc Text 25(26):8–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Plank R (1965) The golem and the robot. Lit Psychol 15(1):12–28

    Google Scholar 

  55. Riskin J (2003) The defecating duck, or, the ambiguous origins of artificial life. Crit Inq 29:599–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Riskin J (2003) Eighteenth-century wetware. Represent 83:97–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Robertson J (2007) Robo sapiens japanicus: Humanoid robots and the posthuman family. Crit Asian Stud 39(3):369–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shaw-Garlock GR (2006) Descartes’ daughters: Monstrous machine-women through time. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shelley M (1983) Frankenstein: Or, the modern Prometheus. Penguin, New York. First published 1818

    Google Scholar 

  60. Stork D, O’Connell M (2001) Emotional intelligence: Cynthia Breazeal interview. Available at: http://www.2001halslegacy.com/interviews/braezeal.html. Accessed March 3, 2008

  61. Tabori P (1969) The humor and technology of sex. Julian Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  62. Telotte JP (2004) Human artifice and the science fiction film. In: Redmond S (ed) Liquid metal. Wallflower Press, London, pp 57–63. First published 1983

    Google Scholar 

  63. Thomson E (2001) MIT team building social robot. Available at: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2001/kismet.html. Accessed March 20

  64. Turkle S (1984) The second self: Computers and the human spirit. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  65. Turkle S (1995) Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  66. Turkle S (2006) Encounters with kismet and cog: Children respond to relational artifacts. In: Messaris P, Humphreys L (eds) Digital media: Transformations in human communication. Peter Lang, New York, pp 313–330

    Google Scholar 

  67. Turkle S (2006) Relational artifacts with children and elders: The complexities of cybercompanionship. Connect Sci 18(4):347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Turney J (1998) Frankenstein’s footsteps: Science, genetics and popular culture. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  69. Veruggio G (2006) Euron roboethics roadmap. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, Genoa, Italy, December 4–6, 2006, pp 612–617

  70. Wessels MG (1990) The human use of human beings. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wilson D (2006) Rise of the robot. In: The Age, November 9:4

  73. Wolfe A (1991) Mind, self, society and computer: Artificial intelligence and the sociology of mind. Am J Sociol 96(5):1073–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wood G (2002) Living dolls: A magical history of the quest for mechanical life. Faber and Faber, London

    Google Scholar 

  75. Woods S et al (2004) The design space of robots: Investigating children’s views. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, ROMAN, Okayama, Japan, September 20–22, 2004, pp 47–52

  76. Yoon-Mi K (2007) Korea drafts robot ethics charter. [Online Newspaper] April 28, 2007. Available at: www.koreaherald.co.kr. Accessed March, 2008

  77. Zhao S (2006) Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication. New Media Soc 8(3):401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Communication, Faculty of Comunication, Arts & Technology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada

    Glenda Shaw-Garlock

Authors
  1. Glenda Shaw-Garlock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenda Shaw-Garlock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw-Garlock, G. Looking Forward to Sociable Robots. Int J of Soc Robotics 1, 249–260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0021-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0021-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation