Skip to main content
Log in

Water Productivity of Sugarcane Influenced by Planting Techniques, Mulching and Irrigation Scheduling in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugarcane is one of the most suitable alternative crops to predominant rice–wheat cropping system in indo-Gangetic plains of India. However, grand growth period of this crop coincides with hot and dry summer months having higher evaporative demands which raise the crop water requirement during this period, thus narrowing its scope of being an alternative to rice–wheat cropping system. To enhance water productivity of sugarcane field, experiments were conducted at Punjab Agricultural University, Regional Research Stations, Faridkot and Kapurthala during spring 2016, 2017 and 2018 on planting methods and irrigation scheduling. Four planting methods comprised of P1: conventional flat (75 cm apart) with mulching @ 6 ha−1, P2: conventional flat without mulch, P3: paired row trench planting (30:120 cm) with mulch and P4: paired row trench planting without mulch as main plots and three irrigation schedules, i.e., irrigation at 0.60, 0.80 and 1.00 IW/CPE as subplots factors in split plot design. The results revealed that paired row trench planting (30:120 cm) with mulch @ 6 t ha−1 resulted into 162% and 123% higher apparent water productivity than conventional flat planted crop without mulch at Faridkot and Kapurthala, respectively. In paired row trench planting, irrigation water application was 58.4% and 52.0% lesser than conventional flat planted crop at Faridkot and Kapurthala, respectively, as water was applied only in trenches which actually curtailed the wettable area to 40%. Mulching in conventional flat planted crop improved the cane yield by 10.3% over non-mulch flat planted crop at Kapurthala, but this difference was only 6.1% in paired row trench planted crop at Faridkot. At Kapurthala, mulching in paired row trench planted crop enhanced the cane yield by 8.8%, but in conventional flat planted crop, this increase was up to 6.9%. On the basis of these results, it can be concluded that the planting sugarcane in paired row trench planting system with mulch @ 6 t ha−1 is the most viable planting system in sugarcane to attain higher crop and water productivity. Based on the availability of irrigation water, crop can either be irrigated at 0.6 or 0.8 IW/CPE for higher total and apparent water productivity and higher water-use efficiency. Higher benefit/cost ratio (mean over locations) is obtained under paired row trench planting with mulch and irrigation scheduling at 0.8 IW/CPE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhtar, S.A., M.A. Wahid, and E. Rausl. 2001. Some growth, photosynthetic and anatomical attributes of sugarcane genotypes under NaCl salinity. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 3: 439–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 2016. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), FAOSTATS. http://faostat.fao.org

  • Aquino, G.S., M. Costa, D.C.M. Shahab, C.C. Medina, and A.D. Santiago. 2017. Sugarcane straw management and its impact on production and development of ratoons. Industrial Crops and Products 102: 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C.B., H. Tiessen, J.W.B. Stewart, I.H. Salcedo, and E.V.S.B. Sampaio. 1993. Residue management effects on sugarcane yield and soil properties in North-eastern Brazil. Agronomy Journal 85 (5): 1004–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhullar, M.S., K.S. Thind, S. Uppal, and K. Singh. 2008. Productivity, profitability and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum spp) plant-ratoon system in relation to planting methods and seeding rate. Indian Journal of Agronomy 53 (3): 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunbeck, O.A., and P.S.G. Magalhaes. 2010. Technological evaluation of mechanization of sugarcane. In: Bioethanol from Sugarcane: R & D to Productivity and Sustainability. Sugarcane: R & D to Productivity and Sustainability, ed. L.A.B Cortez, Blucher, 556. São Paulo.

  • Camargo, M.S., B.K.L. Bezerra, A.C. Vitti, M.A. Silva, and A.L. Oliveira. 2017. Silicon fertilization reduces the deleterious effects of water deficit in sugarcane. Journal Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 17: 99–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M.K.V., and J.W. Knox. 2011. The water relations and irrigation requirement of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum): A review. Experimental Agriculture 47: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitodkar, S.S., P.M. Chaudhari, H.E. Patil, and P.U. Raundal. 2006. Studies on irrigation regimes, mulches and antitranspirant on yield and water requirement of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2: 496–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beer, A.G., C. Hudson, E. Meyer, and B. Seigmund. 1995. Green cane harvesting and trash management. Proceedings: International Society of Sugar Cane Technology. 22: 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmead, O.T., C.L. Mayocchi, and F.X. Dunin. 1997. Does green cane harvesting conserve soil water? Proceedings: Conference Australian Society of Sugar Technology. 19: 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., R.L. Yadav, and S.R. Prasad. 2004. Comparison of planting methods and irrigation techniques for water use efficiency, yield and juice quality of sugarcane in semiarid subtropics of India. Indian Journal Sugarcane Technology 19: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katiyar, A.K., B.B. Singh, and R. Dixit. 2013. Increase productivity of sugarcane by trench method planting along with SSNM techniques. The Journal of Rural and Agricultural Research 13: 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, G., J.L. Donzelli, J.H. Meyer, E.P. Richard, S.S. Ruttun, J. Torres, and A.R. Van. 2005. Impact of green cane harvest and production system on the agronomy of sugarcane. Proceedings: International Society of Sugar Cane Technology 25: 184–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumavat, P.D., D.J. Kacha, and N.U. Dahima. 2016. Effect of crop geometry and drip irrigation levels on sugarcane in south Saurashtra region of India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 366–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, M., and S.K. Shukla 2000. Production practices for sugarcane. In 50 Years of Sugarcane Research in India, ed. Shahi, H.N., Srivastava, A.K., and Sinha, OK, India.

  • Olivier, F., and A. Singels. 2003. Water use efficiency of irrigated sugarcane as affected by row spacing and variety. Proceeding: South African Sugarcane Association 7: 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhakar, K., K.G. Sagar, S.M. Chari, K.K.C. Reddy, and C.S. Sekhar. 2014. Effect of planting geometry and nitrogen application through fertigation on production and quality of sugarcane. Agricultural Science Digest 34: 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prem, G., R. Kumar, V.D. Singh, A. Kumar, R. Choudhary, and A. Ahmad. 2017. Effect of planting methods on cane yield, water productivity and economics of spring planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) in Ambala (Harayana). International J Agricultural Engineering 10: 186–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, B. 2018. Current status of sugarcane agriculture in major cane growing states in India. In: Best Management Practices for Sustained Sugarcane Productivity, ed. T. Rajula Shanthy and Bakshi Ram, 1–8. ISBN 9789385267130.

  • Singh, I. 2012. Optimizing irrigation schedule in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) under different planting methods in sub-tropical India. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 27: 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., and A.S. Brar. 2015. Effect of planting methods and irrigation schedules on cane yield, quality, economics and water productivity of spring sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) in South Western Punjab. Indian Journal of Agronomy 60: 601–605.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P.N., and S.C. Mohan. 1994. Water use and yield response of sugarcane under different irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels in a subtropical region. Agricultural Water Management 26: 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G., L. Kumar, S. Chandra, A. Bhatnagar, and K.P. Raverkar. 2015. Response of summer planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) to tillage practices and planting methods. Madras Agricultural Journal 102: 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S. 2012. Cost-effective and input efficient technologies for productivity enhancement in sugarcane. In 25th meeting of sugarcane research and development workers, 1–10. India: Visakhapatnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimmegowda, P., and T.E. Nagaraja. 2019. Scheduling of irrigation with mulch under different sugarcane planting methods. In International Conference on Water Resource and Environmental Engineering (ICWREE), 117.

  • Uwah, D.F., and G.A. Iwo. 2011. Effectiveness of organic mulch on the productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) and weed growth. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 21: 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuldeep Singh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, K., Pal, R., Chalotra, N. et al. Water Productivity of Sugarcane Influenced by Planting Techniques, Mulching and Irrigation Scheduling in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Sugar Tech 24, 408–418 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01041-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01041-y

Keywords

Navigation