Skip to main content
Log in

Commercial Scale Micropropagation of Sugarcane: Constraints and Remedies

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tissue culture techniques are now becoming important tools of crop improvement and rapid multiplication of selected clones. There has been considerable interest in applying these techniques in breeding, propagation, disease elimination, rejuvenation of older varieties, development of clones suitable for abiotic and biotic stresses, conservation of genetic resources etc. In vitro micropropagation is now drawing special attention for multiplication of new varieties on large scale in comparatively shorter period of time in several crops including sugarcane. Despite several advantages of applying micropropagation technique in sugarcane such as quick multiplication of newly released varieties; rejuvenation of old deteriorated varieties; production of disease free seed; easy transportation of seed material; elimination of viruses; high cane productivity and sugar yield etc., this technique is not gaining popularity up to the desired extent. There are several constraints like microbial contamination, phenolics secretion from cultured explants, shoot vitrification, thin canes in tissue culture raised crops, high cost of production and appearance of some variants in micropropagated population. The present article describes some of the problems encountered during in vitro micropropagation of sugarcane on commercial scale. Though some problems have now been resolved to considerable extents which have been described in this review. However, some constraints still require intensive research work to be resolved so that a safe and efficient exploitation of this technique can be ensured in sugarcane seed production programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bastiaens, L., J. Maene, Y. Harrasui, C. Van Sumere, K.I. Van de K.I, and P.C. Debergh. 1983. The influence of antibacterial products on plant tissue culture. Mededelingen Van de Faculteit Landbouwettenchaften Rijk Universiteit Gent 48: 13–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, J. 1988. Micropropagation plantlet project: Laboratory production, nursery operations and field aspects. In Hawaiian sugar technologists’ 47th annual conference reports, Honolulu, Hawaii, A38–39.

  • Constantine, D.R. 1986. Micropropagation in commercial environment. In Plant tissue culture and its agricultural applications, ed. L.A. Withers, and P.G. Alderson, 175–186. London: Butterworths.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Debergh, P.C., and P.E. Read. 1991. Micropropagation. In Micropropagation technology and application, ed. P.C. Deberg, and R.H. Zimmerman, 1–13. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, N.S., P. Suprasanna, and V.A. Bapat. 2004. Simple and reproducible protocol for direct somatic embryogenesis from cultures immature inflorescence segments of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Current Science 87(6): 764–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devarumath, R.M., S. Nandy, V. Rani, S. Marimuthu, N. Muraleedharan, and S.N. Raina. 2002. RAPD, ISSR and RFLP fingerprints as useful markers to evaluate genetic integrity of diploid and triploid elite tea clones representing Camellia sinensis China type and C. assamica spp. Assam type. Plant Cell Reports 21: 166–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devarumath, R.M., R.B. Doule, P.G. Kawar, S.B. Naikebawane, and Y.S. Nerker. 2007. Field performance and RAPD analysis to evaluate genetic fidelity of tissue culture raised plants vis-à-vis conventional setts derived plants of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 91: 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukoon, A., M. Moutia, K. Mulleegadoo, and L.J.C. Autrey. 1995. Constraints in sugarcane micropropagation by tissue culture. In Proceedings of 22nd conference of the international society of sugar cane technologists, Cartagena, Colombia, 434–440.

  • Evans, D.A., W.R. Sharp, and H.P. Medina-Filho. 1984. Somaclonal and gametoclonal variation. American Journal of Botany 716: 759–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, P.L. Ferecol, and P. Rott. 1989. In vitro culture, a new tool for agricultural progress in Guadeloupe. 2nd Sugarcane Bulletin Agronomique 9: 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, D.J., and G.W.P. Mee. 1971. Morphological and enzymatic variation in Saccharum species hybrid clones from callus tissue. American Journal of Botany 58: 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, D.J., G.W.P. Mee, and L.G. Nickell. 1969. Chromosome numbers of some Saccharum species hybrids and their cell suspension cultures. American Journal of Botany 56: 450–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendre, R.R., R.S. Iyer, M. Kotwal, S.S. Khupse, and A.F. Mascarenhas. 1983. Rapid multiplication of sugarcane by tissue culture. Sugarcane 1: 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendre, R.R., A.F. Mascarenhas, A.L. Nadgir, M. Pathak, and V. Jagnnathan. 1975. Growth of mosaic virus free sugarcane plants from apical meristems. Indian Phytopathology 282: 175–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E.B. 1997. Non-axenic plant tissue culture: possibilities and opportunities ISHS. Acta Horticulturae 280: 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsch, R.B., and J. King. 1983. A covert contamination of cultured plant cells: elimination of a Hyphomicrobium sp. from cultures of Datura innoxia Mill. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 2: 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, G. 1986. Problems and prospects in the in vitro propagation of herbaceous plants. In Plant tissue culture and its agric. Applications, ed. L.A. Withers, and P.G. Alderson, 69–84. London: Butterworths.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jalaja, N.C., T.V. Sreenivasan, S.M. Pawar, P.G. Bhoi, and R.M. Garker. 2006. Co 94012- a new sugarcane variety through somaclonal variation. Sugar Tech 82(3): 132–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalaja, N.C., D. Neelamathi, T.V. Sreenivasan, T.V. 2008. Micropropagation for quality seed production in sugarcane in Asia and the Pacific. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome. Asia-Pacific consortium on agricultural biotechnology, New Delhi. Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions, 46, Bangkok.

  • Johnson, R.T. 1980. Gamma irradiation and in vitro induced separation of chimera genotypes in carnation. Horticulture Science 15: 605–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krikorian, A.D., K. Kelly, and D.L. Smith. 1988. Hormones in tissue culture and micropropagation. Plant hormones and their role in plant growth and development, 593–613. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan, P., R.J. Geijskes, K.S. Aitken, C.L.P. Grof, G.D. Bonnett, and G.R. Smith. 2005. Sugarcane biotechnology: The challenges and opportunities. In Vitro Cell Development Biology Plant 41: 345–363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, J., H.P. Pande, and S.K. Awasthi. 1995. A high frequency and wide spectrum of somatic variations through direct in vitro regeneration in sugarcane. Indian Journal Sugarcane Technology 10(2): 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, N., and R.G. Singh. 1994. Rapid clonal multiplication of sugarcane through tissue culture. Plant Tissue Culture 4: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, M., N. Singh, G.P. Rao, and S.B. Singh. 2008a. Developments in micropropagation of sugarcane. In Advances in plant biotechnology, ed. G.P. Rao, Yipeng Zhou, V.V. Radchuk, and S.K. Bhatnagar, 343–366. Texas, USA: Studium Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, M., R.K. Singh, S. Srivastava, N. Singh, S.P. Singh, and M.L. Sharma. 2008b. RAPD marker based analysis of micropropagated plantlets of sugarcane for early evaluation of genetic fidelity. Sugar Tech 10: 99–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J., and W.R. Scowcroft. 1981. Somaclonal variation—a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theoretical Applied Genetics 60: 197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.S.G. 1987. Micropropagation of sugarcane Saccharum spp. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 10: 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leifert, C., J. Ritchie, and Y.W.M. Waites. 1991. Contaminants of plant-tissue and cell cultures. World Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology 74: 452–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshem, B. 1990. Somaclonal variation in carnations. In Biotechnology in agriculture and foresty 11, ed. Y.P.S. Bajaj, 573–585. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M.C., and W.H. Chen. 1976. Tissue and cell culture as aids to sugarcane breeding. I. Creation of genetic variation through callus culture. Euphytica 25: 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcotrigiano, M., P.A. Morgan, H.J. Swartz, and J. Ruth. 1987. Histogenic instability in tissue culture proliferated strawberry plants. Journal of American Society Horticulture Science 112: 583–587.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maretzki, A. 1987. Tissue culture: Its prospects and problems. In Sugarcane improvement through breeding, ed. D.J. Heinz, 343–384. Amsterdam. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., D. Singh, A.K. Tiwari, M. Lal, and G.P. Rao. 2010. Elimination of sugarcane mosaic virus and sugarcane streak mosaic virus by tissue culture. Sugarcane International. 283: 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, P.H. 1987. Application of new plant biotechnology for the improvement of sugarcane. Proc Haw. Sugarcane Technology 46: A59–A62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. 1974. Plant propagation through tissue cultures. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 25: 135–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • North, J.J., P.A. Ndakidemi, and C.P. Laubscher. 2012. Effects of antioxidants, plant growth regulators and wounding on phenolic compound excretion during micropropagation of Strelitzia reginae. International Journal Physical Science 74: 638–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierik, R.L.M., and H.H.M. Steegmans. 1983. Vegetative propagation of a chimeral Yucca elephantipes Regal in vitro. Science Horticulture 21: 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poethig, R.S. 1987. Clonal analysis of cell lineage patterns in plant development. American Journal of Botany 74: 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preil, W., and M. Engelhardt. 1982. In vitro separation of chimeras by suspension culture of Euphorbia pulcherrima Wild. Gartenbouwissenschaft 47: 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeswari, S., S. Thirugnanakumar, K. Anandan, and M. Krishnamurthi. 2009. Somaclonal variation in sugarcane through tissue culture and evaluation for quantitative and quality traits. Euphytica 681: 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanand, and M. Lal. 2004. An efficient protocol for in vitro micropropagation of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 61: 85–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, V., A. Parida, and S.N. Raina. 1995. Random amplified polymorphic DNA RAPD markers for genetic analysis on micropropagated plants of Populus deltoids Marsh. Plant Cell Reports 14: 459–462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, P., D. Gagglioni, and L. Giunchi. 1986. Genetic stability in micropro-pagated loganberry plants. Journal of Horticulture Science 61: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvaire, D., and R. Glazy. 1978. Multiplication vegetative de la canne a sucre Saccharum sp. par bouturage in vitro. Comptes Rendus De L’ Academic Des Sciences, Ser. 3 287: 467–470.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sawant, A., and P. Tawar. 2011. Use of sodium hypochlorite as media sterilant in sugarcane micropropagation at commercial scale. Sugar Tech 131: 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, R., A.Q. Khan, and S.K. Garg. 1994. In vitro clonal propagation of sugarcane: Optimization of media and hardening of plants. Sugarcane 4: 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.B., M. Lal, Ramanand, and N. Shubhanand. 2006. Raising breeder seed nursery of sugarcane through tissue culture technique. All India seminar on efficient practices in sugarcane, 25th March, 2006, 113–118. Shahjahanpur: UPCSR.

  • Skene, K.G.M., and M. Barlass. 1983. Studies of the fragmented shoot apex of grapewine. IV. Separation of phenotypes in a periclinal chimera in vitro. Journal of Experimental Botany 34: 1271–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, J., T.V. Sreenivasan, K.C. Alexander, and M. Rao. 1987. Somaclonal variation for smut disease Ustilago scitaminea Syd. resistance in sugarcane. In Proc. symp. plant cell and tissue culture of economically important plants, ed. G.M. Reddy, 259–264. Hyderabad.

  • Sreenivasan, T.V., and J. Sreenivasan. 1992. Micropropagation of sugarcane varieties for increasing cane yield. SISSTA Sugar Journal 14: 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, T.V., and N.C. Jalaja. 1995. Utility of tissue culture technology in sugarcane improvement. Application of bio-technology for sustainable sugarcane production, 44th annual convention DSTA, 1–9. Pune.

  • Suprasanna, P., Y.V. Patade, and V.A. Bapat. 2007. Sugarcane biotechnology—A perspective on recent developments and emerging opportunities. In Advances in plant biotechnology, ed. G.P. Rao, Yipeng Zhao, V.R. Volodymyr, and S.K. Bhatnagar, 313–342. Hauppauge, NY: Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.W.J. 1994. Tissue culture techniques for developing disease resistance in sugarcane. In Current trends in sugarcane pathology, eds. G.P. Rao, Gillaspi, Jr. P.P. Upadhyaya, A. Bergamin, V.P. Agnihotri, and C.T. Chen, 311–331. Delhi: Intl. books periodicals and supply service.

  • Tiwari, A.K., S. Tripathi, M. Lal, M.L. Sharma, and P. Chiemsombat. 2011a. Elimination of sugarcane phytoplasma through apical meristem culture. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 4420: 1942–1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, A.K., N. Mishra, S. Tripathi, M. Lal, R.K. Singh, and M.L. Sharma. 2011b. Assessment of genetic stability in micropropagated population of sugarcane variety CoS 07250 through SSR markers. Vegetos 242: 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, A.K., S. Tripathi, M. Lal, and S. Mishra. 2012. Screening of some chemical disinfectants for media sterilization during in vitro micropropagation of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 14(4): 364–369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visessuwan, R., P. Chiemsombat, K. Naritoom, and M. Surijachaijakorn. 1995. Effects of growth regulators on production of virus free sugarcane. In Proceedings of XXI ISSCT congress Vol. 2, 145–155. Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Walkey, D.G.A. 1980. Production of virus free plants by tissue culture. In Tissue culture methods for plant pathologists, eds. D.S. Ingram and J.P. Helgeson, 109–117. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

  • Williams, J.G., A.R. Kubelik, K.J. Livak, J.A. Rafalski, and S.V. Tingey. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18(22): 6531–6535.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman, M.M. 1986. The present development and future of plant cell and tissue culture in agriculture, forestry and horticulture. In Plant tissue culture and its agric. Applications, eds. L.A. Withers and P.G. Alderson, 489–500. London: Butterworths.

  • Ziv, M. 1986. In vitro hardening and acclimatization of tissue culture plants. In Plant tissue culture and its agric. applications, eds. L.A. Withers and P.G. Alderson, 187–196. London: Butterworths.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Tiwari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lal, M., Tiwari, A.K., Gupta, G.N. et al. Commercial Scale Micropropagation of Sugarcane: Constraints and Remedies. Sugar Tech 17, 339–347 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-014-0345-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-014-0345-y

Keyword

Navigation