Skip to main content
Log in

Labour Scarcity and Selective Mechanisation of Sugarcane Agriculture in Tamil Nadu, India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cultural operations for sugarcane production are arduous especially planting, irrigation and harvesting. In the recent past, labour scarcity coupled with high labour wage rate greatly affected the irrigation and harvesting of the crop in time. It has reduced sugarcane area from 3.91 lakh ha 2006–2007 to 3.14 lakh ha in 2009–2010 at Tamil Nadu. Modern sugarcane machinery and labour saving devices were introduced at large scale to reduce the dependency of labour, and complete the farm operation in time. Mechanical operations proved that it was superior to manual operations. It reduced cost of production and enable efficient utilization of resources with better work output. For e.g. Furrow method of irrigation requires about 320 man-hour as against drip irrigation requires of only 30 man-hours. Manual harvesting required about 1,000 man hour with the cost of Rs 55,000 to harvest 100 t/ha (Rs 550/tonne) against Rs 32,500/ha (Rs 325/t) with the labour engagement of 12 man-hours/ha. Now it is inevitable to use modern sugarcane machinery, which is now available in the-country like sugarcane planters weeding machinery and imported harvesters. Although their initial cost is very high but advantages accrued in their use are much more. There is an enormous need to use drip irrigation and mechanical harvesters to mitigate acute labour scarcity (farm operation and harvesting). Custom hiring system on co-operative basis/or owned and operated by sugar factories of sugarcane harvesters should also be implemented (1US $ = 54 IN Rs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. 2011. NFCSF (National Federation of Cooperative Sugar Factories Ltd). Sugar statistics Co-operative Sugar 46: 65–90.

  • Anonymous. 2001. AUSTOFT 7000 Sugarcane chopper harvester (No. CIAE/NATP/AMD/254) Published in April 2001, at CIAE Bhopal.

  • Murali, P., and K. Hari. 2011. Bio-fuel market scenario in India. Sugarcane Technology 13(4): 394–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vachaparampil, M. 1999. Economic analysis of harvester. Proceedings ISSCT 23: 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.N.S., S. Yadav, and Tejra Raj Kumar. 2003. Labour saving and cost reduction machinery for sugarcane cultivation. Sugarcane Technology 1–2: 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.N.S., D. Chaudhuri. 2001. Overview of sugarcane mechanization and role of NATP for development and popularization of sugarcane machinery. Paper, National Seminar-cum-Workshop on Mechanization of Sugarcane Production in India, CIAE, 16 Sept 1–12.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Murali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murali, P., Balakrishnan, R. Labour Scarcity and Selective Mechanisation of Sugarcane Agriculture in Tamil Nadu, India. Sugar Tech 14, 223–228 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0153-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0153-1

Keywords

Navigation