Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coronary vasomotor dysfunction portends worse outcomes in patients with breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Impaired MFR in the absence of flow-limiting CAD is associated with adverse events. Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with breast cancer. We sought to test the utility of MFR to predict outcomes in a cohort of patients with breast cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with breast cancer or breast cancer survivors who underwent cardiac stress PET imaging from 2006 to 2017 at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Patients with a history of clinically overt CAD, LVEF < 45%, or abnormal myocardial perfusion were excluded. Subjects were followed from time of PET to the occurrence of a first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and all-cause death.

Results

The final cohort included 87 patients (median age 69.0 years, 98.9% female, mean MFR 2.05). Over a median follow-up of 7.6 years after PET, the lowest MFR tertile was associated with higher cumulative incidence of MACE (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 4.91; 95% CI 1.68-14.38; p = 0.004) when compared with the highest MFR tertile.

Conclusions

In patients with breast cancer, coronary vasomotor dysfunction was associated with incident cardiovascular events. MFR may have potential as a risk stratification biomarker among patients with/survivors of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CAC:

Coronary artery calcium

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

MACE:

Major adverse cardiovascular event

MFR:

Myocardial flow reserve

PET:

Positron emission tomography

References

  1. Taqueti VR, Di Carli MF. Coronary microvascular disease pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic options: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2625‐41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ong P, Camici PG, Beltrame JF, Crea F, Shimokawa H, Sechtem U. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina. Int J Cardiol 2018;250:16‐20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murthy VL, Naya M, Taqueti VR, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, et al. Effects of sex on coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiac outcomes. Circulation 2014;129:2518‐27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bairey Merz CN, Handberg EM, Shufelt CL, Mehta PK, Minissian MB, Wei J, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of late Na current inhibition (ranolazine) in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD): impact on angina and myocardial perfusion reserve. Eur Heart J 2016;37:1504‐13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mygind ND, Michelsen MM, Pena A, Frestad D, Dose N, Aziz A, et al. Coronary microvascular function and cardiovascular risk factors in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: The iPOWER study. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e003064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sara JD, Widmer RJ, Matsuzawa Y, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:1445‐53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah NR, Cheezum MK, Veeranna V, Horgan SJ, Taqueti VR, Murthy VL, et al. Ranolazine in symptomatic diabetic patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: Impact on microvascular and diastolic function. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e005027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Taqueti VR, Solomon SD, Shah AM, Desai AS, Groarke JD, Osborne MT, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and future risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2018;39:840‐9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bajaj NS, Singh A, Zhou W, Gupta A, Fujikura K, Byrne C, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction, left ventricular remodeling, and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney impairment. Circulation 2020;141:21‐33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suda A, Takahashi J, Hao K, Kikuchi Y, Shindo T, Ikeda S, et al. Coronary functional abnormalities in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:2350‐60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bajaj NS, Osborne MT, Gupta A, Tavakkoli A, Bravo PE, Vita T, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiovascular risk in obese patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:707‐17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, Klein J, et al. Association between coronary vascular dysfunction and cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2012;126:1858‐68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taqueti VR, Everett BM, Murthy VL, Gaber M, Foster CR, Hainer J, et al. Interaction of impaired coronary flow reserve and cardiomyocyte injury on adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients without overt coronary artery disease. Circulation 2015;131:528‐35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Osborne MT, Bajaj NS, Taqueti VR, Gupta A, Bravo PE, Hainer J, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction identifies patients at high risk of adverse events across cardiometabolic diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2835‐7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sardar P, Kundu A, Chatterjee S, Nohria A, Nairooz R, Bangalore S, et al. Long-term cardiovascular mortality after radiotherapy for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol 2017;40:73‐81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Plana JC, Galderisi M, Barac A, Ewer MS, Ky B, Scherrer-Crosbie M, et al. Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:1063‐93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barac A, Murtagh G, Carver JR, Chen MH, Freeman AM, Herrmann J, et al. Cardiovascular health of patients with cancer and cancer survivors: A roadmap to the next level. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:2739‐46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Muñoz D, Aboyans V, Asteggiano R, Galderisi M, et al. 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016;37:2768‐801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lancellotti P, Nkomo VT, Badano LP, Bergler-Klein J, Bogaert J, Davin L, et al. Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults: A report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:721‐40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schultz-Hector S. Radiation-induced heart disease: Review of experimental data on dose response and pathogenesis. Int J Radiat Biol 1992;61:149‐60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schultz-Hector S, Balz K. Radiation-induced loss of endothelial alkaline phosphatase activity and development of myocardial degeneration. An ultrastructural study. Lab Invest 1994;71:252‐60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stewart FA, Hoving S, Russell NS. Vascular damage as an underlying mechanism of cardiac and cerebral toxicity in irradiated cancer patients. Radiat Res 2010;174:865‐9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, Bennet AM, Blom-Goldman U, Bronnum D, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;368:987‐98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rehammar JC, Jensen MB, McGale P, Lorenzen EL, Taylor C, Darby SC, et al. Risk of heart disease in relation to radiotherapy and chemotherapy with anthracyclines among 19,464 breast cancer patients in Denmark, 1977–2005. Radiother Oncol 2017;123:299‐305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Henson KE, Reulen RC, Winter DL, Bright CJ, Fidler MM, Frobisher C, et al. Cardiac mortality among 200 000 five-year survivors of cancer diagnosed at 15 to 39 years of age: The teenage and young adult cancer survivor study. Circulation 2016;134:1519‐31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dess RT, Sun Y, Matuszak MM, Sun G, Soni PD, Bazzi L, et al. Cardiac events after radiation therapy: Combined analysis of prospective multicenter trials for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:1395‐402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949‐3003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. El Fakhri G, Kardan A, Sitek A, Dorbala S, Abi-Hatem N, Lahoud Y, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with (82)Rb PET: Comparison with (13)N-ammonia PET. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1062‐71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002;18:539‐42.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Einstein AJ, Johnson LL, Bokhari S, Son J, Thompson RC, Bateman TM, et al. Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1914‐21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chiles C, Duan F, Gladish GW, Ravenel JG, Baginski SG, Snyder BS, et al. Association of coronary artery calcification and mortality in the national lung screening trial: A comparison of three scoring methods. Radiology 2015;276:82‐90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;138:e618‐51.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Morise AP, Haddad WJ, Beckner D. Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 1997;102:350‐6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mehta LS, Watson KE, Barac A, Beckie TM, Bittner V, Cruz-Flores S, et al. Cardiovascular disease and breast cancer: where these entities intersect: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018;137:e30‐66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Patnaik JL, Byers T, DiGuiseppi C, Dabelea D, Denberg TD. Cardiovascular disease competes with breast cancer as the leading cause of death for older females diagnosed with breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 2011;13:R64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hader SN, Zinkevich N, Norwood Toro LE, Kriegel AJ, Kong A, Freed JK, et al. Detrimental effects of chemotherapy on human coronary microvascular function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2019;317:H705‐10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Darby SC, Cutter DJ, Boerma M, Constine LS, Fajardo LF, Kodama K, et al. Radiation-related heart disease: Current knowledge and future prospects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:656‐65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Groarke JD, Divakaran S, Nohria A, Killoran JH, Dorbala S, Dunne RM, et al. Coronary vasomotor dysfunction in cancer survivors treated with thoracic irradiation. J Nucl Cardiol 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02255-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Taqueti VR, Hachamovitch R, Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, et al. Global coronary flow reserve is associated with adverse cardiovascular events independently of luminal angiographic severity and modifies the effect of early revascularization. Circulation 2015;131:19‐27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hecht HS, Cronin P, Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Kazerooni EA, Narula J, et al. 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2017;11:74‐84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr. Dorbala is a member of an advisory board for Proclara, Pfizer, and General Electric Health Care, and receives grant support from Pfizer. Dr. Blankstein receives research support from Amgen Inc. and Astellas Inc. Dr. Groarke receives research support from Amgen, Inc. Dr. Nohria receives research support from Amgen, Inc. and consulting fees from Takeda Oncology, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. Di Carli has received investigator-initiated institutional research grant support from Spectrum Dynamics and Gilead Sciences, and consulting fees from Bayer and Janssen. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo F. Di Carli MD, MASNC.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarises the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

All editorial decisions for this article, including selection of reviewers and the final decision, were made by guest editor Ahmed Tawakol, MD.

Funding

Dr. Divakaran and Dr. Zhou were supported by a T32 postdoctoral training grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32 HL094301). Dr. Divakaran was also supported by a joint KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training (CMeRIT) award from Harvard Catalyst and the Boston Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (5P30AG031679-10). Mr. Caron was supported in part by the Goodman Master Clinician Scholar Award (awarded to Dr. Groarke) and the Gelb Master Clinician Scholar Award (awarded to Dr. Nohria). Dr. Taqueti was supported by Grant Number K23 HL135438 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr. Dorbala was supported by Grant Number R01 HL130563 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr. Di Carli was supported by Grant Number R01 HL132021 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PPTX 6855 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Divakaran, S., Caron, J.P., Zhou, W. et al. Coronary vasomotor dysfunction portends worse outcomes in patients with breast cancer. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 29, 3072–3081 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02825-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02825-1

Keywords

Navigation