Skip to main content
Log in

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses.

Methods and results

Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE. 18F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219). 18F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients.

Conclusions

PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

SUVmax:

Maximum standardized uptake value

TMR:

Tumor-to-mediastinum tissue ratio

AUC:

Area under the curve

ROC:

Receiver-operating-characteristic

PET:

Positron emission tomography

CT:

Computed tomography

18F-FDG:

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose

References

  1. Butany J, Nair V, Naseemuddin A, Nair GM, Catton C, Yau T. Cardiac tumours: diagnosis and management. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:219-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maleszewski JJ, Bois MC, Bois JP, Young PM, Stulak JM, Klarich KW. Neoplasia and the heart: Pathological review of effects with clinical and radiological correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:202-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffmeier A, Sindermann JR, Scheld HH, Martens S. Cardiac tumors—diagnosis and surgical treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:205-11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Perchinsky MJ, Lichtenstein SV, Tyers GF. Primary cardiac tumors: forty years’ experience with 71 patients. Cancer. 1997;79:1809-15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reardon MJ, Walkes JC, Benjamin R. Therapy insight: malignant primary cardiac tumors. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006;3:548-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Furukawa N, Gummert J, Borgermann J. Complete resection of undifferentiated cardiac sarcoma and reconstruction of the atria and the superior vena cava: case report. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;7:96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mankad R, Herrmann J. Cardiac tumors: Echo assessment. Echo Res Pract. 2016;3:R65-77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xia H, Gan L, Jiang Y, Tang Q, Zhang P, Tang X, et al. Use of transesophageal echocardiography and contrast echocardiography in the evaluation of cardiac masses. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:466-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Araoz PA, Mulvagh SL, Tazelaar HD, Julsrud PR, Breen JF. CT and MR imaging of benign primary cardiac neoplasms with echocardiographic correlation. Radiographics. 2000;20:1303-19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Narin B, Arman A, Arslan D, Simsek M, Narin A. Assessment of cardiac masses: magnetic resonance imaging versus transthoracic echocardiography. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2010;10:69-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pazos-Lopez P, Pozo E, Siqueira ME, Garcia-Lunar I, Cham M, Jacobi A, et al. Value of CMR for the differential diagnosis of cardiac masses. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:896-905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meng Q, Lai H, Lima J, Tong W, Qian Y, Lai S. Echocardiographic and pathologic characteristics of primary cardiac tumors: a study of 149 cases. Int J Cardiol. 2002;84:69-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krombach GA, Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Temur Y, et al. Heart tumors: Magnetic resonance imaging and multislice spiral CT. Rofo. 2005;177:1205-18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoey ET, Mankad K, Puppala S, Gopalan D, Sivananthan MU. MRI and CT appearances of cardiac tumours in adults. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:1214-30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang M, Li B, Jiang X. PET/CT imaging in a case of cardiac liposarcoma. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:473-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Higashiyama S, Kawabe J, Hayashi T, Kurooka H, Oe A, Kawamura E, et al. Effectiveness of preoperative PET examination of huge angiosarcoma of the heart. Clin Nucl Med. 2009;34:99-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ak I, Ciftci OD, Ustunel Z, Sivrikoz MC. Atrial angiosarcoma imaged by F-18 FDG PET/CT. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2011;11:E17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao D, Wang SX, Liang CH, Gao Q. Differentiation of malignant from benign heart and pericardial lesions using positron emission tomography and computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:668-77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schraml FV, Yudt WM, Gormley TS, Ho VB. Metastatic melanoma to the heart. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chan V, Neumann D. Small cell lung carcinoma invading the pulmonary vein and left atrium as imaged by PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Julian A, Wagner T, Ysebaert L, Chabbert V, Payoux P. FDG PET/CT leads to the detection of metastatic involvement of the heart in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goto T, Ohte N, Tani T, Suda H, Kimura G. Malignant nature of cardiac liposarcoma revealed by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging. Intern Med. 2012;51:1367-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bilski M, Kaminski G, Dziuk M. Metabolic activity assessment of cardiac angiosarcoma by 18FDG PET-CT. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2012;15:83-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan H, Jiang L, Gao Y, Zeng Z, Shi H. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in primary cardiac angiosarcoma: diagnosis and follow-up. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:1002-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rahbar K, Seifarth H, Schafers M, Stegger L, Hoffmeier A, Spieker T, et al. Differentiation of malignant and benign cardiac tumors using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:856-63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nensa F, Tezgah E, Poeppel TD, Jensen CJ, Schelhorn J, Kohler J, et al. Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging in the assessment of cardiac masses: a pilot study. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:255-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kikuchi Y, Oyama-Manabe N, Manabe O, Naya M, Ito YM, Hatanaka KC, et al. Imaging characteristics of cardiac dominant diffuse large B-cell lymphoma demonstrated with MDCT and PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1337-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tokmak H, Demir N, Demirkol MO. Cardiac angiosarcoma: utility of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in evaluation of residue, metastases, and treatment response. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014;10:399-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Qin C, Shao F, Hu F, Song W, Song Y, Guo J, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/CT in diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with cardiac masses: a retrospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:1083-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jain A, Simon S, Elangovan I. (18)F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in initial assessment and diagnosis of right atrial angiosarcoma with widespread visceral metastases: A rare case report and review of the literature. Indian J Nucl Med. 2015;30:51-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kalra MK, Abbara S. Imaging cardiac tumors. Cancer Treat Res. 2008;143:177-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Basso C, Bottio T, Valente M, Bonato R, Casarotto D, Thiene G. Primary cardiac valve tumours. Heart. 2003;89:1259-60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Mamgani A, Baartman L, Baaijens M, de Pree I, Incrocci L, Levendag PC. Cardiac metastases. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:369-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bussani R, De-Giorgio F, Abbate A, Silvestri F. Cardiac metastases. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:27-34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Patel R, Lim RP, Saric M, Nayar A, Babb J, Ettel M, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in evaluation of cardiac and paracardiac masses. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:135-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kirkpatrick JN, Wong T, Bednarz JE, Spencer KT, Sugeng L, Ward RP, et al. Differential diagnosis of cardiac masses using contrast echocardiographic perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1412-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Maurer AH, Burshteyn M, Adler LP, Steiner RM. How to differentiate benign versus malignant cardiac and paracardiac 18F FDG uptake at oncologic PET/CT. Radiographics. 2011;31:1287-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. de Groot M, Meeuwis AP, Kok PJ, Corstens FH, Oyen WJ. Influence of blood glucose level, age and fasting period on non-pathological FDG uptake in heart and gut. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:98-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ding HJ, Shiau YC, Wang JJ, Ho ST, Kao A. The influences of blood glucose and duration of fasting on myocardial glucose uptake of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:961-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by: Hongyan Yin was sponsored by a Young Scholar Grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81501500) and Hongcheng Shi was supported by Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (shslczdzk03401).

Disclosure

Hongyan Yin, Wujian Mao, Hui Tan, Na Zhu, Quan Wan, Jing Shi, Lin Qiu, Yan Xiu, Rongkui Luo, Haojun Yu, Hongcheng Shi have nothing to declare. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongcheng Shi PhD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article includes a PowerPoint file that should be made available as ESM on SpringerLink. Please include the standard Springer ESM text in the note/footer on the first article page. Below this, include the following text: “The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarises the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

The authors have also provided an audio summary of the article, which is available to download as ESM, or to listen to via the JNC/ASNC Podcast.

Funding

Hongyan Yin was sponsored by a Young Scholar Grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81501500) and Hongcheng Shi was supported by Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (shslczdzk03401).

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, H., Mao, W., Tan, H. et al. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 29, 1293–1303 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02510-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02510-9

Keywords

Navigation