Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation exposure after myocardial perfusion imaging with Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride camera versus conventional camera

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Patient exposure to radiation during the management of coronary heart disease (CHD) can be reduced with more efficient technologies in nuclear medicine, such as the Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) gamma-camera for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) studies. However, it has been suggested that CZT has lower specificity, which might lead to more downstream radiological procedures, particularly among obese individuals.

Methods and Results

We evaluated 244 patients with suspected CHD who underwent CZT-SPECT and matched 1:1 according to sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) with those undergoing MPI study with the Anger gamma-camera (Anger-SPECT). The outcome was the total radiation exposure from the MPI study added to the radiation exposure from all subsequent cardiac examinations during a 90-day follow-up. The total radiation dose after 90 days was significantly lower in the CZT-SPECT group (6.4 ± 4.8 vs 9.5±4.9 mSv, P < .001). After adjusting for potential confounders, CZT-SPECT remained associated with lower total radiation dose, but it significantly attenuated among obese individuals (Beta coefficient − 3.73 ± 0.86 for BMI < 30 vs − 2.30 ± 0.92 for BMI ≥ 30 Kg/m2, P for interaction < 0.032).

Conclusions

CZT-SPECT was associated with lower total radiation doses compared to Anger-SPECT, albeit this benefit may be attenuated in obese individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

99mTc:

Technetium-99m

BMI:

Body mass index

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CCTA:

Coronary computed tomography angiography

CHD:

Coronary heart disease

CZT:

Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride

ICA:

Invasive coronary angiography

MBq:

Megabecquerel

MPI:

Myocardial perfusion imaging

mSv:

Millisievert

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomograph

SRS:

Summed rest score

SSS:

Summed stress score

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global health estimates 2016: Deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949-3003. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marcassa C, Bax JJ, Bengel F, Hesse B, Petersen CL, Reyes E, et al. Clinical value, cost-effectiveness, and safety of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: A position statement. Eur Heart J 2008;29:557-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Timothy BJ, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: Summary article. Circulation 2002;106:1883-92. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000034670.06526.15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Einstein AJ, Knuuti J. Cardiac imaging: Does radiation matter? Eur Heart J 2012;33:573-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting HH, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009;361:849-57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0901249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kao YH, Better N. D-SPECT: New technology, old tricks. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:311-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0290-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Imbert L, Marie PY. CZT cameras: A technological jump for myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:894-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0216-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Allie R, Hutton BF, Prvulovich E, Bomanji J, Michopoulou S, Ben-Haim S. Pitfalls and artifacts using the D-SPECT dedicated cardiac camera. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:301-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0277-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Esteves FP, Raggi P, Folks RD, Keidar Z, Wells AJ, Rispler S, et al. Novel solid-state-detector dedicated cardiac camera for fast myocardial perfusion imaging: Multicenter comparison with standard dual detector cameras. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:927-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-009-9137-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharir T, Ben-Haim S, Merzon K, Prochorov V, Dickman D, Ben-Haim S, et al. High-speed myocardial perfusion imaging. Initial clinical comparison with conventional dual detector anger camera imaging. JACC 2008;1:156-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakazato R, Slomka PJ, Fish M, Schwartz RG, Hayes SW, Thomson LEJ, et al. Quantitative high-efficiency cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT with dedicated parallel-hole collimation system in obese patients: Results of a multi-center study. J Nucl Cardiol 2015;22:266-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9984-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Songy B, Lussato D, Guernou M, Queneau M, Geronazzo R. Comparison of myocardial perfusion imaging using thallium-201 between a new cadmium-zinc-telluride cardiac camera and a conventional SPECT camera. Clin Nucl Med 2011;36:776-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e31821a294e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. Practice Guideline 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:354-471. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e318277d6a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nudi F, Iskandrian AE, Schillaci O, Peruzzi M, Frati G, Biondi-Zoccai G. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging with CZT technology: Systemic review and meta-analysis of comparison with invasive coronary angiography. JACC 2017;10:787-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, Hansen CL, Nichols KJ, Thompson RC, et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:709-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9244-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Einstein AJ, Pascual TB, Mercuri M, Karthikeyan G, Vitola JV, Mahmarian JJ, et al. Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices andradiationexposure: Results from the 65country IAEA nuclear cardiology protocols cross-sectional study (INCAPS). Eur Heart J 2015;36:1689-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, Travin MI, Verberne HJ. ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:606-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0387-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dorbala S, Ananthasubramaniam K, Armstrong IS, Chareonthaitawee P, DePuey EG, Einstein AJ, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging guidelines: Instrumentation, acquisition, processing, and interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol 2018;25:1784-846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Medicines Agency E. Guideline on core SmPC and package leaflet for iopamidol 370. 2016; 44. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2017/04/WC500226447.pdf.

  21. Stocker TJ, Deseive S, Leipsic J, Hadamitzky M, Chein MY, Rubinshtein R, et al. Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: Results from the Prospective Multicenter Regustry on RadiaTion Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT AngIOgraphy IN Daily Practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI). Eur Heart J 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy546.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gerber TC, Jeffrey CJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: A science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on cardiac imaging of the council on clinical cardiology and committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention. Circulation 2009;119:1056-65. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Carr JJ, Gerber TC, Hecht HS, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography. A report of the american college of cardiology foundation task force on expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2663-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, Gerber TC, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009;301:500-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Efstathopoulos EP, Pantos I, Thalassinou S, Argentos S, Kelekis NL, Zografos T, et al. Patient radiation doses in cardiac computed tomography: Comparison of published results with prospective and retrospective acquisition. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012;148:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography: Results of the PROTECTION II trial. JACC 2010;3:1113-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.08.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hausleiter J, Meyer TS, Martuscelli E, Spagnolo P, Yamamoto H, Carrascosa P, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: The multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study. JACC 2012;5:484-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.12.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cantoni V, Green R, Acampa W, Zampella E, Assante R, Nappi C, et al. Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with conventional and CZT single-photon emission computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01747-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hindorf C, Oddstig J, Hedeer F, Hansson MJ, Jögi J, Engblom H. Importance of correct patient positioning in myocardial perfusion SPECT when using a CZT camera. J Nucl Cardiol 2014;21:695-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9897-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fernandes-Silva MM, Shah AM, Claggett B, Cheng S, Tanaka H, Silvestre OM, et al. Adiposity, body composition and ventricular-arterial stiffness in the elderly: The atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:1191-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vitola JV, Mut F, Alexánderson E, Pascual TNB, Mercuri M, Karthikeyan G, et al. Opportunities for improvement on current nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure in Latin America: Findings from the 65-country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols cross-sectional Study (INCAPS). J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:851-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0433-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Perrin M, Djaballah W, Moulin F, Claudin M, Veran N, Imbert L, et al. Stress-first protocol for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging with semiconductor camres: High diagnostic performances with significant reduction in patient radiation doses. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:1004-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3016-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff and patients of Quanta Diagnostico por Imagem for their important contributions to this study.

Disclosures

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Morita Fernandes-Silva.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarizes the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baumgarten, R., Cerci, R.J., de Nadai Costa, A. et al. Radiation exposure after myocardial perfusion imaging with Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride camera versus conventional camera. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 28, 992–999 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02146-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02146-9

Keywords

Navigation