Summary
This paper provides the current state of nuclear cardiology in China and contrasts it with the state of nuclear cardiology in the United States (US). The West China Hospital and New York-Presbyterian Hospital (NYPH) were used as representative hospitals to contrast nuclear cardiology in China and the US, respectively. In 2015, there were 101 medical cyclotrons, 774 SPECT or SPECT/CT, 240 PET/CT, and 6 PET/MR cameras in China. Most (~90%) of the nuclear cardiology studies are gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and ~10% are other types of studies including MUGA, PET/CT MPI, and viability studies. There are differences in nuclear cardiology between the West China Hospital and NYPH and these include those in cardiac stress tests, SPECT/CT acquisition protocols, PET/CT blood flow and viability studies, reimbursement, and fellowship training. In this paper, we aim to present status of nuclear cardiology in China and provide potential solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The purpose of this article is twofold: (1) to provide information regarding the status of nuclear cardiology in China in 2016-2017, including current challenges and potential solutions, and (2) to present differences between nuclear cardiology in China and the US during this period. The first author spent one year at the New York-Presbyterian Hospital (NYPH)/Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) nuclear cardiology laboratory, had previously worked in five hospitals in China during the past two decades, and has regularly participated in annual nuclear medicine meetings in China.
Nuclear Cardiology Facility
Nuclear cardiology in China is not a separate division but is within the nuclear medicine division. There are a few hospitals in China designated for cardiac and vascular diseases but rarely do any of them have a nuclear cardiology laboratory. It was reported that there were 9467 nuclear medicine staff members in about 891 nuclear medicine laboratories in mainland China at the end of 2015, including 4012 (42.4%) nuclear medicine physicians, 2799 (29.6%) nuclear technologists, 1938 (20.5%) nurses, and 718 (7.6%) radiochemists, physicists, and engineers. In 2015 there were approximately 774 SPECT or SPECT/CT cameras, 240 PET/CT, 6 PET/MR, and 101 medical cyclotrons (Survey Report by Chinese Society of Nuclear Medicine in 2016, article in Chinese).1 Comparatively, in the US there were more than 2000 PET/CT cameras in 2016.
Of note, there is an economic gap between the eastern seaboards and the mid-western regions of China. Almost 76% of the medical equipment for nuclear cardiology studies is located in the eastern seaboards and only ~15% in the mid-western regions of China (Figure 1).2 The majority of moderate-to-large hospitals (at least 1000 beds) have no PET/CT or even SPECT or SPECT/CT cameras in the mid-western regions of China. Of those hospitals with SPECT or SPECT/CT, a minority performed nuclear stress tests.
Manpower and Training
In China, nuclear cardiology training is offered as a part of training in general nuclear medicine, with minimal amount of the curriculum focused on cardiac physiology, clinical cardiology, and radiology. As such, nuclear medicine training programs offer relatively less exposure to nuclear cardiology procedures. Consequently, there is a large knowledge gap amongst cardiologists and nuclear medicine radiologists performing nuclear cardiology procedures or referring patients to such procedures. In contrast to the US, before the year 2000, fellowship training was conducted in both teaching and non-teaching hospital in China, and it was only after 2000 that those training programs were restricted to teaching and approved large hospitals. The 5-year fellowship training programs of radiology and nuclear medicine in China do not require formal residency training. In contrast, the 5-year cardiology fellowship program in China requires formal residency training in internal medicine or in general surgery (Table 1).
In total, as of 2014 there were 2.8 million physicians in China, including about 4000 nuclear medicine radiologists (~1/700). Of about 60,000 to 65,000 medical graduates in 2016, 100 to 200 of them selected to train in nuclear medicine.
Nuclear Stress Tests
Both symptom limited exercise stress tests and 85% of maximal age-predicted heart rate (MPHR) stress tests are used in China.3 Most Chinese nuclear medicine physicians have limited expertise in cardiology, and as such 85% MPHR stress tests are perceived as safe to perform. In contrast, in the US at NYPH, symptom limited exercise stress tests are monitored by trained attending cardiologists. This is however not the case at all US laboratories; in many, exercise tests are monitored by mid-level practitioners or fellows.
Pharmacological Stress Tests
Adenosine and regadenoson have not been approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA), and as such adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is used as an alternative pharmacologic stress agent.4 However, dipyridamole and dobutamine are approved by CFDA for pharmacological stress testing. The evidence base for ATP stress testing is not as robust as that for adenosine and regadenoson, and thus further research is needed regarding ATP stress testing.
Stress/Rest Acquisition Protocols and Isotopes
Supine gated stress imaging, with either CT attenuation correction (CTAC) and/or prone non-gated imaging, is performed on all patients at NYPH. For most patients, stress imaging is performed first, with supine gated rest imaging performed only if warranted based on abnormal stress findings. For some patients with higher pre-test probability of abnormal findings, rest imaging is performed first. In China, either (i) supine gated stress imaging with CTAC, followed by supine gated rest imaging with CTAC, or (ii) supine gated stress imaging, followed by supine gated rest imaging, or (iii) prone non-gated stress imaging, followed by prone non-gated rest imaging, is performed using Tc-99m sestamibi for MPI tests. Although it has been approved by the CFDA, Tc-99m tetrofosmin is rarely used in China.
Other Studies
Perfusion and viability studies using Tl-201, multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) studies for the assessment of left ventricular function, Tc-99m PYP studies for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis, and adrenergic innervation studies using Iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) are rarely performed in China.5,6 Measurement of myocardial blood flow using N-13 NH3 or Rb-82 with PET/CT is not regularly conducted in China.7 PET/CT F-18 FDG studies for myocardial viability and cardiac sarcoidosis are also rarely performed in China.8 In total, about 6 hospitals in China had a license for PET/MR in 2016.9,10,11,12,13
About 100,000 nuclear cardiology studies were performed in China in 2012, including about 3755 cardiac PET/CT studies (data published in Chinese). The annual test numbers did not change significantly from 2012 to 2016.
Healthcare Insurance
In 2016, it was reported that China had a total population of over 1.4 billion inhabitants, with roughly 57% concentrated in urban areas. While China’s health care spending was estimated at 5.4% of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2013, it was 17.4% of the US GDP in 2014.14 Tc-99m sestamibi MPI studies are not reimbursed for outpatients but only for inpatients. PET/CT scans are an out-of-pocket expense for most of the population.
Unlike in the US, patients with stable symptoms suspected to be due to CAD in China frequently undergo coronary angiography ($1000-1500) and coronary revascularization ($10,000 for CABG or for PCI) without prior functional assessment.
Problems and Challenges
Nuclear cardiology in China has three main problems. First, high cost; for example, Tc-99m MIBI MPI costs $200-250 for a stress/rest study which few patients can afford. Second, turf issues exist between cardiology and nuclear medicine. This could be solved by fostering co-operative working relationships and establishment of nuclear cardiology laboratories run by either or both depending on qualifications. Third, there is a knowledge gap among physicians. This could be solved by a more structured training, exchange programs and additional training outside China, and visiting lectureships by experts in the field.
Conclusion
In China, nuclear cardiology is a young field. Further development is required and obstacles need to be overcome before nuclear cardiology becomes widely available for routine patient care, to advance cardiovascular health across the population.
Abbreviations
- PET:
-
Positron emission tomography
- SPECT:
-
Single photon emission computerized tomography
- Tc-99m MIBI:
-
Technetium-99m sestamibi
- N-13 NH3:
-
N-13 ammonia
- FDG:
-
Fluorodeoxyglucose
- Tl-201:
-
Thallium-201
- ATP:
-
Adenosine triphosphate
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- MPHR:
-
Maximally predicted heart rate
References
Chen Y, Chen R, Zhou X, Liu J, Huang G. Report on the development and application of PET/CT in mainland China. Oncotarget. 2017.
Hung GU, Wang YF, Su HY, Hsieh TC, Ko CL, Yen RF. New trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016;32:156-66.
Han PP, Fang W, Tian YQ, Gao Y, Yang MF, Zhang XL, et al. Comparison of coronary CT angiography and stress/rest myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in a Chinese population. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:798-804.
He Q, Yao Z, Yu X, Qu W, Sun F, Ji F, et al. Evaluation of (99 m)Tc-MIBI myocardial perfusion imaging with intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate in diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2002;115:1603-7.
Chen GB, Wu H, He XJ, Huang JX, Yu D, Xu WY, et al. Adenosine stress thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging for detecting coronary artery disease at an early stage. J Xray Sci Technol. 2013;21:317-22.
Yang SN, Sun SS, Zhang G, Chou KT, Lo SW, Chiou YR, et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction estimation using mutual information on technetium-99 m multiple-gated SPECT scans. Biomed Eng Online. 2015;14:119.
Xiangsong Z, Xingchong S, Chang Y, Xiaoyan W, Zhifeng C. 13 N-NH3 versus F-18 FDG in detection of intracranial meningioma: Initial report. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:1003-6.
Yang MF, Xie BQ, Lv XD, Hua ZD, Duan FJ, Yan CW, et al. The role of myocardial viability assessed by perfusion/F-18 FDG imaging in children with anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:44-8.
Zhang S, Xin J, Sun H, Ma J, Ma Q, Guo Q, et al. Accuracy of PET/MR image coregistration of cervical lesions. Nucl Med Commun. 2016;37:609-15.
Xin J, Ma Q, Guo Q, Sun H, Zhang S, Liu C, et al. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:751-9.
Cheng L, Liu Y, Ma T, Wang S, Wei Q, Xu T. Dedicated brain PET system of PET/MR for brain research. EJNMMI Phys. 2015;2:A63.
Becker R, Casella C, Dissertori G, Fischer J, Howard A, Jeitler A, et al. The SAFIR project: An innovative high rate preclinical PET/MR detector towards dynamic multimodal imaging. EJNMMI Phys. 2015;2:A15.
Zhang S, Xin J, Guo Q, Ma J, Ma Q, Sun H. Comparison of tumor volume between PET and MRI in cervical cancer with hybrid PET/MR. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:744-50.
McCarthy M. US healthcare spending will reach 20% of GDP by 2024, says report. BMJ. 2015;351:h4204.
Acknowledgement
I thank Andrew J. Einstein, Ami E. Iskandrian, and Rachelle Morgenstern for editorial help. I thank Jianming Li and Jianfeng Wang for providing the rough numbers of nuclear cardiology studies in China.
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, G. Nuclear cardiology in China: 2017. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 24, 1810–1813 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0985-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0985-x