Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between ischemia-induced left ventricular dysfunction, coronary flow reserve, and coronary steal on regadenoson stress-gated 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Gated rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies are acquired both at rest and during pharmacologic stress. Stress-induced ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) can produce a significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from rest to stress. We determined the prevalence on PET of stress LVD with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and its association with absolute global and regional coronary flow reserve (CFR), and with relative perfusion defect summed difference score (SDS).

Methods and Results

We studied 205 patients with known or suspected coronary disease (120 M, 75 F, age 69 ± 13 years) who had clinically indicated rest/regadenoson stress 82Rb PET/CT studies. Data were acquired in dynamic gated list mode. Global and 17-segment regional CFR values were computed from first-pass flow data using a 2-compartment model and factor analysis applied to auto-generated time-activity curves. Rest and stress LVEF and SDS were quantified from gated equilibrium myocardial perfusion tomograms using Emory Cardiac Toolbox software. LVD was defined as a change in LVEF of ≤−5% from rest to stress. A subgroup of 109 patients also had coronary angiography. Stress LVD developed in 32 patients (16%), with mean EF change of −10 ± 5%, vs +6 ± 7% for patients without LVD (P < .0001). EF was similar at rest in patients with and without stress LVD (57 ± 18% vs 56 ± 16%, P = .63), but lower during stress for patients with LVD (47 ± 20% vs 61 ± 16%, P = .0001). CFR was significantly lower in patients with LVD (1.61 ± 0.67 vs 2.21 ± 1.03, Wilcoxon P = .002), and correlated significantly with change in EF (r = 0.35, P < .0001), but not with SDS (r = −0.13, P = .07). The single variable most strongly associated with high risk of CAD (i.e., left main stenosis ≥50%, LAD % stenosis ≥70%, and/or 3-vessel disease) was stress EF (χ2 = 17.3, P < .0001). There was a higher prevalence of patients with territorial CFR values ≤1.0, consistent with coronary steal, in the LVD group than in the non-LVD group (39% vs 12%, P = .001).

Conclusions

LVD developed in 16% of patients undergoing 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging, and was associated with multivessel coronary artery disease. There was a significant relationship between LVD and coronary blood flow during stress, with LVD corresponding to a low CFR. Territorial CFR ≤1.0 was more common in patients with LVD than those without, suggesting that coronary steal is an important pathophysiologic mechanism contributing to pharmacologic stress-induced LVD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamad MA, van Straten AH, Schonberger JP, ter Woorst JF, de Wolf AM, Martens EJ, et al. Preoperative ejection fraction as a predictor of survival after coronary artery bypass grafting: Comparison with a matched general population. J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;5:29-36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamagishi H, Shirai N, Yoshiyama M, Teragaki M, Akioka K, Takeuchi K, et al. Incremental value of left ventricular ejection fraction for detection of multivessel coronary artery disease in exercise (201)Tl gated myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 2002;43:131-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones RH, McEwan P, Newman GE, Port S, Rerych SK, Scholz PM, et al. Accuracy of diagnosis of coronary artery disease by radionuclide management of left ventricular function during rest and exercise. Circulation 1981;64:586-601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharir T, Kang X, Germano G, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, Gransar H, et al. Prognostic value of poststress left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in women and men: Gender-related differences in normal limits and outcomes. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:495-506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Henzlova MJ, Cerquiera MD, Hansen CL, Taillefer R, Yao SS. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress protocols and tracers; 2009. http://www.asnc.org/imageuploads/Imaging-GuidelinesStressProtocols021109.pdf.

  6. Lertsburapa K, Ahlberg AW, Bateman TM, Katten D, Volker L, Cullom SJ, et al. Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:745-53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorbala S, Vangala D, Sampson U, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: A 82Rb PET/CT study. J Nucl Med 2007;48:349-58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bravo PE, Pozios I, Pinheiro A, Merrill J, Tsui BM, Wahl RL, et al. Comparison and effectiveness of regadenoson versus dipyridamole on stress electrocardiographic changes during positron emission tomography evaluation of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:1033-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gould KL. Clinical cardiac PET using generator-produced Rb-82: A review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1989;12:245-51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sitek A, Gullberg GT, Huesman RH. Correction for ambiguous solutions in factor analysis using a penalized least squares objective. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002;21:216-25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Guerin B, Kijewski MF, Di Carli MF, Moore SC. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1264-71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrero P, Markham J, Shelton ME, Bergmann SR. Implementation and evaluation of a two-compartment model for quantification of myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography. Circ Res 1992;70:496-507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M, Rosenspire KC, Krivokapich J, Schelbert H, Kuhl DE. Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using N-13 ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:1032-42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshida K, Mullani N, Gould KL. Coronary flow and flow reserve by PET simplified for clinical applications using rubidium-82 or nitrogen-13-ammonia. J Nucl Med 1996;37:1701-12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Czernin J, Muller P, Chan S, Brunken RC, Porenta G, Krivokapich J, et al. Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation 1993;88:62-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jagathesan R, Barnes E, Rosen SD, Foale R, Camici PG. Dobutamine-induced hyperaemia inversely correlates with coronary artery stenosis severity and highlights dissociation between myocardial blood flow and oxygen consumption. Heart 2006;92:1230-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hauser M, Bengel F, Kuehn A, Nekolla S, Kaemmerer H, Schwaiger M, et al. Myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in children with “normal” epicardial coronary arteries after the onset of Kawasaki disease assessed by positron emission tomography. Pediatr Cardiol 2004;25:108-12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia EV, Faber TL, Cooke CD. The increasing role of quantitation in nuclear cardiology: The Emory Approach. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:420-32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown TLY, Merrill J, Volokh L, Bengel FM. Determinants of the response of left ventricular ejection fraction to vasodilator stress in electrocardiographically gated 82rubidium myocardial perfusion PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:336-42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hung G-U, Lee K-W, Chen C-P, Yang K-T, Lin W-Y. Worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction induced by dipyridamole on Tl-201 gated myocardial perfusion imaging predicts significant coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:225-32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dona M, Massi L, Settimo L, Bartolini M, Giannì G, Pupi A, et al. Prognostic implications of post-stress ejection fraction decrease detected by gated SPECT in the absence of stress-induced perfusion abnormalities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:485-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ford PV, Chatziioannou SN, Moore WH, Dhekne RD. Overestimation of the LVEF by quantitative gated SPECT in simulated left ventricles. J Nucl Med 2001;42:454-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Turakhia MP, McManus DD, Whooley MA, Schiller NB. Increase in end-systolic volume after exercise independently predicts mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: Data from the Heart and Soul Study. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2478-84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gould L. Interactions of multiple stenoses and diffuse disease in branching coronary arteries—Fluid dynamics and clinical implications of branch steal. In: Coronary artery stenosis and reversing atherosclerosis. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 159-176

  25. Garza D, Van Tosh A, Roberti R, Horowitz SF. The detection of coronary collateral circulation using dipyridamole positron emission tomography with rubidium-82. J Nucl Med 1997;38:39-43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakazato R, Berman DS, Dey D, Le Meunier L, Hayes SW, Fermin JS, et al. Automated quantitative Rb-82 3D PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging: Normal limits and correlation with invasive coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:265-76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marshall RC, Berger HJ, Costin JC, Freedman GS, Wolberg J, Cohen LS, et al. Assessment of cardiac performance with quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography: Sequential left ventricular ejection fraction, normalized left ventricular ejection rate, and regional wall motion. Circulation 1977;56:820-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Berger HJ, Reduto LA, Johnstone DE, Borkowski H, Sands JM, Cohen LS, et al. Global and regional left ventricular response to bicycle exercise in coronary artery disease. Assessment by quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography. Am J Med 1979;66:13-21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson LL, Verdesca SA, Aude WY, Xavier RC, Nott LT, Campanella MW, et al. Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1641-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gondarzi B, Fukushima K, Bravo P, Merrill J, Bengel FM. Comparison of the myocardial blood flow response to regadenoson and dipyridamole: A quantitative analysis in patients referred for clinical 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:1908-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gordi T, Frohna P, Suh HL, Wolff A, Belardinielli L, Lieur H. A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of regadenoson, an advenosine A2a-receptor agonist, in healthy male volunteers. Clin Pharmacolokinet 2006;45:1201-12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Druz RS. Current advances in vasodilator pharmacological stress perfusion imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2009;39:204-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Beaucage P, Massicotte J, Jasmin G, Dumont L. Role of nitric oxide synthase, cytochrome P-450, and cyclooxygenase in the inotropic and lusitropic cardiac response to increased coronary perfusion. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1992;40:96-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zoghbi G, Iskandrian A. Coronary artery disease detection: Pharmacologic stress SPECT. In: Zaret B, Beller G, editors. Clinical nuclear cardiology—State of the art and future directions. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby—Elsevier; 2010. p. 244-66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Chambers CS, Brown KA. Dipyridamole-induced ST depression during thallium-201 imaging in patients with coronary disease. Angiographic and hemodynamic determinants. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:37-41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Iskandrian AS. Myocardial ischemia during pharmacologic stress testing. Circulation 1993;87:1415-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gould KL. Coronary collateral function assessed by PET. In: Coronary artery stenosis and reversing atherosclerosis. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 275-88.

  38. Van Tosh A, Luna E, Roberti R, Horowitz SF. Echocardiographic correlates of transient dilation of the left ventricular cavity on SPECT thallium-201 scintigraphy. Chest 1994;106:1725-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Barbara Phippen-Nater and Brie Cronin for their assistance in preparing patient information for this investigation. We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the invaluable contributions to this investigation of the late Dr Tracy L. Faber, whose expertise was an integral part of creating and implementing the CFR computations.

Conflict of interest

John Votaw and Kenneth Nichols receive royalties from Syntermed, Inc. in relation to cardiac software used in this investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Van Tosh MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Tosh, A., Votaw, J.R., Reichek, N. et al. The relationship between ischemia-induced left ventricular dysfunction, coronary flow reserve, and coronary steal on regadenoson stress-gated 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 20, 1060–1068 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-013-9784-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-013-9784-1

Keywords

Navigation