Abstract
Background
In a previous study, we have found that referral to myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for preoperative evaluation of patients before non-cardiac surgery was the most common cause of inappropriate referral based on AHA/ACC Appropriate Use Guidelines, though 40% of scans graded as inappropriate had abnormal MPI results. The aim of this study was to correlate appropriateness grading with (1) the outcome of MPI scans, and (2) the clinical outcome of patients after surgery, so as to determine if the predictive value of MPI was related to appropriateness grading.
Methods
All consecutive patients referred to the MPI laboratory of our center from March 2009 to July 2009 for preoperative risk stratification were prospectively studied. Patients’ medical records and stress data were collected, and all imaging results were recorded. Based on appropriate use criteria (AUC), MPI studies were classified into appropriate, inappropriate, uncertain or unclassified. MPI studies were classified on the basis of their results into normal or abnormal scans. Primary clinical outcome measured was the occurrence of any major cardiac and cerebrovascular event during follow-up up to 90 days.
Results
There were 176 referrals for preoperative evaluation. 39.8% (n = 70) of these referrals were graded as inappropriate. Based on AUC, referrals for MPI in intermediate- and high-risk groups with poor functional class were graded as appropriate, while referrals for MPI in low-risk and intermediate risk groups with normal functional class were graded as inappropriate referrals. The overall event rate was 6.25%. Cumulative death rate at 90 days was 1.7%, non-fatal MI 4%, and occurrence of stroke occurred in 0.6%. The primary outcome was higher in the intermediate group with poor functional class (13%) and high-risk group (64%) than the low-risk and intermediate risk groups with good functional class (4%). In the high-risk group, an abnormal MPI scan was associated with an extremely high event rate (50%) that was significantly greater than the event rate in patients with a normal MPI result (14%) (P = .01). Although 40% of preoperative low-risk and intermediate risk patients had an abnormal MPI result, their overall event rates were low (0 and 4%, respectively), with no difference in the rate of events between patients with normal and abnormal MPI scans in the inappropriate group.
Conclusions
In conclusion, in correlating the relationship between appropriateness grading by AUC with the outcome of MPI scans and subsequent event rates, we found that MPI results predicted outcome in appropriately tested patients, but not in patients whose tests were classified as inappropriate, in whom event rates were low, regardless of the results of testing. Our findings support the AUC recommendations for the selective role of testing in preoperative risk stratification, which use the type of surgery and functional class to determine the appropriateness of referral.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron JF, Mundler O, Bertrand M, Vicaut E, Barre E, Godet G et al. Dipyridamole-thallium scintigraphy and gated radionuclide angiography to assess cardiac risk before abdominal aortic surgery. N Engl J Med 1994;330(10):663-9.
Fleisher LA, Rosenbaum SH, Nelson AH, Jain D, Wackers FJ, Zaret BL. Preoperative dipyridamole thallium imaging and ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring as a predictor of perioperative cardiac events and long-term outcome. Anesthesiology 1995;83:906-17.
Shaw LJ, Eagle KA, Gersh BJ, Miller DD. Meta-analysis of intravenous dipyridamole-thallium-201 imaging (1985 to 1994) and dobutamine echocardiography (1991 to 1994) for risk stratification before vascular surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:787-98.
Poldermans D, Bax JJ, Schouten O, Neskovic AN, Paelinck B, Rocci G et al. Should major vascular surgery be delayed because of preoperative cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients receiving beta-blocker therapy with tight heart rate control? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(5):964-9.
Poldermans D, Schouten O, Vidakovic R, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, Hoeks SE et al. A clinical randomized trial to evaluate the safety of a noninvasive approach in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery: the DECREASE-V Pilot Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(17):1763-9.
Schouten O, van Kuijk JP, Flu WJ, Winkel TA, Welten GM, Boersma E et al. Long-term outcome of prophylactic coronary revascularization in cardiac high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery (from the randomized DECREASE-V Pilot Study). Am J Cardiol 2009;103(7):897-901.
Gibbons RJ, Miller TD, Hodge D, Urban L, Araoz PA, Pellikka P et al. Application of appropriateness criteria to stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies and stress echocardiograms in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51(13):1283-9.
Gibbons RJ. Finding value in imaging: What is appropriate? J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:178-85.
Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, Heidenreich PA, Henkin RE, Pellikka PA et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(23):2201-29.
Hendel RC, Cerqueira M, Douglas PS, Caruth KC, Allen JM, Jensen NC et al. A multicenter assessment of the use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with appropriateness criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(2):156-62.
Mehta R, Ward RP, Chandra S, Agarwal R, Williams KA. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:337-44.
Koh AS, Flores JL, Keng FY, Tan RS, Chua TS. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in an Asian tertiary cardiac center. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:324-30.
Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2007;116(17):e418-99.
Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999;100(10):1043-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
List of support: None.
See related editorial, doi:10.1007/s12350-012-9521-1
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koh, A.S., Flores, J.L.S., Keng, F.Y.J. et al. Correlation between clinical outcomes and appropriateness grading for referral to myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative evaluation prior to non-cardiac surgery. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 19, 277–284 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9462-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9462-0