Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ASNC 2009 Plenary Session II: The Federal Government and Cardiac Imaging

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

References

  1. Blumgart HL, Yens OC. Velocity of blood flow: I. The method utilized. J Clin Invest 1926;4:1-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Des Prez RD, Shaw LJ, Gillespie RL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of myocardial perfusion imaging: A summary of the currently available literature. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:750-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iglehart JK. The new era of medical imaging—Progress and pitfalls. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2822-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams KA. New era of medical imaging. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levin DC, Rao VM. Turf wars in radiology: The quality of imaging facilities operated by nonradiologist physicians and of the images they produce. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:649-51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McDowell TN Jr. Physician self-referral arrangements: Legitimate business or unethical “entrepreneurialism”. Am J Law Med 1989;15:61-109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Intenzo CM. Recent payment and utilization trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: Comparison between self-referral and referral to radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6:437-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stark II Amendment. Federal Register, vol. 63, No. 6, Proposed rules Department of Health and Human Services Health Care Financing Administration 42 CFR Parts 411, 424, 435, and 455. Friday, January 9, 1998.

  9. Williams KA. Testimony March 17, 2005, before the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health. Washington, DC: Committee on Ways and Means; 2005.

  10. Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, Frangos AJ. The disproportionate effects of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on radiologists’ private office MRI and CT practices compared with those of other physicians. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6:620-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging). Circulation 2003;108:1404-18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Circulation 2009;119:e561-87; J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2201-29.

  13. Cerqueira MD, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, Schelbert HR, Wackers FJ, Williams KA. ACCF 2008 Recommendations for Training in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine Core Cardiology Training (COCATS 3) (Revision of the 2002 COCATS Training Statement). A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. Task Force 5: Training in nuclear cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:333-4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tilkemeier PL, Cooke CD, Ficaro EP, Glover DK, Hansen CL, McCallister BD Jr. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology information statement: Standardized reporting matrix for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:e157-71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Intenzo CM. Recent payment and utilization trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: Comparison between self-referral and referral to radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6:437-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta R, Ward PR, Chandra S, Agarwal R, Williams KA. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:337-44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

There are no conflicts of interest nor financial statements to disclose related to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine (Cardiology) and Radiology (Nuclear Medicine), The University of Chicago, 5758 S. Maryland Avenue MC9025, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

    Kim A. Williams MD

Authors
  1. Kim A. Williams MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim A. Williams MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, K.A. ASNC 2009 Plenary Session II: The Federal Government and Cardiac Imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 17, 359–361 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9208-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9208-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation