References
Slomka PJ, Patton JA, Berman DB, Germano G. Advances in technical aspects of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:255-76.
Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, Williams K, Chen L, deKemp RA, Garrard L, et al. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1029-39.
Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, Friedman JD, Case JA, Bryngelson JR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:24-33.
Bateman TM, McGhie AI, O’Keefe JH, et al. High clinical value of follow-up myocardial perfusion PET in patients with a diagnostically indeterminate myocardial perfusion SPECT study. Circulation 2003;108:IV-454.
Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur SR, Reddy P, Carlos RC. Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 2008;15:444-51.
Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1052-8.
Dorbala S, Vangala D, Sampson U, Limaye A, Kwong, DiCarli MF. Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: A 82Rb PET/CT study. J Nucl Med 2007;48:349-58.
Marwick TH, Shan K, Patel S, et al. Incremental value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography for prognostic assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:865-70.
Dorbala S, Hachamovitch R, Curillova Z, et al. Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 2009;12:846-85.
Lertsburapa K, Ahlberg AW, Bateman TM, Katten D, Volker L, Cullom SJ, et al. Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:745-53.
Kaufmann PA, Camici PG. Myocardial blood flow measurement by PET: Technical aspects and clinical applications. J Nucl Med 2005;46:75-88.
Camici PG, Rimoldi OE. The clinical value of myocardial blood flow measurement. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1076-87.
Cecchi F, Olivotto I, Gistri R, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1027-35.
Neglia D, Michelassi C, Trivieri MG, et al. Prognostic role of myocardial blood flow impairment in idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2002;105:186-93.
Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for cell-cause mortality. Radiology 2003;228:826-33.
Schenker MP, Dorbala S, Hong EC, et al. Interrelation of coronary calcification, myocardial ischemia, and outcomes in patients with intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease: A combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography study. Circulation 2008;117:1693-700.
Wagner B, Anton M, Nekolla SG, et al. Noninvasive characterization of myocardial molecular interventions by integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2107-15.
Saraste A, et al. Nuclear cardiology needs new “blood”. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:180-3.
Acknowledgment
The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC) received a grant from the North American Center for Continuing Medical Education (NACCME) toward the cost of publishing this review. The authors received honoraria for their participation and Bracco, Inc. provided funding to NACCME for the symposium.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heller, G.V., Calnon, D. & Dorbala, S. Recent advances in cardiac PET and PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 16, 962–969 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-009-9142-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-009-9142-5