Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization and validation of radionuclide angiography phase analysis parameters for quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has the potential to improve the outcome of patients suffering from mechanical dyssynchrony and heart failure. It has been suggested that accurate quantification of baseline extent of mechanical dyssynchrony may lead to pre-selection of patients likely to respond to CRT. The standard deviation from a phase histogram (phaseSD), synchrony (S) and entropy (E) are parameters obtained from phase analysis of planar radionuclide angiography (RNA) that may provide an accurate means of assessing mechanical dyssynchrony. In this paper, the ability of phaseSD, S, and E to detect mechanical dyssynchrony was investigated and optimal values for image smoothing, histogram noise thresholding, and bin size were defined. Finally, the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the methodology was assessed.

Methods

PhaseSD, S, and E were calculated for 37 normal subjects (LVEF > 50%, end-diastolic volume < 120 mL, end-systolic volume < 60 mL, QRS < 120 ms, and normal wall motion) and 53 patients with mechanical dyssynchrony (LVEF < 30%, QRS > 120 ms, and typical LBBB). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curves were created and the area under the curve (AUC), for each parameter, was determined using three different imaging filters (no filter and an order 5 Hann filter with cut-off of 5/50 and 10/50). The AUC was also determined using histogram threshold values varying between 0% and 50% (of the max amplitude value). Finally, AUC for E was determined for bins sizes varying between 1° and 20°. Inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated at optimal imaging values.

Results

No smoothing was found to maximize the AUC. The AUC was independent of histogram threshold value. However, a value of 20% provided optimal visualization of the phase image. The AUC was also independent of bin size. At the optimal imaging values, the sensitivity and specificity for all parameters for detection of mechanical dyssynchrony was measured to be 89-100%. Inter- and intra-observer correlation coefficients >0.99 were found for phaseSD, S and E.

Conclusions

Optimized planar RNA phase analysis parameters, phaseSD, S, and E, were able to detect mechanical dyssynchrony with low inter- and intra-observer variability. Studies assessing the ability of these parameters to predict CRT outcome are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thackray S, Coletta A, Jones P, Dunn A, Clark AL, Cleland JG. Clinical trials update: Highlights of the Scientific Sessions of Heart Failure 2001, a meeting of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. CONTAK-CD, CHRISTMAS, OPTIME-CHF. Eur J Heart Fail 2001;3:491-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McAlister FA, Ezekowitz J, Hooton N, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction – a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 2007;297:2502-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Freemantle N, Tharmanathan P, Calvert MJ, Abraham WT, Ghosh J, Cleland JG. Cardiac resynchronisation for patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Eur J Heart Fail 2006;8:433-40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Birnie DH, Tang AS. The problem of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Curr Opin Cardiol 2006;21:20-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu CM, Fung WH, Lin H, Zhang Q, Sanderson JE, Lau CP. Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:684-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pitzalis MV, Iacoviello M, Romito R, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy tailored by echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular asynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1615-22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kerwin WF, Botvinick EH, O’Connell JW, et al. Ventricular contraction abnormalities in dilated cardiomyopathy: Effect of biventricular pacing to correct interventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1221-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Sisti A, Toussaint JF, Lavergne T, et al. Determinants of mortality in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: Baseline clinical, echocardiographic, and angioscintigraphic evaluation prior to resynchronization. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:1260-70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Toussaint JF, Lavergne T, Kerrou K, et al. Basal asynchrony and resynchronization with biventricular pacing predict long-term improvement of LV function in heart failure patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003;26:1815-23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox DJ, Fitzpatrick AP, Davidson NC. Optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy: Addressing the problem of “non-responders”. Heart 2005;91:1000-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sciagra R, Giaccardi M, Porciani MC, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using gated SPECT in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Nucl Med 2004;45:164-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1834-40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, et al. Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation 2008;117:2608-16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen J, Henneman MM, Trimble MA, et al. Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:127-36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Westenberg JJ, Lamb HJ, van der Geest RJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with conduction delay and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: Head-to-head comparison between tissue doppler imaging and velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2042-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. White JA, Yee R, Yuan X, et al. Delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1953-60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Botvinick E, Dunn R, Frais M, et al. The phase image: Its relationship to patterns of contraction and conduction. Circulation 1982;65:551-60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Botvinick EH, Frais MA, Shosa DW, et al. An accurate means of detecting and characterizing abnormal patterns of ventricular activation by phase image analysis. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:289-98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Connell JW, Schreck C, Moles M, et al. A unique method by which to quantitate synchrony with equilibrium radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:441-50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fauchier L, Marie O, Casset-Senon D, Babuty D, Cosnay P, Fauchier JP. Interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: A prognostic study with fourier phase analysis of radionuclide angioscintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:2022-30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Massardo T, Gal RA, Grenier RP, Schmidt DH, Port SC. Left ventricular volume calculation using a count-based ratio method applied to multigated radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Med 1991;31:450-6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Port SC. Timing is everything. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:10-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Toussaint JF, Peix A, Lavergne T, et al. Reproducibility of the ventricular synchronization parameters assessed by multiharmonic phase analysis of radionuclide angiography in the normal heart. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002;18:187-94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mary Dalipaj and Brian Marvin for their assistance in collecting the data. The authors would also like to thank Benoit Galarneau and Hermes Medical Solutions for assistance in developing the phase analysis program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Wassenaar PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wassenaar, R., O’Connor, D., Dej, B. et al. Optimization and validation of radionuclide angiography phase analysis parameters for quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 16, 895–903 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-009-9119-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-009-9119-4

Keywords

Navigation