Skip to main content
Log in

Adherence and persistence among multiple sclerosis patients after one immunomodulatory therapy failure: Retrospective claims analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

There are no published data on patient adherence to, and persistence with, disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) after one immunomodulatory failure. The present study compares secondline DMT adherence and persistence among patients with MS.

Methods

Patients with MS initiating a second-line treatment with natalizumab, intramuscular interferon beta-1a (i.m.-IFNβ-1a), subcutaneous (s.c.) IFNβ-1a, interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b), and glatiramer acetate (GA) from January 1, 2006 to October 4, 2008 were identified from a retrospective claims database associated with a large US health plan. Adherence was measured with medication possession ratio (MPR); adherence indicated MPR ≥0.80. Persistence was measured as time until a minimum 60-day gap in second-line therapy. Adherence and persistence were modeled with logistic and Cox proportional hazard regressions, respectively.

Results

The study population comprised 1381 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the odds of adherence were significantly higher in the natalizumab cohort compared with all other second-line cohorts. The natalizumab cohort was more likely to be persistent compared with the i.m.-IFNβ-1a and IFNβ-1b cohorts.

Conclusion

The natalizumab cohort was more adherent compared with the other second-line DMT cohorts, likely due in large part to active physician involvement and monitoring. Adherence to DMT, even after first-line failure, is critical to achieving optimal therapeutic benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Just the facts. 2010. Available at: http://www.nationalmssociety.org/about-multiple-sclerosis/what-we-know-aboutms/what-is-ms/index.aspx. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  2. Bainbridge JL, Rieckmann P. Multiple sclerosis. In: DiPiro JT, Talbert R, Yee G, Matzke G, eds. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008: 913–926.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Havrdova E, Galetta S, Stefoski D, Comi G. Freedom from disease activity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2010;74(suppl. 3):S3–S7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Group. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology 1993;43:655–661.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs LD, Cookfair DL, Rudick RA, et al. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. The Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG). Ann Neurol 1996;39:285–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. PRISMS. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group. Lancet 1998;352:1498–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Biogen Idec, I. Avonex (interferon beta-1a) prescribing information. 2008. Available at: http://www.avonex.com/pdfs/pi_luer_lock.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  8. Biogen Idec, IaEPI. Tysabri (natalizumab) prescribing information. 2010. Available at: http://www.tysabri.com/en_US/tysb/site/pdfs/TYSABRIpi.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2011

  9. EMD Serono, I. Rebif (interferon beta-1a) prescribing information. 2009. Available at: http://www.emdserono.com/cmg.emdserono_us/en/images/rebif_tcm115_19765.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  10. Teva Neuroscience, I. Copaxone (glatiramer acette) prescribing information. 2011. Available at: http://www.sharedsolutions.com/pdfs/PrescribingInformation.aspx. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  11. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, I. Betaseron (interferon beta-1b) prescribing information. 2010. Available at: http://berlex.bayerhealthcare.com/html/products/pi/Betaseron_PI.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  12. United States Food and Drug Administration. Novantrone (mitoxantrone) drug label. 2010. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/019297s033s034lbl.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  13. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Extavia (interferon beta-1b) prescribing information. 2009. Available at: http://www.pharma.us.novartis.com/product/pi/pdf/extavia.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  14. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Gilenya (fingolimod) prescribing information. 2010. Available at: http://www.pharma.us.novartis.com/product/pi/pdf/gilenya.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  15. World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. 2003. Available at: http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_full_report.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  16. New England Health Care Institute. Thinking outside the pillbox: a system-wide approach to improving patient medication adherence for chronic disease. 2009. Available at: http://www.nehi.net/publications/44/thinking_outside_the_pillbox_a_systemwide_approach_to_improving_patient_medication_adherence_for_chronic_disease. Accessed March 15, 2011.

  17. Cramer JA, Roy A, Burrell A, et al. Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. Value Health 2008;11:44–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinberg SC, Faris RJ, Chang CF, Chan A, Tankersley MA. Impact of adherence to interferons in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a nonexperimental, retrospective, cohort study. Clin Drug Investig 2010;30:89–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Treadaway K, Cutter G, Salter A, et al. Factors that influence adherence with disease-modifying therapy in MS. J Neurol 2009;256:568–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Devonshire V, Lapierre Y, Macdonell R, et al. The Global Adherence Project (GAP): a multicenter observational study on adherence to disease-modifying therapies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2010;18:69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Birnbaum HG, Ivanova JI, Samuels S, et al. Economic impact of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying drugs in an employed population: direct and indirect costs. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:869–877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips AL, Ivanova JI, Bergman RE, Birnbaum HG, Stewart M, Meletiche DM. Impact of medication adherence to disease-modifying drugs on severe relapse, and direct and indirect costs among employees with multiple sclerosis. Poster presented at American Academy of Neurology 62nd Annual Meeting, April 10–17, 2010; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  23. Bruce JM, Hancock LM, Lynch SG. Objective adherence monitoring in multiple sclerosis: initial validation and association with self-report. Mult Scler 2010;16:112–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Halpern R, Agarwal S, Dembek C, Borton L, Lopez-Bresnahan M. Comparison of adherence and persistence among multiple sclerosis patients treated with disease-modifying therapies: a retrospective administrative claims analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence 2011;5:73–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tremlett HL, Oger J. Interrupted therapy: stopping and switching of the beta-interferons prescribed for MS. Neurology 2003;61:551–554.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rio J, Porcel J, Tellez N, et al. Factors related with treatment adherence to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate therapy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2005;11:306–309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reynolds MW, Stephen R, Seaman C, Rajagopalan K. Persistence and adherence to disease modifying drugs among patients with multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:663–674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mikol DD, Barkhof F, Chang P, et al. Comparison of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a with glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (the REbif vs Glatiramer Acetate in Relapsing MS Disease [REGARD] study): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:903–914.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Connor P, Filippi M, Arnason B et al. 250 microg or 500 microg interferon beta-1b versus 20 mg glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:889–897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wingerchuk DM. Current evidence and therapeutic strategies for multiple sclerosis. Semin Neurol 2008;28:56–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Caon C. Maximising therapeutic outcomes in patients failing on current therapy. J Neurol Sci 2009;277(suppl. 1):S33–S36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA, et al. Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology 1995;45:1268–1276.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Castillo-Trivino T, Mowry EM, Gajofatto A, et al. Switching multiple sclerosis patients with breakthrough disease to second-line therapy. PLoS One 2011;6:e16664.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gajofatto A, Bacchetti P, Grimes B, High A, Waubant E. Switching first-line disease-modifying therapy after failure: impact on the course of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2009;15:50–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130–1139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613–619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ollendorf DA, Jilinskaia E, Oleen-Burkey M. Clinical and economic impact of glatiramer acetate versus beta interferon therapy among patients with multiple sclerosis in a managed care population. J Manag Care Pharm 2002;8:469–476.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chastek BJ, Oleen-Burkey M, Lopez-Bresnahan MV. Medical chart validation of an algorithm for identifying multiple sclerosis relapse in healthcare claims. J Med Econ 2010;13:618–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Andrade SE, Kahler KH, Frech F, Chan KA. Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006;15:565–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sikka R, Xia F, Aubert RE. Estimating medication persistency using administrative claims data. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:449–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tan H, Yu J, Tabby D, Devries A, Singer J. Clinical and economic impact of a specialty care management program among patients with multiple sclerosis: a cohort study. Mult Scler 2010;16:956–963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Patti F. Optimizing the benefit of multiple sclerosis therapy: the importance of treatment adherence. Patient Prefer Adherence 2010;4:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Portaccio E, Zipoli V, Siracusa G, Sorbi S, Amato MP. Long-term adherence to interferon beta therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol 2008;59:131–135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Prosperini L, Borriello G, Fubelli F, Marinelli F, Pozzilli C. Natalizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: the experience of S. Andrea MS Centre in Rome. Neurol Sci 2011;31(suppl. 3):303–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Holmen C, Piehl F, Hillert J, et al. A Swedish national post-marketing surveillance study of natalizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2011;17:708–719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fernandez O, Alvarenga MP, Guerrero M, et al. The efficacy of natalizumab in patients with multiple sclerosis according to level of disability: results of an observational study. Mult Scler 2011;17:192–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mancardi GL, Tedeschi G, Amato MP et al. Three years of experience: the Italian registry and safety data update. Neurol Sci 2011;31(suppl. 3):295–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Belachew S, Phan-Ba R, Bartholome E, et al. Natalizumab induces a rapid improvement of disability status and ambulation after failure of previous therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2011;18:240–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathy Oneacre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halpern, R., Agarwal, S., Borton, L. et al. Adherence and persistence among multiple sclerosis patients after one immunomodulatory therapy failure: Retrospective claims analysis. Adv Therapy 28, 761–775 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-011-0054-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-011-0054-9

Keywords

Navigation