Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic splinting after treatment with botulinum toxin type-A: A randomized controlled pilot study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Over 1.5 million Americans are diagnosed with a stroke each year, and excessive flexion or extension (hypertonia) of upper extremity joints are common secondary conditions. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of botulinum toxin type-A and manual therapy, with the adjunct treatment of dynamic splinting on range of motion, spasticity, and elbow flexor hypertonia, in a randomized trial.

Methods

Thirty-six subjects were recruited for this pilot study and all exhibited hypertonia in elbow flexion. Six patients were excluded due to noncompliance. Testing was done with pre/post active range of motion in elbow extension, and the Modified Ashworth Scale (extension) for spasticity. All patients received the current standard of care: botulinum toxin type-A injections and manual therapy. Experimental patients were randomly assigned adjunct treatment with Elbow Extension Dynasplint®.

Results

Thirty patients completed the study (mean age [SD] 52±17 years). The percentage of change in active range of motion in elbow extension was greater for the experimental than for control subjects (33.5% vs. 18.7%). The Modified Ashworth Scale (extension) scores showed comparable changes of a mean 9.3% improvement for experimental versus 8.6% for the control subjects.

Conclusion

This study confirmed the efficacy of botulinum toxin type-A in tone management and occupational therapy in contracture reduction. It also showed the value of dynamic splinting in maintaining gains in range of motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper E. Proceedings of the Stroke Disparities Advisory Panel Meeting. November 8, 2002. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fang J, Alderman MH. Trend of stroke hospitalization, United States, 1988–1997. Stroke. 2001;32:2221–2226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun SF, Hsu CW, Hwang CW, et al. Application of combined botulinum toxin type A and modified constraint-induced movement therapy for an individual with chronic upper-extremity spasticity after stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1387–1397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Verplancke D, Snape S, Salisbury CF, Jones PW, Ward AB. A randomized controlled trial of botulinum toxin on lower limb spasticity following acute acquired severe brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:117–125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Francisco GE. Botulinum toxin for post-stroke spastic hypertonia: a review of its efficacy and application in clinical practice. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2007;36:22–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Francisco GE. Botulinum toxin: dosing and dilution. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(suppl.):S30–S37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Childers MK, Brashear A, Jozefczyk P, et al. Dose-dependent response to intramuscular botulinum toxin type A for upper-limb spasticity in patients after a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1063–1069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brashear A, McAfee AL, Kuhn ER, Ambrosius WT. Botulinum toxin type B in upper-limb poststroke spasticity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:705–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheean G. Botulinum toxin treatment of adult spasticity: a benefit-risk assessment. Drug Saf. 2006;29:31–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ravichandran E, Gong Y, Al Saleem FH, Ancharski DM, Joshi SG, Simpson LL. An initial assessment of the systemic pharmacokinetics of botulinum toxin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;318:1343–1351.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai JM, Jones M, Willis FB. Efficacy of dynamic splinting on plantar-flexion tone and contracture seen in CVA and TBI patients: a controlled, crossover study. Proceedings of the 16th European Congress of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Turin, Italy: Edizioni Minerva Medica; 2008:106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Willis B. Post-TBI gait rehabilitation. Appl Neurol. 2007;3:25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nuismer BA, Ekes AM, Holm MB. The use of lowload prolonged stretch devices in rehabilitation programs in the Pacific northwest. Am J Occup Ther. 1997;51:538–543.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shulman DH, Shipman B, Willis FB. Treating trismus with dynamic splinting: a cohort, case series. Adv Ther. 2008;25:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Willis B, Gaspar P, Neffendorf C. Device and physical therapy to unfreeze shoulder motion. BioMechanics. 2007;14:45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Willis B, John M. Dynamic splinting increases flexion for hallux rigidus (pilot study). BioMechanics. 2007;14:49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  17. John M, Willis B, Protillo A. Runner’s hallux rigidus reduction and gait analysis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. In press.

  18. Preston LA, Hecht JS. Spasticity Management: Rehabilitation Strategies. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu AT, Hedman T, Chang JH, et al. Changes in abduction and rotation range of motion in response to simulated dorsal and ventral translational mobilization of the glenohumeral joint. Phys Ther. 2002;82:544–556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vermeulen HM, Rozing PM, Obermann WR, le Cessie S, Vliet Vlieland TP. Comparison of high-grade and low-grade mobilization techniques in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2006;86:355–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsu AT, Ho L, Ho S, Hedman T. Joint position during anterior-posterior glide mobilization: its effect on glenohumeral abduction range of motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:210–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harvey L, Herbert R, Crosbie J. Does stretching induce lasting increases in joint ROM? A systematic review. Physiother Res Int. 2002;7:1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Denham SP. Augmenting occupational therapy treatment of upper-extremity spasticity with botulinum toxin A: a case report of progress at discharge and 2 years later. Am J Occup Ther. 2008;62:473–479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Avela J, Kyröläinen H, Komi PV. Altered reflex sensitivity after repeated and prolonged passive muscle stretching. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86:1283–1291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Buck Willis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lai, J.M., Francisco, G.E. & Willis, F.B. Dynamic splinting after treatment with botulinum toxin type-A: A randomized controlled pilot study. Adv Therapy 26, 241–248 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-008-0139-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-008-0139-2

Keywords

Navigation