Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Postoperative pain is a commonly observed phenomenon after laparoscopic procedures. The use of new low-solubility inhalation anaesthetics leads to faster induction and recovery, but the effect of analgesics on pain when used with them is not sufficiently known. Optimally, analgesic therapy should be started in sufficient time as to be effective at the point of emergence from anaesthesia. We compared the effectiveness of intravenous and epidural analgesia in patients undergoing general anaesthesia with sevoflurane for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early postoperative period.

Methods

Thirty adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were enrolled in this study. The patients in the intravenous group (n=15) received general anaesthesia with sevoflurane and intravenous infusion of 1.5 μg/ml/kg/h fentanyl analgesia followed by postoperative intravenous infusion of 1.0 μg/ml/kg/h fentanyl, supplied by a programmed continuous analgesia pump. The patients in the epidural group (n=15) had combined epidural analgesia with 0.125% bupivacaine plus 50 μg fentanyl and general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, followed by continuous epidural infusion of 4 ml/h bupivacaine 0.125% plus 50 μg fentanyl. Visual analogue scores and the patients’ needs for analgesics and were recorded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joris LJ. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. In: Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia. Vol II. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000:2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bisgaard T. Analgesic treatment after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a critical assessment of the evidence. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:835–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain. 2001;90:261–269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lau H, Brooks DC. Predictive factors for unanticipated admissions after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2001;136:1150–1153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Factors determining convalescence after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2001;136:917–921.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nathanson LK, Shimi S, Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique. Br J Surg. 1991;78:155–159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Quay H. Opioids in pain management. Lancet. 1999;353:2229–2232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stein C. The control of pain in peripheral tissue by opioids. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1685–1690.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1573–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marret E, Kurdi O, Zufferey P, Bonnet F. Effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on patient-controlled analgesia morphine side effects: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:1249–1260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. White PF. The role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of pain after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:577–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kehlet H, Rung GW, Callesen T. Postoperative opioid analgesia: time for a reconsideration? J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:441–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321:1493–1497.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Luchetti M, Palomba R, Sica G, Massa G, Tufano R. Effectiveness and safety of combined epidural and general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Reg Anesth. 1996;21:465–469.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Noma H, Kakiuchi H, Nojiri K, Izumi R, Tashiro C. Evaluation of postoperative pain relief by infiltration of bupivacaine or epidural block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Masui. 2001;50:1201–1204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujii Y, Toyooka H, Tanaka H. Efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998;15:342–344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Motamed C, Bouaziz H, Franco D, Benhamou D. Analgesic effect of low-dose intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:118–124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cassady JF Jr, Lederhaas G, Cancel DD, Cummings RJ, Loveless EA. A randomized comparison of the effects of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after posterior spinal fusion in adolescents. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:246–253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Katz J, Cohen L, Schmid R, Chan VW, Wowk A. Postoperative morphine use and hyperalgesia are reduced by preoperative but not intraoperative epidural analgesia: implications for preemptive analgesia and the prevention of central sensitization. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1449–1460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Matot I, Oppenheim-Eden A, Ratrot R, et al. Preoperative cardiac events in elderly patients with hip fracture randomized to epidural or conventional analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:156–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buggy DJ, Doherty WL, Hart EM, Pallett EJ. Postoperative wound oxygen tension with epidural or intravenous analgesia: a prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:952–958.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mann C, Pouzeratte Y, Boccara G, et al. Comparison of intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly after major abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:433–441.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Capdevila X, Barthelet Y, Biboulet P, Ryckwaert Y, Rubenovitch J, d’Athis F. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Benzon H, et al. Regional anesthesia in the anticoagulated patient: defining the risks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:172–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ. Neurologic complications of spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:83–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mulroy MF. Systemic toxicity and cardiotoxicity from local anesthetics: incidence and preventive measures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27:556–561.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990–1999. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:950–959.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang LP, Hauerberg J, Schmidt JF. Incidence of spinal epidural abscess after epidural analgesia: a national 1-year survey. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1928–1936.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Bargues L, et al. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: the SOS regional anesthesia hotline service. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1274–1280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergqvist D, Wu CL, Neal JM. Anticoagulation and neuraxial regional anesthesia: perspectives. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:163–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bridenbaugh LD, Soderstrom RM. Lumbar epidural block anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy. J Reprod Med. 1979;23:85–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Edelman DS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under continuous epidural anesthesia in patients with cystic fibrosis [Letter]. Am J Dis Children. 1991;145:723–724.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bisgaard T, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. From acute to chronic pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective follow-up analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1358–1364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey

    Demet Doğan Erol

  2. School of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey

    Sezgin Yilmaz, Coskun Polat & Yuksel Arikan

Authors
  1. Demet Doğan Erol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sezgin Yilmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Coskun Polat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuksel Arikan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demet Doğan Erol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erol, D.D., Yilmaz, S., Polat, C. et al. Efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Adv Therapy 25, 45–52 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-008-0005-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-008-0005-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation