Abstract
The possibilities of substantial long-term improvement of predictive timing might be sometimes seen as limited, with scanty information of neural substrates underlying the potential learning process. To address this issue, we have investigated the performance of 21 baseball professionals and 21 matched controls in a predictive motor timing task previously shown to engage the cerebellum. Baseball players, hypothesized as a model of overtraining of the prediction of future state of the surroundings, showed significantly higher quantitative performance than nonathletic controls, with a substantial part of the baseball players reaching levels far beyond the range observed in common population. Furthermore, the qualitative performance profile of baseball players under various conditions as target speed and acceleration modes did not differ from the profile of healthy controls. Our results suggest that regular exigent training has the potential to vastly improve predictive motor timing. Moreover, the quantitative but not qualitative difference in the performance profile allows us to hypothesize that the selective honing of the same cerebellar processes and networks as in non-trained individuals is the substrate for the quantitative performance improvement, without substantial engagement of further neural nodes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Engelhorn R. Agonist and antagonist muscle EMG activity pattern changes with skill acquisition. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1983;54:315–23.
Nichelli P, Alway D, Grafman J. Perceptual timing in cerebellar degeneration. Neuropsychologia. 1996;34:863–71.
Bareš M, Lungu OV, Husárová I, Gescheidt T. Predictive motor timing performance dissociates between early diseases of the cerebellum and Parkinson’s disease. Cerebellum. 2010;9:124–35.
Filip P, Gallea C, Lehéricy S, Bertasi E, Popa T, Mareček R, et al. Disruption in cerebellar and basal ganglia networks during a visuospatial task in cervical dystonia. Mov Disord. 2017;32:757–68.
Lošák J, Hüttlová J, Lipová P, Mareček R, Bareš M, Filip P, et al. Predictive motor timing and the cerebellar vermis in schizophrenia: an fMRI study. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42:1517–27.
Filip P, Lošák J, Kašpárek T, Vaníček J, Bareš M. Neural network of predictive motor timing in the context of gender differences. Neural Plast. 2016;2016.
Filip P, Gallea C, Lehéricy S, Lungu O, Bareš M. Neural scaffolding as the foundation for stable performance of aging cerebellum. The Cerebellum [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 May 11]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01015-7, 18, 500, 510.
Jin DZ, Fujii N, Graybiel AM. Neural representation of time in cortico-basal ganglia circuits. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:19156–61.
Harrington DL, Haaland KY, Hermanowitz N. Temporal processing in the basal ganglia. Neuropsychology. 1998;12:3.
Dreher J, Grafman J. The roles of the cerebellum and basal ganglia in timing and error prediction. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;16:1609–19.
De Zeeuw CI, Ten Brinke MM. Motor learning and the cerebellum. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a021683.
Mauk MD, Medina JF, Nores WL, Ohyama T. Cerebellar function: coordination, learning or timing? Curr Biol. 2000;10:R522–5.
Bareš M, Apps R, Avanzino L, Breska A, D’Angelo E, Filip P, et al. Consensus paper: decoding the contributions of the cerebellum as a time machine. From neurons to clinical applications. Cerebellum. 2019;18:266–86.
Breska A, Ivry RB. Taxonomies of timing: where does the cerebellum fit in? Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016;8:282–8.
Gibbon J, Malapani C, Dale CL, Gallistel CR. Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997;7:170–84.
Matthews WJ, Meck WH. Time perception: the bad news and the good. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014;5:429–46.
Block RA, Grondin S, Zakay D. Prospective and retrospective timing processes: theories, methods, and findings. In: Timing Time Percept Proced Meas Appl. Netherlands: Brill; 2018. p. 32–51.
Bares M, Lungu O, Liu T, Waechter T, Gomez CM, Ashe J. Impaired predictive motor timing in patients with cerebellar disorders. Exp Brain Res. 2007;180:355–65.
Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14:540–5.
Bares M, Husarova I, Lungu OV. Essential tremor, the cerebellum, and motor timing: towards integrating them into one complex entity. Tremor Hyperkinetic Mov. 2012;2:1–9.
Filip P, Lungu OV, Shaw DJ, Kasparek T, Bareš M. The mechanisms of movement control and time estimation in cervical dystonia patients. Neural Plast. 2013;2013.
Freeman JH. Cerebellar learning mechanisms. Brain Res. 2015;1621:260–9.
Hikosaka O, Nakamura K, Sakai K, Nakahara H. Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12:217–22.
Jirenhed D-A, Bengtsson F, Hesslow G. Acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition of a cerebellar cortical memory trace. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2493–502.
Green JT, Steinmetz JE. Purkinje cell activity in the cerebellar anterior lobe after rabbit eyeblink conditioning. Learn Mem Cold Spring Harb N. 2005;12:260–9.
Nicholson DA, Freeman JH. Addition of inhibition in the olivocerebellar system and the ontogeny of a motor memory. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:532–7.
Castaneda B, Gray R. Effects of focus of attention on baseball batting performance in players of differing skill levels. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29:60–77.
Gray R. Behavior of college baseball players in a virtual batting task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002;28:1131.
Malina RM. Children and adolescents in the sport culture: the overwhelming majority to the select few. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2009;7:S1–S10.
Vaeyens R, Lenoir M, Williams AM, Philippaerts RM. Talent identification and development programmes in sport. Sports Med. 2008;38:703–14.
Husárová I, Lungu OV, Mareček R, Mikl M, Gescheidt T, Krupa P, et al. Functional imaging of the cerebellum and basal ganglia during predictive motor timing in early Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroimaging. 2014;24:45–53.
Raymond JL, Lisberger SG, Mauk MD. The cerebellum: a neuronal learning machine? Science. 1996;272:1126–31.
Petter EA, Lusk NA, Hesslow G, Meck WH. Interactive roles of the cerebellum and striatum in sub-second and supra-second timing: support for an initiation, continuation, adjustment, and termination (ICAT) model of temporal processing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:739–55.
Park IS, Lee KJ, Han JW, Lee NJ, Lee WT, Park KA, et al. Experience-dependent plasticity of cerebellar vermis in basketball players. Cerebellum. 2009;8:334.
Park IS, Lee NJ, Kim T-Y, Park J-H, Won Y-M, Jung Y-J, et al. Volumetric analysis of cerebellum in short-track speed skating players. Cerebellum. 2012;11:925–30.
Jäncke L, Koeneke S, Hoppe A, Rominger C, Hänggi J. The architecture of the Golfer’s brain. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4785.
Kim JH, Han JK, Kim B-N, Han DH. Brain networks governing the golf swing in professional golfers. J Sports Sci. 2015;33:1980–7.
Gur RC, Mozley LH, Mozley PD, Resnick SM, Karp JS, Alavi A, et al. Sex differences in regional cerebral glucose metabolism during a resting state. Science. 1995;267:528–31.
Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Fowler JS, Hitzemann R, Pappas N, Pascani K, et al. Gender differences in cerebellar metabolism: test-retest reproducibility. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:119–21.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by P-pool program and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University. The authors wish to thank all of the participants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marková, L., Bareš, M., Lungu, O.V. et al. Quantitative but Not Qualitative Performance Changes in Predictive Motor Timing as a Result of Overtraining. Cerebellum 19, 201–207 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01100-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01100-x