Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing Two Deep Brain Stimulation Leads to One in Refractory Tremor

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Cerebellum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A sizable proportion of medication refractory tremor patients may not respond satisfactorily to deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the ventralis intermedialis nucleus of the thalamus (Vim). Implanting a second DBS lead ipsilaterally to the first one is thought to be beneficial based on scarce and unblinded data. This article aims to report a double-blind assessment of five patients with a second DBS lead for refractory tremor. Tremor was assessed by two blinded movement disorder specialists using a videotaped tremor rating scale (TRS) evaluation of each patient in four conditions: both leads OFF, Vim ON/2nd lead OFF, Vim OFF/2nd lead ON, and both leads ON. Paired t-test was used to determine if double stimulation was different than stimulation of Vim alone or than stimulation of the 2nd lead alone. Each hypothesis was tested with the total TRS as well as the contralateral upper limb score and the contralateral hemibody score. Tremor was secondary to multiple sclerosis in two patients and to essential tremor in three. The second lead was in the ventralis oralis anterior nucleus of the thalamus in three patients and in the prelemniscal radiations in two patients. There was improvement with the 2nd lead or double ON in four patients compared to stimulating the Vim alone. However, when taken as a group, the results were not statistically significant. These results were constant with the three different ratings used. The lack of overall statistically significant improvement might be secondary to the small size and the heterogeneity of our sample. However, four patients had 17 to 60 % tremor improvement after the implant of the 2nd lead on double-blinded evaluation. We report objective improvement after addition of a second DBS lead in patients with tremor refractory to Vim DBS. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehanna R, Jankovic J. Movement disorders in multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases. J Neurol Sci. 2013;328:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jankovic J. Treatment of hyperkinetic movement disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:844–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alesch F, Pinter MM, Helscher RJ, Fertl L, Benabid AL, Koos WT. Stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus in tremor dominated Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. Acta Neurochir. 1995;136:75–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koller W, Pahwa R, Busenbark K, Hubble J, Wilkinson S, Lang A, et al. High-frequency unilateral thalamic stimulation in the treatment of essential and parkinsonian tremor. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:292–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen JP, Degos JD. Thalamic stimulation and proximal tremor. A specific target in the nucleus ventrointermedius thalami. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:498–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ondo W, Jankovic J, Schwartz K, Almaguer M, Simpson RK. Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for refractory essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease tremor. Neurology. 1998;51:1063–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gervason C, Hoffmann D, Gao DM, Hommel M, et al. Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. Lancet. 1991;337:403–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benabid AL, Benazzouz A, Hoffmann D, Limousin P, Krack P, Pollak P. Long-term electrical inhibition of deep brain targets in movement disorders. Mov Disord. 1998;13 suppl 3:119–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Oliveira TH, Ginsberg MR, Cooper S, Nowacki A, Rezai A, Deogaonkar M, et al. Long-term effects of deep brain stimulation for essential tremor with subjective and objective quantification via mailed-in questionnaires. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2012;90:394–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Velasco F, Jiménez F, Pérez ML, Carrillo-Ruiz JD, Velasco AL, Ceballos J, et al. Electrical stimulation of the prelemniscal radiation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: an old target revised with new techniques. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:293–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitagawa M, Murata J, Uesugi H, Kikuchi S, Saito H, Tashiro K, et al. Two-year follow-up of chronic stimulation of the posterior subthalamic white matter for tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:281–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alusi SH, Aziz TZ, Glickman S, Jahanshahi M, Stein JF, Bain PG. Stereotactic lesional surgery for the treatment of tremor in multiple sclerosis: a prospective case-controlled study. Brain. 2001;124:1576–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Plaha P, Khan S, Gill SS. Bilateral stimulation of the caudal zona incerta nucleus for tremor control. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:504–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foote KD, Seignourel P, Fernandez HH, Romrell J, Whidden E, Jacobson C, et al. Dual lead thalamic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of posttraumatic and multiple sclerosis tremor. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:ONS-280-5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gao D, Hoffmann D, Limousin P, Gay E, et al. Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:203–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Papavassiliou E, Rau G, Heath S, Abosch A, Barbaro NM, Larson PS, et al. Thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: relation of lead location to outcome. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1120–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, Kano T, Kobayashi K, Oshima H, Fukaya C. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of parkinsonian, essential, and poststroke tremor: a suitable stimulation method and changes in effective stimulation intensity. J Neurosurg. 2004;101:201–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zakaria R, Vajramani G, Westmoreland L, Fletcher N, Eldridge P, Alusi S, et al. Tremor reduction and quality of life after deep brain stimulation for multiple sclerosis-associated tremor. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013;155:2359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hosseini H, Mandat T, Waubant E, Agid Y, Lubetzki C, Lyon-Caen O, et al. Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for disabling kinetic tremor in multiple sclerosis. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:66–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, Fukaya C, Oshima H, Kasai M, Kobayashi K. New method of deep brain stimulation therapy with two leads implanted in parallel and side by side. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:1075–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu H, Hedera P, Fang J, Davis TL, Konrad PE. Confined stimulation using dual thalamic deep brain stimulation leads rescues refractory essential tremor: report of three cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87:309–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jankovic J, Tolosa E. Clinical rating scale for tremor. Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders. Baltimore-Munich: Urban and Schwarenberg; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McNames J. Signal processing. In: Mechanisms and emerging therapies in tremor disorders. Springer, New York. 2013, pp 371-390.

  24. Lehéricy S, Grand S, Pollak P, Poupon F, Le Bas JF, Limousin P, et al. Clinical characteristics and topography of lesions in movement disorders due to thalamic lesions. Neurology. 2001;57:1055–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirai T, Miyazaki M, Nakajima H, Shibazaki T, Ohye C. The correlation between tremor characteristics and the predicted volume of effective lesions in stereotaxic nucleus ventralis intermedius thalamotomy. Brain. 1983;106:1001–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nandi D, Aziz TZ. Deep brain stimulation in the management of neuropathic pain and multiple sclerosis tremor. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21:31–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hemel W, Herzog J, Kopper F, Pinsker M, Weinert D, Muller D, et al. Deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic area is more effective than nucleus ventralis intermedius stimulation for bilateral intention tremor. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2007;149:749–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the help of Fran Greenfield in acquiring the accelerometry data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA

    R. Mehanna

  2. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

    A. G. Machado, S. Oravivattanakul, G. Genc & S. E. Cooper

  3. 6410 Fannin St, Suite 1014, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    R. Mehanna

Authors
  1. R. Mehanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. G. Machado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Oravivattanakul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Genc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. E. Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Mehanna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehanna, R., Machado, A.G., Oravivattanakul, S. et al. Comparing Two Deep Brain Stimulation Leads to One in Refractory Tremor. Cerebellum 13, 425–432 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-014-0552-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-014-0552-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation