Skip to main content
Log in

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a new radiological classification for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Radiological evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement is based on single-plane parameters such as the alpha angle or the center edge angle, or complex software reconstruction. A new simple classification for cam and pincer morphologies, based on a two-plane radiological evaluation, is presented in this study. The determination of the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of this new classification is the purpose of this study.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the three-view hip study in patient undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI syndrome between October 2015 and April 2016. Any case having protrusio acetabuli, coxa profunda or which has undergone previous osteotomic surgery was excluded. Five observers used our proposed classification to identify three different stages for the cam and pincer morphologies. Inter- and intraobserver agreement of classification was determined using average pairwise Cohen’s kappa coefficient.

Results

The interobserver agreement for the pincer and cam morphologies was excellent. For the pincer morphology classification, the average Kappa agreement was 0.838 (range 0.764–0.944). For the cam morphology, the average pairwise Cohen’s kappa coefficient was 0.846 (range 0.734–0.929). The intraobserver agreement was excellent as well. The average percent pairwise agreement was 0.870 and 0.845 for pincer and cam type, respectively.

Conclusions

The new classification system shows excellent levels of inter- and intraobserver agreement for both deformities. This classification is demonstrated to be a useful tool in planning hip arthroscopy. Further studies are needed to correlate the classification itself with specific intraoperative findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M et al (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leunig M, Ganz R (2005) Femoroacetabular impingement. A common cause of hip complaints leading to arthrosis. Unfallchirurg 108:9–10, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-004-0902-z

  3. Rühmann O (2008) Arthroscopy of the hip joint: indication, technique, results. Dtsch Ärzteblatt Int 105:559–566. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2008.0559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pollard TCB, Villar RN, Norton MR et al (2010) Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta Orthop 81:134–141. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453671003619011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouma HW, Hogervorst T, Audenaert E et al (2015) Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1396–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4037-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ipach I, Mittag F, Sachsenmaier S et al (2011) A new classification for “pistol grip deformity”—correlation between the severity of the deformity and the grade of osteoarthritis of the hip. RöFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nukl 183:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1245817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ipach I, Arlt E-M, Mittag F et al (2011) A classification-system improves the intra- and interobserver reliability of radiographic diagnosis of “pistol-grip-deformity”. Hip Int 21:732–739. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2011.8821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R (2003) Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunn DM (1952) Anteversion of the neck of the femur; a method of measurement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 34-B:181–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lequesne M, de Seze (1961) False profile of the pelvis. A new radiographic incidence for the study of the hip. Its use in dysplasias and different coxopathies. Rev du Rhum des Mal ostéo-articulaires 28:643–652

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rippstein J (1955) Determination of the antetorsion of the femur neck by means of two X-ray pictures. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 86:345–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogata S, Moriya H, Tsuchiya K et al (1990) Acetabular cover in congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Br 72:190–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodman DA, Feighan JE, Smith AD et al (1997) Subclinical slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Relationship to osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1489–1497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T et al (2006) Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:181–185. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000201168.72388.24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arbabi E, Chegini S, Boulic R et al (2010) Penetration depth method—novel real-time strategy for evaluating femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 28:880–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chadayammuri V, Garabekyan T, Jesse M-K et al (2015) Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography. J Hip Preserv Surg 2:392–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnv063

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schottel PC, Park C, Chang A et al (2014) The role of experience level in radiographic evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement and acetabular dysplasia. J Hip Preserv Surg 1:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnu005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nepple JJ, Martell JM, Kim Y-J et al (2014) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement and dysplasia using computer-assisted measurements. Am J Sports Med 42:2393–2401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514542797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Fioruzzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fioruzzi, A., Acerbi, A., Jannelli, E. et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a new radiological classification for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Musculoskelet Surg 104, 279–284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00618-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00618-x

Keywords

Navigation