Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results of osteochondral autografting (mosaicplasty) in isolated articular cartilage defects of the patellofemoral joint.
Materials and methods
Thirty-three patients who underwent mosaicplasty for patellofemoral (either patella or trochlea) cartilage defects (modified Outerbridge classification: grades III and IV) of the knee joint were retrospectively reviewed. There were 25 male and 8 female patients with a mean age of 31.3 ± 6.7 (range 22–47) years. The average size of the lesion was 2.4 ± 0.55 cm2 (range 1.5–4.0). Patients with patellofemoral malalignment were excluded. All patients were followed at least one year with a mean of 19.3 ± 4.3 months (range 12–24 months) using Lysholm knee score.
Results
The mean preoperative Lysholm knee score was 51.9 ± 2.6 (47–58) points and increased to 85.5 ± 4.2 (75–89) points at the final follow-up. There was a significant increase in Lysholm score during follow-up period (p = 0.0001). The results were good in 24 cases and fair in 9 cases. No patients had poor results. No patients had infection. Five patients had postoperative mild painful hemarthrosis. Of these patients, four were treated with rest, ice, compression (elastic bandage) and elevation and the remaining one was treated by aspiration. No patients needed secondary open or arthroscopic drainage. No systemic complications occurred during the follow-up.
Conclusions
Mosaicplasty is an effective technique for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the patellofemoral joint knee which restores the joint function in a short period of follow-up. However, a meticulous surgical technique should be followed to restore the native articular surface and the congruity of the joint.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hangody L, Ráthonyi GK, Duska Z, Vásárhelyi G, Füles P, Módis L (2004) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(1):65–72
Bedi A, Feeley BT, Williams RJ 3rd (2010) Management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. Bone Joint Surg Am 92:994–1009
Haklar U, Tüzüner T, Kocaoğlu B, Güven O (2008) Mosaicplasty technique in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the knee. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 42(5):344–349
Oztürk A, Ozdemir MR, Ozkan Y (2006) Osteochondral autografting (mosaicplasty) in grade IV cartilage defects in the knee joint: 2- to 7-year results. Int Orthop 30(3):200–204
Rose T, Craatz S, Hepp P, Raczynski C, Weiss J, Josten C, Lill H (2005) The autologous osteochondral transplantation of the knee: clinical results, radiographic findings and histological aspects. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:628–637
Hangody L, Vásárhelyi G, Hangody LR, Sükösd Z, Tibay G, Bartha L, Bodó G (2008) Autologous osteochondral grafting—technique and long-term results. Injury 39(Suppl 1):S32–S39
Emre TY, Ege T, Kose O, Tekdos Demırcıoglu D, Seyhan B, Uzun M (2013) Factors affecting the outcome of osteochondral autografting (mosaicplasty) in articular cartilage defects of the knee joint: retrospective analysis of 152 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:531–536
Hangody L, Dobos J, Baló E, Pánics G, Hangody LR, Berkes I (2010) Clinical experiences with autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty in an athletic population: a 17-year prospective multicenter study. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1125–1133. doi:10.1177/0363546509360405
Gaweda K, Walawski J, Wegłowski R, Drelich M, Mazurkiewicz T (2006) Early results of one-stage knee extensor realignment and autologous osteochondral grafting. Int Orthop 30(1):39–42
Visonà E, Chouteau J, Aldegheri R, Fessy MH, Moyen B (2010) Patella osteochondritis dissecans end stage: the osteochondral mosaicplasty option. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 96(5):543–548
Outerbridge RE (1961) The aetiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 43-B:752–757
Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49
Pánics G, Hangody LR, Baló E, Vásárhelyi G, Gál T, Hangody L (2012) Osteochondral autograft and mosaicplasty in the football (Soccer) Athlete. Cartilage. 3(1 Suppl):25S–30S. doi:10.1177/1947603511408286
Ollat D, Lebel B, Thaunat M, Jones D, Mainard L, Dubrana F, Versier G (2011) French Arthroscopy Society: mosaic osteochondral transplantations in the knee joint, midterm results of the SFA multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(8):S160–S166. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2011.08.005
Gaweda K, Walawski J, Wegłowski R, Drelich M, Mazurkiewicz T (2006) Early results of one-stage knee extensor realignment and autologous osteochondral grafting. Int Orthop 30(1):39–42
Visonà E, Chouteau J, Aldegheri R, Fessy MH, Moyen B (2010) Patella osteochondritis dissecans end stage: the osteochondral mosaicplasty option. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 96(5):543–548
Coons DA, Barber FA (2005) Arthroscopic osteochondral autografting. Orthop Clin North Am 36:447–458
Nakagawa Y, Suzuki T, Kuroki H, Kobayashi M, Okamoto Y, Nakamura T (2007) The effect of surface incongruity of grafted plugs in osteochondral grafting: a report of five cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:591–596
Koh JL, Wirsing K, Lautenschlager E, Zhang LO (2004) The effect of graft height mismatch on contact pressure following osteochondral grafting: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 32:317–320
Koh JL, Kowalski A, Lautenschlager E (2006) The effect of angled osteochondral grafting on contact pressure: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 34:116–119
Rose T, Craatz S, Hepp P, Raczynski C, Weiss J, Josten C et al (2005) The autologous osteochondral transplantation of the knee: clinical results, radiographic findings and histological aspects. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:628–637
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Emre, T.Y., Atbasi, Z., Demircioglu, D.T. et al. Autologous osteochondral transplantation (mosaicplasty) in articular cartilage defects of the patellofemoral joint: retrospective analysis of 33 cases. Musculoskelet Surg 101, 133–138 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0448-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0448-6