Abstract
A prospective study was designed to determine whether posterior instrumentation of the spine in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures produces indirect decompression of the spinal canal leading to better remodeling and neurological recovery. The study was conducted in Kasturba Medical College Manipal, India. Sixty-eight consecutive cases of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures were treated by posterior instrumentation, and approval from the hospital ethical committee was obtained. The degree of initial spinal canal compromise, indirect decompression, and remodeling were assessed from the computed tomography scans. The neurological status at the time of presentation and at final follow-up was assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association’s modified Frankel’s grading. The median canal compromise in patients with and without neurological deficit was 47.32 and 39.33%, respectively. The overall mean canal compromise at the time of admission, post-operative, and final follow-up were 47.37, 26.58 and 14.85%, respectively (P = <0.001). The median canal compromise in patients who recovered was 44.5% and in those with no neurological recovery was 55.85%. The median percentage of canal decompression achieved in patients who recovered was 22.15%, whereas it was 22% in those who did not recover. The median remodeling in recovered and non-recovered groups was 64.50 and 80%, respectively. None of these differences was statistically significant. This study shows that posterior instrumentation of the spine produces significant indirect decompression of the spinal canal and better remodeling. However, these factors may not improve the neurological recovery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Denis F (1984) Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop 189:65–76
Hashimoto T, Kaneda K, Abumi K (1988) Relationship between traumatic spinal canal stenosis and neurologic deficits in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 13:1268–1272
El Masry WS, Short DJ (1997) Current Concepts: spinal injuries and rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 10:484–492
Gertzbein SD (1992) Multi centre spine fracture study. Spine 17:528–540
Trafton PG, Boyd CA (1984) Computed tomography of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries. J Trauma 24:506–515
Kim NH, Lee HM, Chan IM (1999) Neurological injury and recovery in patients with burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 24:290–294
Shuman WP, Rogers JV, Sickler ME et al (1985) Thoracolumbar burst fractures CT dimensions of the spinal canal relative to post surgical improvement. Am J Roengtenol 145:337–341
Herndon WA, Galloway D (1988) Neurological return versus cross-sectional canal area in incomplete thoracolumbar spinal cord injuries. J Trauma 28:680–683
El Masry WS, Katoh S, Khan A (1993) Reflections on the neurological significance of bony canal encroachment following traumatic injury of the spine in patients with Frankel C, D and E presentation. J Neurotrauma 10(1 suppl):70
Starr JK, Hanley EM (1992) Junctional burst fractures. Spine 17:551–557
Mohanty SP, Venkatram N (2002) Does neurological recovery in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures depend on the extent of canal compromise? Spinal Cord 40:295–299
Meves R, Avanzi O (2006) Correlation among canal compromise, neurological deficit, and injury severity in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 31(18):2137–2141
Lemon V, Wagner F, Montesano P (1992) Management of thoracolumbar fractures with accompanying neurological injury. Neurosurg 30:661–671
Zou D, Yoo JU, Edwards WT, Donovan DM, Chang KW, Bayley JC et al (1993) Mechanics of anatomic reduction of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 18:195–203
Harriington RM (1993) Biomechanics of indirect reduction of bone retropulsed into the spinal canal in vertebral fracture. Spine 18:692–699
Maynard FM, Bracken MB, Creasy G et al (1997) International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 35:266–274
Mumford J, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Goel VK (1993) Thoracolumbar burst fractures: the clinical efficacy and out come of nonoperative management. Spine 18:955–970
Riska EB, Myllynen P, Bostman O (1987) Anterolateral decompression for neurological involvement in thoracolumbar fractures: a review of 72 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:704–708
Esses RL, Allen BL (1990) Evaluation of surgical treatment of burst fractures. Spine 15:667–673
Gertzbein SD, Court-Brown CM, Jacobs RR et al (1988) Decompression and circumferential stabilization of unstable spinal fractures. Spine 13:892–895
Boerger TO, Limb D, Dickson RA (2000) Does ‘canal clearance’ affect neurological outcome after thoracolumbar burst fracture? J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 82(5):629–635
Dai L-Y (2001) Remodeling of the spinal canal after thoracolumbar burst fractures. Clin Orthop 382:119–123
Johnsson R, Herrlin K, Hagglund G, Stromqvist B (1991) Spinal canal remodeling after thoracolumbar fractures with intraspinal bone fragments. Acta Orthop Scand 62:125–127
De Klerk LW, Fontjne WP, Stijnen T et al (1998) Spontaneous remodeling of the spinal canal after conservative management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 23:1057–1060
Rosenberg N, Lenger R, Weisz I, Stein H (1997) Neurological recovery in consecutive series of vertebral fracture patients with bony fragments within the spinal canal. Spinal Cord 35:92–95
Bradford PG, Bohlman HH, Yaun HA (1985) Anterior decompression of thoracolumbar fractures with incomplete neurological deficit using a retroperitoneal approach. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 67:89–104
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dr Sreekumaran Nair, Professor, Department of Statistics, for contributing the statistical analysis of the data. They are also thankful to Professor Benjamin Joseph, Manipal, for his valuable suggestions to improve the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohanty, S.P., Bhat, S.N. & Ishwara-Keerthi, C. The effect of posterior instrumentation of the spine on canal dimensions and neurological recovery in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. Musculoskelet Surg 95, 101–106 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-011-0111-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-011-0111-1