Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The salvage of knee-exposed prosthesis using neurofasciocutaneous sural flap

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prosthetic exposure is a severe complication of total knee arthroplasty. Many factors are responsible for failed wound healing, and successful salvage of total knee arthroplasty requires early identification of infection, antecedent events related with wound healing failure, aggressive surgical debridement and early appropriate soft-tissue coverage with local skin, fasciocutaneous, muscle, neurocutaneous or perforator flaps. In this report, we present 15 cases of exposed knee prosthesis treated with island sural neurocutaneous flap. Follow-up showed favorable clinical outcomes: all flaps survived and only two cases of hematoma and one of aseptic phystula occurred. According to our results, the island neurofasciocutaneous sural flap represents a sensate reconstructive alternative for providing fine and dependable soft tissue for covering skin defects around the knee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson DP (1993) Infection after knee arthroplasty: the incidence of infection following knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 252:5

    Google Scholar 

  2. D’Ambrosia RD, Shoji H, Heater R (1976) Secondarily infected total joint replacements by haematogenous spread. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58A:450–453

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grogan TJ, Dorey F, Rollins J, Amstutz Harlan C (1986) Deep sepsis following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68A:226–234

    Google Scholar 

  4. Busti AJ, Hooper JS, Amaya CJ, Kazi S (2005) Effects of perioperative antiinflammatory and immunomodulating therapy on surgical wound healing. Pharmacotherapy 25(11):1566–1591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wicke C, Halliday B, Allen D, Roche NS, Scheuenstuhl H, Spencer MM, Roberts AB, Hunt TK (2000) Effects of steroids and retinoids on wound healing. Arch Surg 135(11):1265–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J (1976) A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58A:754–765

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson D, Bannister GC (1986) The outcome of infected arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68B:289–292

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salvati EA, Robinson RP, Zeno SM, Koslin BL, Brause BD, Watson PD Jr (1982) Infection rates after 3175 total hip and knee replacements performed with and without a horizontal unidirectional filtered air flow system. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64-A:525–535

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJL, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D (1893) Ventilation in operating rooms. Br Med J 268:1214–1215

    Google Scholar 

  10. Owens CD, Stoessel K (2008) Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect 70(Suppl 2):3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Irvine R, Johnson BL Jr, Amstutz HC (1974) The relationship of genitourinary tract procedures and deep sepsis after total hip replacement. Surg Gynec Obstet 139:701–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Blomgren G, Lindgren U (1981) Late hematogenous infection in total joint replacement: studies of gentamicin and bone cement in the rabbit. Clin Orthop 155:244–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peters G, Pulverer G, Locci R (1981) Bakteriell infizierte venenkatheter. Deutsche Medizinishe Wochenschrift 106:822–823

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gristina AG (1987) Biomaterial-centered infection; microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 237:1588–1595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bengtson S, Carlsson A, Relander M, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1987) Treatment of the exposed knee prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 58(6):662–665

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Casanova D, Hulard O, Zalta R, Bardot J, Magalon G (2001) Management of wounds of exposed or infected knee prostheses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 35(1):71–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Wolf G (1992) Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 89(6):1115–1121

    Google Scholar 

  18. Whiteside LA (1997) Surgical exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 46:221–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gravvanis AI, Tsoutsos DA, Karakitsos D (2006) Application of the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap to defects from the pelvis to the knee. Microsurgery 26(6):432–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shim JS, Kim HH (2006) A novel reconstruction technique for the knee and upper one-third of lower leg. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59(9):919–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw AD, Ghosh SJ, Quaba AA (1998) The island posterior calf fasciocutaneous flap: an alternative to the gastrocnemius muscle for cover of knee and tibial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 101(6):1529–1536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hierner R (2008) The gastrocnemius muscle flaps. Oper Orthop Traumatol 20(2):128–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hallock GG (2008) Chimeric gastrocnemius muscle and sural artery perforator local flap. Ann Plast Surg 61(3):306–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuo YR, Seng-Feng J, Kuo FM, Liu YT, Lai PW (2002) The versatility of free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of soft tissue defects: review of 140 cases. Ann Plast Surg 48(2):161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Freeman MA, Sudlow RA, Casewell MW, Radcliff SS (1985) The management of infected total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(5):764–768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Poss R, Thornhill TS, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Batte NJ, Sledge CB (1984) Factors influencing the incidence and outcome of infection following total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (182):117–26

  27. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH (1982) The posterior stabilised condylar prosthesis. A modification of the total condylar design. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64A:1317–1323

    Google Scholar 

  28. Simison AJ, Noble J, Hardinge K (1986) Complications of the Attenborough knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68(1):100–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gerwin M, Rothaus KO, Windsor RE, Brause BD, Insall JN (1993) Gastrocnemius muscle flap coverage of exposed or infected knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res (286):64–70

  30. Insall J, Ranawat CS, Scott WN, Walker P (2001) Total condylar knee replacement: preliminary report. 1976. Clin Orthop (388):3–6

  31. Potter TA (1969) Fusion of the destroyed arthritis knee. Compression arthrodesis vs. intramedullary rod technique. Surg Clin North Am 49(4):939–945

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Borden LS, Gearen PF (1987) Infected total knee arthroplasty. A protocol for management. J Arthroplasty 2(1):27–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bengtson S, Knutson K (1991) The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 62(4):301–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson DP (1993) Skin incision for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 64(Suppl 252):17

    Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson DP (1993) Antibiotic prophylaxis in knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 64(Suppl 252):12

    Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson DP (1993) The incidence of infection following knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 64(Suppl 252):5

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hageman WF, Woods GW, Tullos HS (1978) Arthrodesis in failed total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60-A:790

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wade PJ, Denham RA (1984) Arthrodesis of the knee after failed knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66(3):362–366

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Knutson K, Lidgren L (1982) Arthrodesis after infected knee arthroplasty using an intramedullary nail. Reports of four cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 100(1):49–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L (1985) Arthrodesis for failed knee arthroplasty. A report of 20 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(1):47–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bigliani LU, Rosenwasser MP, Caulo N, Schink MM, Bassett CA (1983) The use of pulsing electromagnetic fields to achieve arthrodesis of the knee following failed total knee arthroplasty. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(4):480–485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rand JA, Bryan RS (1983) Reimplantation for the salvage of an infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(8):1081–1086

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD (1983) Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthropla sty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(8):1087–1098

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hood RW, Insall JN (1983) Infected total knee joint replacement arthroplasties. In: McCollister, Evarts (eds) Surgery of the musculo-skeletal system. Churchill Livingstone Edimburgh 4:173–88

  45. Grogan TJ, Dorey F, Rollins J, Amstutz HC (1986) Deep sepsis following total knee arthroplasty. Ten-year experience at the University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68(2):226–234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Vaienti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaienti, L., Menozzi, A., Lonigro, J. et al. The salvage of knee-exposed prosthesis using neurofasciocutaneous sural flap. Musculoskelet Surg 94, 33–40 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-010-0063-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-010-0063-x

Keywords

Navigation