Skip to main content
Log in

GMWB for life an analysis of lifelong withdrawal guarantees

  • Abhandlung
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the latest guarantee feature in the variable annuities market: guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits for life (GMWB for life) which are also called guaranteed lifelong withdrawal benefits (GLWB). This option gives the client the right to deduct a certain amount annually from the policy’s account value until death—even if a unit-linked account value drops to zero. We show how such products can be analyzed within a general framework presented in Bauer et al. (ASTIN Bull. 38(2):621–651, 2008). We price the embedded guarantee for different product designs and parameters under both, deterministic and optimal client behavior.

Zusammenfassung

Das vorliegende Paper analysiert spezielle Garantien in „Variable Annuity“-Produkten, so genannte Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits for Life (GMWB for life) oder Guaranteed Lifelong Withdrawal Benefits (GLWB). Diese Produkte geben dem Versicherungsnehmer das Recht auf jährliche Entnahmen einer gewissen Mindesthöhe, selbst wenn das Fondsguthaben zwischenzeitlich aufgebraucht ist. Wir zeigen, wie derartige Produkte in einem allgemeinen Modellrahmen aus Bauer et al. (ASTIN Bull. 38(2):621–651, 2008) analysiert werden können und bewerten die enthaltenen Garantien für unterschiedliche Produktdesigns und Parameter unter der Annahme eines deterministischen bzw. optimalen Kundenverhaltens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since G W is not needed for GLWB options, two processes G E and one process G W are sufficient.

  2. Contracts where the step-up is applied based on the account value before withdrawals can be considered by letting \(G_{t}^{E +} = \max\{ G_{t}^{E-} ;x_{W} \cdot A_{t}^{ -} \}\).

  3. Note that surrender charges only apply to the exceeding part. Therefore surrender charges were not considered in case (c) above.

  4. Whenever a non-guaranteed withdrawal occurs, future guarantees are also reduced. We here describe a so-called pro-rata reduction which is the predominant form in the market.

  5. Here, IR + denotes the non negative real numbers (including zero); furthermore we let \(\mathit{IR}_{ +}^{\infty} = \mathit{IR}_{ +} \cup\{ \infty\}\).

  6. We understand rational in the sense of maximizing the economic value of a contract. Thus, rationality is defined independent of any utility functions.

  7. For an introduction to Monte Carlo methods see, e.g., Glasserman (2003).

References

  • Anderson, L.: A simple approach to the pricing of Bermudan swaptions in the multi-factor labor market model. J. Comput. Finance 3, 5–32 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D., Börger, M., Ruß, J., Zwiesler, H.-J.: The volatility of mortality. Asia-Pacif. J. Risk Insur. 3(1), 172–199 (2007). Special Issue for invited papers at the Third International Longevity Risk and Capital Market Solutions Symposium

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D., Kling, A., Ruß, J.: A universal pricing framework for guaranteed minimum benefits in variable annuities. ASTIN Bull. 38(2), 621–651 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, N.H., Kiesel, R.: Risk-Neutral Valuation—Pricing and Hedging of Finanicial Derivatives. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamont, D., Sagoo, P.: Pricing and hedging of variable annuities. Life & Pension Risk 2(2009), 39–44 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, A.J., Blake, D., Dowd, K.: Pricing death: frameworks for the valuation and securitization of mortality risk. ASTIN Bull. 36, 79–120 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasserman, P.: Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Stochastic Modeling and Applied Probability, vol. 53. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, A., Ruez, F., Ruß, J.: The impact of stochastic volatility on pricing, hedging, and hedge efficiency of withdrawal benefit guarantees in variable annuities. ASTIN Bull. 41(2), 511–545 (2011a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, A., Ruez, F., Ruß, J.: The impact of policyholder behavior on pricing, hedging, and hedge efficiency of withdrawal benefit guarantees in variable annuities. Working paper, Ulm University (2011b)

  • Lehman Brothers: Variable annuity living benefit guarantees: over complex, over popular and over here? Eur. Insur. 22 (2005)

  • Loffredi, K.: Continued innovation helps fuel VA sales in 2010—highlights from the year in variable annuity product development and sales (2011). https://www.myirionline.org/eweb/uploads/2010_VA_Highlights_Morningstar.pdf. downloaded January 26, 2011

  • Milevsky, M., Salisbury, T.S.: Financial valuation of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits. Insur. Math. Econ. 38, 21–38 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piscopo, G., Haberman, S.: The valuation of guaranteed lifelong withdrawal benefit options in variable annuity contracts and the impact of mortality risk (2010)

  • Sloane, W.R.: Life insurers, variable annuities and mutual funds: a critical study. J. Risk Insur. 37, 99 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Kling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holz, D., Kling, A. & Ruß, J. GMWB for life an analysis of lifelong withdrawal guarantees. ZVersWiss 101, 305–325 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-012-0193-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-012-0193-3

Keywords

Navigation