Skip to main content
Log in

Proposal for correction of the SCR calculation bias in Solvency II

  • Abhandlung
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 May 2014

Abstract

In the context of Solvency II the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) is a well known financial demand which will have to be fulfilled by all European insurance companies to assure a theoretical ruin probability of 0.005 or less.

A standard formula for the calculation of the SCR will be provided. Its current state is given by the Technical Specifications of the 5th Quantitative Impact Study. Every European insurance company will be obligated to use the provided standard formula if they do not legitimate an internal risk model.

The standard formula uses a lognormal distribution which is parameterized with a mean of 1 and a standard deviation parameter. The latter can be set corresponding to the market-wide estimations or corresponding to the data of the company.

We favor the possibility for insurance companies to take into account their individual risk situation and believe that the restriction of a mean of 1 is not appropriate. We therefore introduce a correction formula and propose its implementation into the formula for the undertaking-specific parameter. Using the correction formula leads to the same SCR as taking into account both the individual mean and the individual standard deviation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cf. Hampel (2011), on p. 12.

  2. CEIOPS (2010), p. 198, p. 244 and following.

  3. In case of \(-2\ln(F_{m,s^{2}}^{-1}(u))+q_{u}^{2} <0\) the element x and also the element \(\tilde{s}^{2}\) are not elements of ℝ and consequently \(F^{-1}_{1,\tilde{s}^{2}}\) is not defined. This is inconsistent with the assumption.

References

  • Bronstein, I.N., Semendjajew, K.A., Musiol, G., Mühlig, H.: Taschenbuch der Mathematik, 6th edn. Verlag Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt am Main (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • CEIOPS: Technical specifications for QIS 5. URL: https://ceiops.eu/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=732 (2010)

  • Hampel, M. Prämienrisiko und Eigenmittelanforderung in Solvency II. Versicherungswissenschaftliche Studien, vol. 45. Nomos-Verlag, pp. 12, 15 (2012, forthcoming)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hampel.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12297-014-0267-5.

Appendix

Appendix

The existence of a real \(\tilde{s}^{2}\) in Theorem 2 is important for the benefit from the correction formula. Therefore, we have to analyze for which m∈ℝ+ and s∈ℝ+ the relation

holds.

Using Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 we have \(\ln(F^{-1}_{m,s^{2}}(u))=\sigma_{m,s} q_{u} + \mu _{m,s}\) with appropriate μ m,s and σ m,s , depending on m and s, and q u defined as before. For simplicity in notation we write μ instead of μ m,s and σ instead of σ m,s . Then we have

(6)

For m≤1 and for all s∈ℝ+ the term in (6) is obviously greater or equal to zero and therefore \(\tilde{s}^{2} \in\mathbb{R}\) for such m. Else (m>1) there exists an interval I, given by \(I=(\max \{0,q_{u}-\sqrt{\ln(m^{2})}\},q_{u}+\sqrt{\ln(m^{2})})\), such that the term in (6) is smaller than zero iff σI. Thus, \(\tilde{s}^{2}\) is an element of ℝ iff

$$\sigma\in I^c$$

respectively, iff

$$s^2 \in J^c,\quad J:=\Bigl(m^2 \bigl(e^{\max\bigl\{0,q_u-\sqrt{\ln (m^2)}\bigr\}^2} -1\bigr),m^2\bigl( e^{\bigl(q_u+\sqrt{\ln(m^2)}\,\bigr)^2}-1\bigr)\Bigr).$$

In particular, for m≤3 and u=0.995 we get \(q_{u}-\sqrt{\ln(3^{2})}>0\) and thus

Therefore, we have \(\tilde{s}^{2} \in\mathbb{R}\) if \(s\leq1.5 <\sqrt{a}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hampel, M., Pfeifer, D. Proposal for correction of the SCR calculation bias in Solvency II. ZVersWiss 100, 733–743 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-011-0174-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-011-0174-y

Keywords

Navigation