Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Common Biochemical Markers for the Assessment of Fracture Union

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The progress of fracture union requires close monitoring. Whereas, clinical examination and radiographic studies assess the outcome, biochemical markers like serum alkaline phosphatase and urinary hydroxyproline reflect the actual status of bone resorption and bone formation over a short time frame. 36 patients of long bone fracture were randomly allocated for the study. When the patient reported to the Department of Orthopedics after fracture, serum and urinary samples were collected and X-ray of the affected part were taken. Subsequent samples were collected and X-ray taken just after management (either operative or conservative), after 3rd, 5th, 8th and 12th week, respectively after onset of fracture. According to the course of callus formation the patients were divided into two groups that progressed to proper union or malunion. The levels of serum alkaline phosphatase, urinary total and free hydroxyproline levels were measured and statistically analysed and compared. A statistically significant positive correlation between total urinary hydroxyproline excretion and serum alkaline phosphatase indicate progress towards satisfactory union. Thus, serial monitoring of biochemical markers of bone turnover can be used as an adjunct to clinical and radiological evidence of fracture healing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Camozzi V, Tossi A, Simoni E, Pagani F, Francucci CM, Moro L. Role of biochemical markers of bone remodeling in clinical practice. J Endocr Invest. 2007;30(Suppl 6):13–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. NCCLS. Application of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the assessment and monitoring of bone disease. Approved guideline. NCCLS document C48-A (ISBN !-56238-539-9) NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898 USA, 2004.

  3. Hamblen DL, Simpson AHRW. Adams outline of fractures including joint injuries. 12th ed. Toronto: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoesel LM, Wehr U, Rambeck WA, Schnettler R, Heiss C. Biochemical bone markers are useful to monitor fracture repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:226–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Christenson RH. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism—an overview. Clin Biochem. 1997;30(8):573–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Delmas PD. Biochemical markers of bone turnover. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66(Suppl 266):176–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Udenfriend S. Fromation of hydroxyproline in collagen. Science. 1966;152:1335–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergman I, Loxley R. The determination of hydroxyproline in urinary hydrolysates. Clin Chim Acta. 1979;96:125–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowers LD. Kinetic serum creatinine assay. I. The role of various factors in determining specificity. Clin Chem. 1980;26(5):551–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. German Society for Clinical Chemistry, Standard method for determination of alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1972; 10:290.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bagainski ES. Calcium estimation by OCPC method. Anal Biochem. 1973;18:521.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prockop DJ, Kivirikko KI. Relationship of hydroxyproline excretion in urine to collagen metabolism. Ann Intern Med. 1967;66:1243–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ashhurst DE. Collagens synthesized by healing fractures. Clin Orthop. 1990;255:273–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Drommer R. Urinary Hydroxyproline during the healing period of bone fractures. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1979;117(1):77–82. Authors German translation of original article.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caulfield MP, Reitz RE. Biochemical markers of bone turnover and their utility in osteoporosis. Med Lab Obs. 2004;36(4):34–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Semb TH, Gudmundson CR, Westlin NE, Hallander LB. Alkaline phosphatase activity and isoenzymes in experimental fractures. Clin Chim Acta. 1971;31:375–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Erikson EE, Axelrod DW, Melsen F. Bone histomorphometry. New York: Raven Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lal SK, Jacob KC. Variations of some plasma components after closed fracture. J Trauma. 1976;16:2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wharton BA, GoughG, Willims A, Sheila K, Pennock CA. Urinary total hydroxyproline: creatinine ratio range of normal, and clinical application in British children. Arch Dis Child. 1972; 47(251): 74–9.

  20. Howell JR, Wharton BA, McCance RA. Value of hydroxyproline indices in malnutrition. Lancet. 1967;1:1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Mukhopadhyay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukhopadhyay, M., Sinha, R., Pal, M. et al. Role of Common Biochemical Markers for the Assessment of Fracture Union. Ind J Clin Biochem 26, 274–278 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-011-0143-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-011-0143-1

Keywords

Navigation