Abstract
Numerical simulation of ductile fracture in the field of metal forming represents one of the most challenging tasks. Throughout the chain of manufacturing processes, the accurate prediction of the crack surfaces is essential for the quality of the final products. The application of a crack initiation and propagation algorithm known as CIPFAR is presented in order to model the complex ductile fracture processes. In addition, a phase field approach is coupled with a ductile damage criterion to simulate the transition from damage to fracture. The self-contact between crack faces is also modeled through the penalization method in order to prevent the penetration of crack faces. The presented algorithm serves as an efficient computational tool for the industrial purposes in terms of the robustness and quality of the obtained results. Comparisons are carried out with the classical element deletion method in order to show the ability of the new algorithm to tackle the issues of mesh dependency and volume loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tekkaya AE, Bouchard P-O, Bruschi S, Tasan CC (2020) Damage in metal forming. CIRP Ann 69:600–623
Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2004) On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci 46:81–98
Lou Y, Yoon JW, Huh H (2014) Modeling of shear ductile fracture considering a changeable cut-off value for stress triaxiality. International Journal of Plasticity 54:56–80
Bouchard P-O, Bourgeon L, Fayolle S, Mocellin K (2011) An enhanced Lemaitre model formulation for materials processing damage computation. Int J Mater Form 4:299–315
Cao T-S, Gachet J-M, Montmitonnet P, Bouchard P-O (2014) A Lode-dependent enhanced Lemaitre model for ductile fracture prediction at low stress triaxiality. Eng Fract Mech 124:80–96
Cockcroft MG (1968) Ductility and workability of metals. Journal of Metals 96:2444
Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–48
Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 17:201–217
Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part 1-Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductilr media. J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–15
Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32:157–169
Murakami S, Ohno N (1981) A continuum theory of creep and creep damage. In: Creep in structures, Springer, pp 422–444
Kachanov LM (1999) Rupture time under creep conditions. Int J Fract 97:11–18
Lemaitre J, Desmorat R (2005) Engineering damage mechanics: ductile, creep, fatigue and brittle failures. Springer Science & Business Media
Yue Z, Cao K, Badreddine H, Saanouni K, Gao J (2019) Failure prediction on steel sheet under different loading paths based on fully coupled ductile damage model. Int J Mech Sci 153:1–9
Jirásek M (2007) Mathematical analysis of strain localization. Revue européenne de génie civil 11:977–991
Peerlings RHJ, Borst Rd, Brekelmans Wd, Vree Jd, Spee I (1996) Some observations on localization in non-local and gradient damage models. European Journal of Mechanics. A Solids 15:937–953
Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WM, De Vree J (1996) Gradient enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39:3391–3403
Saanouni K, Hamed M (2013) Micromorphic approach for finite gradient-elastoplasticity fully coupled with ductile damage: Formulation and computational aspects. Int J Solids Struct 50:2289–2309
Cao T-S (2014) Numerical simulation of 3D ductile cracks formation using recent improved Lode-dependent plasticity and damage models combined with remeshing. Int J Solids Struct 51:2370–2381
Saanouni K, Mariage J-F, Cherouat A, Lestriez P (2004) Numerical prediction of discontinuous central bursting in axisymmetric forward extrusion by continuum damage mechanics. Computers & Structures 82:2309–2332
Labergere C, Rassineux A, Saanouni K (2014) Numerical simulation of continuous damage and fracture in metal-forming processes with 2D mesh adaptive methodology. Finite Elem Anal Des 82:46–61
Yang F, Rassineux A, Labergere C, Saanouni K (2018) A 3D h-adaptive local remeshing technique for simulating the initiation and propagation of cracks in ductile materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 330:102–122
Niu L-B, Takaku H, Kobayashi M (2005) Tensile fracture behaviors in double-notched thin plates of a ductile steel. ISIJ International 45:281–287
El Khaoulani R, Bouchard P-O (2012) An anisotropic mesh adaptation strategy for damage and failure in ductile materials. Finite Elem Anal Des 59:1–10
Hambli R (2002) Prediction of burr height formation in blanking processes using neural network. Int J Mech Sci 44:2089–2102
Komori K (1999) Simulation of chevron crack formation and evolution in drawing. Int J Mech Sci 41:1499–1513
Mediavilla J, Peerlings RHJ, Geers MGD (2006) Discrete crack modelling of ductile fracture driven by non-local softening plasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 66:661–688
Feld-Payet S, Chiaruttini V, Besson J, Feyel F (2015) A new marching ridges algorithm for crack path tracking in regularized media. Int J Solids Struct 71:57–69
Francfort GA, Marigo J-J (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 46:1319–1342
Ambrosio L, Tortorelli VM (1990) Approximation of functional depending on jumps by elliptic functional via t-convergence. Commun Pur Appl Math 43:999–1036
Braides A (1998) Approximation of free-discontinuity problems. Springer Science & Business Media
Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83:1273–1311
Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2765–2778
Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2015) Phase-field modeling of ductile fracture. Comput Mech 55:1017–1040
Borden MJ, Hughes TJR, Landis CM, Anvari A, Lee IJ (2016) A phase-field formulation for fracture in ductile materials: Finite deformation balance law derivation, plastic degradation, and stress triaxiality effects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:130–166
Eldahshan H, Alves J, Bouchard P-O, Perchat E, Munoz DP (2021) CIPFAR: A 3D unified numerical framework for the modeling of ductile fracture based on the phase field model and adaptive remeshing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 387:114171
Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 221:163–198
Miehe C, Hofacker M, Schänzel L-M, Aldakheel F (2015) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part II. Coupled brittle-to-ductile failure criteria and crack propagation in thermo-elastic–plastic solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 294:486–522
Needleman A (1988) Material rate dependence and mesh sensitivity in localization problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 67:69–85
Mühlhaus H-B, Alfantis E (1991) A variational principle for gradient plasticity. Int J Solids Struct 28:845–857
Forest S (2009) Micromorphic approach for gradient elasticity, viscoplasticity, and damage. J Eng Mech 135:117–131
Lemaitre J (1985) A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol 107:83–89
Reusch F, Svendsen B, Klingbeil D (2003) Local and non-local Gurson-based ductile damage and failure modelling at large deformation. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids 22:779–792
Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2015) A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation. Comput Mech 55:383–405
Alessi R, Ambati M, Gerasimov T, Vidoli S, De Lorenzis L (2018) Comparison of phase-field models of fracture coupled with plasticity. In: Advances in computational plasticity, Springer, pp 1–21
de Borst R, Verhoosel CV (2016) Gradient damage vs phase-field approaches for fracture: Similarities and differences. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:78–94
Geers MGD, De Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Peerlings RHJ (1998) Strain-based transient-gradient damage model for failure analyses. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 160:133–153
Geers MGD (1998) Experimental analysis and computational modelling of damage and fracture. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven Technical university
Eldahshan H, Bouchard P-O, Alves J, Perchat E, Munoz DP (2021) Phase field modeling of ductile fracture at large plastic strains using adaptive isotropic remeshing. Comput Mech, pp 1–21
Davaze V, Vallino N, Langrand B, Besson J, Feld-Payet S (2021) A non-local damage approach compatible with dynamic explicit simulations and parallel computing. International Journal of Solids and Structures
Aldakheel F, Wriggers P, Miehe C (2018) A modified Gurson-type plasticity model at finite strains: formulation, numerical analysis and phase-field coupling. Comput Mech 62:815–833
Eberly D, Gardner R, Morse B, Pizer S, Scharlach C (1994) Ridges for image analysis. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 4:353–373
Amor H, Marigo J-J, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: Numerical experiments. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 57:1209–1229
Fei F, Choo J (2020) A phase-field method for modeling cracks with frictional contact. Int J Numer Methods Eng 121:740–762
Goldsmith J, Salmon J (1987) Automatic creation of object hierarchies for ray tracing. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 7:14–20
Benson DJ, Hallquist JO (1990) A single surface contact algorithm for the post-buckling analysis of shell structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 78:141–163
De Lorenzis L, Wriggers P, Weißenfels C (2017) Computational contact mechanics with the finite element method, Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics Second Edition, pp 1–45
Hachani M, Fourment L (2013) A smoothing procedure based on quasi-C1 interpolation for 3D contact mechanics with applications to metal forming. Computers & Structures 128:1–13
Choi J-S, Lee H-C, Im Y-T (2010) A study on chevron crack formation and evolution in a cold extrusion. J Mech Sci Technol 24:1885–1890
Husson C, Correia J, Daridon L, Ahzi S (2008) Finite elements simulations of thin copper sheets blanking: Study of blanking parameters on sheared edge quality. J Mater Process Technol 199:74–83
Hambli R, Potiron A (2000) Finite element modeling of sheet-metal blanking operations with experimental verification. J Mater Process Technol 102:257–265
de Sá JC, Areias P, Zheng C (2006) Damage modelling in metal forming problems using an implicit non-local gradient model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:6646–6660
Hambli R (2001) Comparison between Lemaitre and Gurson damage models in crack growth simulation during blanking process. Int J Mech Sci 43:2769–2790
Kumar S, Fourment L, Guerdoux S (2015) Parallel, second-order and consistent remeshing transfer operators for evolving meshes with superconvergence property on surface and volume. Finite Elem Anal Des 93:70–84
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the enterprise of Transvalor with mutual cooperation with the center of material forming (CEMEF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Finite element model
Appendix: Finite element model
In order to ensure the well-posedness and stability of the numerical solution, a bubble function is introduced to enrich the velocity field. The bubble function should have a value of 1 at the center of the element and vanishes at the boundaries. The approximate velocity, pressure and phase field variables can be expressed as
where vl and vb are the linear and bubble velocities, respectively, ph is the pressure and dh is the phase field. \({N_{l}^{k}}\) and \({N_{b}^{j}}\) are the base and bubble interpolation functions associated with node k and element j, respectively. Ne and Nn are the number of elements and nodes respectively. The resulting problem in the general form can be written as
Find (vh, ph and dh)
where \(\vec {g}\) is the body load vector per unit mass, ρ is the density and ωh is the volume of a finite element mesh in the current configuration so that
The following properties are taken into account: \({\int \limits }_{\gamma _{t}} \vec {t} \cdot \delta v_{b} d{\omega _{h}} = 0\) since the bubble function vanishes at the boundaries, the inertial contribution of the bubble part is neglected so that \({\int \limits }_{\omega _{h}} \rho \frac {\partial v_{l}}{\partial t} \cdot \delta v_{b} d{\omega _{h}} = {\int \limits }_{\omega _{h}} \rho \frac {\partial v_{b}}{\partial t} \cdot \delta v_{l} d{\omega _{h}}= 0\) and \({\int \limits }_{\omega _{h}} \boldsymbol {s}(v_{b}) :\boldsymbol { \dot {\varepsilon }}(\delta v_{l}) d{\omega _{h}} = {\int \limits }_{\omega _{h}} \boldsymbol {s}(v_{l}) :\boldsymbol { \dot {\varepsilon }}(\delta v_{b}) d{\omega _{h}}= 0\) due to the orthogonality property of the bubble and nodal spaces. The time derivative of the velocity is approximated as follows
where Δt is the time step. Substituting Eqs. A and 31 in Eqs. A–A, the final form of the residual equations can be written on the following form:
where Rxy is the residual force vector of coupled set of unknowns x and y. The system of equations in (A) will be solved in a staggered manner. A Newton Raphson nonlinear solver is used to solve the system of the first three equations before each remeshing step. Then, the fourth equation will be solved independently. It is worth noting that the system of Eqs. 32a, 32b and 32c are condensated so that the final unknowns become the velocities and pressures at the nodes without the need to explicitly solve for the bubble velocities.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eldahshan, H., Munoz, D.P., Alves, J. et al. 3D crack initiation and propagation applied to metal forming processes. Int J Mater Form 15, 60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01702-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01702-7