Skip to main content
Log in

On the performance of substructuring implicit simulation of single point incremental forming

  • New and advanced numerical strategies for material forming: E. Cueto, C. Agelet de Saracibar, J.P. Ponthot, R. Natal Jorge
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the computational performance of the direct substructuring method. Substructuring is used to reduce the computing time in the implicit simulation of single point incremental forming (SPIF). Substructuring divides the finite element (FE) mesh into several non-overlapped substructures. The substructures are categorized into two groups: the plastic–nonlinear–substructures and the elastic–pseudo-linear–substructures. The plastic substructures assemble a part of the FE mesh that is in contact with the forming tool; they are treated by the fully nonlinear method. The elastic substructures model the elastic deformation of the rest of the FE mesh. Two approaches are used to treat the elastic substructures: the linearized approach and the condensed linearized approach. In both approaches, the geometrical and the material behaviour are assumed linear within the increment. The geometrical and material nonlinearity are considered after convergence. Combined with the plastic substructures treatment, the approaches are refered to as the plastic linear elastic (PLE) approach and the plastic condensed linear elastic approach (PCLE). The substructures categorization in plastic and elastic substructures is adapted during the simulation to capture the tool motion. Different sizes for the substructures are considered. In an example of 1600 shell elements, the best results achieved by the PLE speeding–up the classical implicit simulation by 2.82 times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. S. Matsubara. Incremental backward bulge forming of a sheet metal with a hemispherical tool. Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity, 35:1311–1316, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bambach, G. Hirt, and J. Ames. Modelling of optimization strategies in the incremental sheet metal forming process. In NUMIFORM, pages 1969–1974, 2004.

  3. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor. The finite element method for solid and structural mechanics. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 6th edition, 2005.

  4. G. Hirt, S. Junk, and N. Witulski. Incremental sheet forming: quality evaluation and process simulation. In 7th ICTP Incremental conference on Technology of Plasticity, pages 925–930, 2002.

  5. T. Belytschko, H. J. Yen, and R. Mullen. Mixed methods in time integration. Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity, 17-18:259–275, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. J. R. Hughes and W. K. Liu. Implicit-explicit finite elements in transient analysis: Implementation an numerical examples. Journal of Applied mechanics, 45:375–378, 1978.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. B. F. Smith, P. E. Bjorstad, and W. D. Gropp. Domain decomposition : parallel multilevel methods for elliptic partial differential equations. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hadoush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hadoush, A., van den Boogaard, A.H. On the performance of substructuring implicit simulation of single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 2 (Suppl 1), 559–562 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0427-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0427-7

Keywords

Navigation