Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of material models through simple machining tests

  • Symposium MS09: Machining and cutting
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accuracy of the results obtained from FEM simulation of machining operations depends on the accuracy of input data. Among these, the flow stress data of the workpiece are extremely important together with the friction along the tool-chip interface. In this study, an identification procedure for the determination of material parameters that are used for the FEM simulation of machining processes is proposed. The procedure is based on the coupling of a numerical identification procedure and Arbitrarian Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) Finite Element simulations of turning operations. An experimental campaign was developed in order to calibrate the model and to validate the procedure. The basic idea is to utilize only machining tests to properly define the material behaviour of the workpiece material, taking also into account the thermal phenomena involved in the process. The preliminary results of this analysis are discussed in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. P.L.-B. Oxley, Mechanics of Machining – An Analytical Approach to Assessing Machinability, Ellis Horwood Limited, London (1989).

  2. G.-R. Johnson, W.-H. Cook, A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Temperatures, Proceedings of the Int. Symposium on Ballistics, Netherlands, (1983) 541-547.

  3. P. Sartkulvanich, F. Koppa, T. Altan, Determination of Flow Stress for Metal Cutting Simulation – a Progress Report, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 146, (2004) 61-71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Shirakashi, K. Maekawa, E. Usui, Flow stress of low carbon steel at high temperature and strain rate (Parts III), Bulletin of the Japan Society of Precision Engineering, 16, (1983) 161-172.

  5. L. Filice, F. Micari, S. Rizzuti, D. Umbrello, Dependance of Machining Simulation Effectiveness on Material and Friction Modelling. That’s Why Industrial Application of Machining Simulation is still so far, Proceedings of the 10th Int. Workshop on Modelling of Machining Operations, Reggio Calabria, (2007) 181-187.

  6. T.H.C. Childs, Friction Modelling in Metal Cutting, Wear, 260 (3), (2006) 310-318.

  7. J. Hua, R. Shivpuri, Prediction of Chip Morphology and Segmentation during the Machining of Titanium Alloys, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 150 (1-2), (2004) 124-133.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Ahmed, A.V. Mitrofanov, V.I. Babitsky, V.V. Silberschmidt, 3D Finite Element Analysis of Ultrasonically Assisted Turning, Computational Materials Science, 39 (1), (2007) 149-154.

  9. C.-W. Mac Gregor, J.-C. Fisher, ‘A Velocity-Modified Temperature for the Plastic Flow of Metals’, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 13, (1946) 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Chinesta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chinesta, F., Filice, L., Micari, F. et al. Assessment of material models through simple machining tests. Int J Mater Form 1 (Suppl 1), 507–510 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0171-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0171-4

Key words

Navigation