Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparisons of postoperative outcomes after breast cancer surgery in patients with and without renal replacement therapy: a matched-pair cohort study using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) have more comorbidities and higher mortality and morbidity risks than the general population, surgery during breast cancer treatment is crucial because of limitations in anticancer agents for patients with renal insufficiency. We aimed to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes between patients with and without RRT.

Methods

Patients who underwent surgery for stages 0–III breast cancer between July 2010 and March 2017 were retrospectively identified in a Japanese nationwide inpatient database and divided into those with RRT (RRT group, n = 1547) and those without RRT (control group, n = 364,047). We generated a 1:4 matched-pair cohort matched for age, institution, and fiscal year at admission. We conducted multivariable regression analyses to compare postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, and anesthesia duration between the two groups.

Results

The RRT group was more likely to have comorbidities (95.0% vs. 24.1%) and undergo total mastectomy (64.2% vs. 47.0%) than the control group. The RRT group was not significantly associated with complications (odds ratio 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–1.56) and 30-day readmission (odds ratio 0.88; 95% CI 0.65–1.18), but was associated with shorter anesthesia duration (difference, − 6.8 min; 95% CI − 10.7 to − 3.0 min) compared with the control group.

Conclusions

The matched-pair cohort analyses revealed no significant differences in postoperative complications after breast cancer surgery between patients with and without RRT. Breast cancer surgery in patients with RRT may be as safe as that in patients without RRT, if comorbidities other than chronic renal failure are adequately addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LYC, Bragg-Gresham J, Balkrishnan R, et al. US renal data system 2018 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73:8–10. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.001.US.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wakasugi M, Kazama JJ, Yamamoto S, Kawamura K, Narita I. Cause-specific excess mortality among dialysis patients: comparison with the general population in Japan. Ther Apher Dial. 2013;17(3):298–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-9987.2012.01144.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lai S, Amabile MI, Bargagli MB, Musto TG, Martinez A, Testorio M, et al. Peritoneal dialysis in older adults: evaluation of clinical, nutritional, metabolic outcomes, and quality of life. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(35):e11953. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Otani Y, Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Shibuya Y, Ozaki K, Iwata J, et al. Safety and efficacy of the surgical management of hemodialysis patients with gastric cancer. Acta Med Okayama. 2017;71(4):333–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chikuda H, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Takeshita K, Kawaguchi H, Matsuda S, et al. Mortality and morbidity in dialysis-dependent patients undergoing spinal surgery: analysis of a national administrative database in Japan. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2012;94(5):433–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sirany AME, Chow CJ, Kunitake H, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA, Kwaan MR. Colorectal surgery outcomes in chronic dialysis patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(7):662–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shinkawa H, Yasunaga H, Hasegawa K, Matsui H, Michihata N, Fushimi K, et al. Mortality and morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients undergoing hemodialysis: analysis using a national inpatient database. Surgery. 2019;165(4):747–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Browne JA, Casp AJ, Cancienne JM, Werner BC. Peritoneal dialysis does not carry the same risk as hemodialysis in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2019;101(14):1271–7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanda H, Hirasaki Y, Iida T, Kanao-Kanda M, Toyama Y, Chiba T, et al. Perioperative management of patients with end-stage renal disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31(6):2251–67. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2017.04.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown JH, Vites NP, Short CD, Gokal R, Mallick NP, Hunt LP. Comparative mortality from cardiovascular disease in patients with chrome renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 1994;9(8):1136–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/9.8.1136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bednarek A, Mykała-Cieśla J, Pogoda K, Jagiello-Gruszfeld A, Kunkiel M, Winder M, et al. Limitations of systemic oncological therapy in breast cancer patients with chronic kidney disease. J Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7267083.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitai Y, Matsubara T, Funakoshi T, Horimatsu T, Muto M, Yanagita M. Cancer screening and treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease: remaining issues in the field of onco-nephrology. Ren Replace Ther. 2016;2(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-016-0046-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vinton AL, Traverse LW, Jolly PC. Wound complications after modified radical mastectomy compared with tylectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Am J Surg. 1991;161(5):584–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(91)90905-S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bertin ML, Crowe J, Gordon SM. Determinants of surgical site infection after breast surgery. Am J Infect Control. 1998;26(1):61–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-6553(98)70062-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sørensen LT, Hørby J, Friis E, Pilsgaard B, Jørgensen T. Smoking as a risk factor for wound healing and infection in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28(8):815–20. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejso.2002.1308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Witt A, Yavuz D, Walchetseder C, Strohmer H, Kubista E. Preoperative core needle biopsy as an independent risk factor for wound infection after breast surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(4):745–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00044-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Blacam C, Ogunleye AA, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, Tobias AM, Sharma R, et al. High body mass index and smoking predict morbidity in breast cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):551–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318246c294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Konishi T, Fujiogi M, Michihata N, Morita K, Matsui H, Fushimi K, et al. Impact of body mass index on outcomes following breast cancer surgery: a nationwide inpatient database study in Japan. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;20(6):e663–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2020.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Olsen MA, Lefta M, Dietz JR, Brandt KE, Aft R, Matthews R, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after major breast operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(3):326–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang DW, Reece GP, Wang B, Robb GL, Miller MJ, Evans GRD, et al. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(7):2374–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200006000-00010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Konishi T, Fujiogi M, Michihata N, Tanaka-Mizutani H, Morita K, Matsui H, et al. Breast cancer surgery in patients with schizophrenia: short-term outcomes from a nationwide cohort. Br J Surg. 2021;108(2):168–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaa070.

  22. Yasunaga H. Real world data in Japan: chapter II the diagnosis procedure combination database. Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2019;1(3):76–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamana H, Moriwaki M, Horiguchi H, Kodan M, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data. J Epidemiol. 2017;27(10):476–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.je.2016.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Inokuchi M, Kutomi G, Kijima Y, Sakai T, Sawaki M, Shien T, et al. The clinical practice guidelines for surgical treatment of breast cancer, 2018 edition. Breast Cancer. 2020;27(1):4–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-01030-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hennessy S, Bilker WB, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Factors influencing the optimal control-to-case ratio in matched case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149(2):195–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Patricia P, Robin LM. Assessing physical function and physical activity in patients with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(5):861–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Watanabe T, Kutsuna T, Yoneki K, Harada M, Shimoda T, Matsunaga Y, et al. Determinants of difficulty in activities of daily living in ambulatory patients undergoing hemodialysis. Ren Replace Ther. 2018;4:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lutz J, Menke J, Sollinger D, Schinzel H, Thürmel K. Haemostasis in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2014;29(1):29–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Omoto T, Aoki A, Maruta K, Masuda T. Surgical outcome in hemodialysis patients with active-phase infective endocarditis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;22(3):181–5. https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gajdos C, Hawn MT, Kile D, Henderson WG, Robinson T, McCarter M, et al. The risk of major elective vascular surgical procedures in patients with end-stage renal disease. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):766–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182686b87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Procter LD, Davenport DL, Bernard AC, Zweischenberger JB. General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):60–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Landercasper J, Bennie B, Bray MS, Vang CA, Linebarger JH. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy affect morbidity, mortality, reoperations, or readmissions in patients undergoing lumpectomy or mastectomy for breast cancer? Gland Surg. 2017;6(1):14–26. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2016.08.04.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Bowen ME, Mone MC, Buys SS, Sheng X, Nelson EW. Surgical outcomes for mastectomy patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2017;265(3):448–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Masakane I, Nakai S, Ogata S, Kimata N, Hanafusa N, Hamano T, et al. An overview of regular dialysis treatment in Japan (as of 31 December 2013). Ther Apher Dial. 2015;19(6):540–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.12378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Robinson BM, Akizawa T, Jager KJ, Kerr PG, Saran R, Pisoni RL. Factors affecting outcomes in patients reaching end-stage kidney disease worldwide: differences in access to renal replacement therapy, modality use, and haemodialysis practices. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30448-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Brazauskas R, Logan BR, et al. Observation studies: matching or regression? Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2016;22(3):557–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (19AA2007 and 20AA2005), and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (20H03907).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by KM, HM, and KF. The statistical analysis was carried out by TK, MF, and NM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TK and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takaaki Konishi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board at The University of Tokyo and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

The need for informed consent in the present study was waived because of the anonymity of the patient database.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 26 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konishi, T., Fujiogi, M., Michihata, N. et al. Comparisons of postoperative outcomes after breast cancer surgery in patients with and without renal replacement therapy: a matched-pair cohort study using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. Breast Cancer 28, 1112–1119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01248-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01248-7

Keywords

Navigation