Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of air exhaust location on surgical site particle distribution in an operating room

  • Research Article
  • Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates effect of exhaust outlet location on airflow and particle distribution in an operating room with laminar ventilation system (LAF) via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Four different exhaust opening configurations are comparatively examined: floor level, central level, ceiling level and floor & ceiling level. Three different particle diameters (5,10 and 20 μm) are considered for a constant value of the air change rate (30 ACH). Deposited particle numbers to operating table and to instrument table are given and compared for different particle diameters and exhaust outlet cases. It is shown that the exhaust configuration in which both floor & ceiling level air outlets employed together shows the best performance in terms of lowest particle deposition to the operating table. For this case, compared to original floor level exhaust outlet design, the total number of particles deposited on the operating table decreased by 64% for the smallest particle diameter (5 μm) and 26% for the largest particle diameter (20 μm).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aganovic A, Cao G, Stenstad LI, Skogås JG (2017). Impact of surgical lights on the velocity distribution and airborne contamination level in an operating room with laminar airflow system. Building and Environment, 126: 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agirman A, Cetin YE, Avci M, Aydin O (2019). Influence of ceiling height on airflow and particle distribution in an operating room. E3S Web of Conferences, 111: 01032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed AQ, Gao S, Kareem AK (2016). A numerical study on the effects of exhaust locations on energy consumption and thermal environment in an office room served by displacement ventilation. Energy Conversion and Management, 117: 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfonso-Sanchez JL, Martinez IM, Martin-Moreno JM, Gonzalez RS, Botia F (2017). Analyzing the risk factors influencing surgical site infections: The site of environmental factors. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 60: 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allegranzi B, Nejad SB, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, Pittet D (2011). Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 377: 228–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSYS (2013). Ansys Fluent Theory Guide. Canonsburg, PA, USA: ANSYS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balocco C, Petrone G, Cammarata G, Vitali P, Albertini R, Pasquarella C (2014). Indoor air quality in a real operating theatre under effective use conditions. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 7: 866–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belani KG, Albrecht M, McGovern PD, Reed M, Nachtsheim C (2013). Patient warming excess heat. The effects on orthopedic operating room ventilation performance. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 117:406-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrios-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, et al. (2017). Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection. JAMA Surgery, 152: 784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouilly J, Limam K, Béghein C, Allard F (2005). Effect of ventilation strategies on particle decay rates indoors: an experimental and modelling study. Atmospheric Environment, 39: 4885–4892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broex ECJ, van Asselt ADI, Bruggeman CA, van Tiel FH (2009). Surgical site infections: how high are the costs? Journal of Hospital Infection, 72: 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown BH, Smallwood RH, Barber DC, Lawford PV, Hose DR (2017). Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao G, Storas MCA, Aganovic A, Stenstad LI, Skogås JG (2018). Do surgeons and surgical facilities disturb the clean air distribution close to a surgical patient in an orthopedic operating room with laminar airflow? American Journal of Infection Control, 46: 1115–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Jiang Z, Moser A (1992). Control of airborne particle concentration and draught risk in an operating room. Indoor Air, 2: 154–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow TT, Yang XY (2003). Performance of ventilation system in a non-standard operating room. Building and Environment, 38: 1401–1411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow TT, Yang XY (2005). Ventilation performance in the operating theatre against airborne infection: numerical study on an ultra-clean system. Journal of Hospital Infection, 59: 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow TT, Lin Z, Bai W (2006). The integrated effect of medical lamp position and diffuser discharge velocity on ultra-clean ventilation performance in an operating theatre. Indoor and Built Environment, 15:315-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow TT, Wang J (2012). Dynamic simulation on impact of surgeon bending movement on bacteria-carrying particles distribution in operating theatre. Building and Environment, 57: 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diab-Elschahawi M, Berger J, Blacky A, Kimberger O, Oguz R, Kuelpmann R, Kramer A, Assadian O (2011). Impact of different-sized laminar air flow versus no laminar air flow on bacterial counts in the operating room during orthopedic surgery. American Journal of Infection Control, 39: e25–e29.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN (2008). DIN 1946-4. Ventilation and air conditioning, Part 4: Ventilation in buildings and rooms of heatlhcare. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eslami J, Abbassi A, Saidi MH, Bahrami M (2016). Effect of supply/exhaust diffuser configurations on the contaminant distribution in ultra clean environments: Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches. Energy and Buildings, 127: 648–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigley CE, Bennett JS, Khan J, Lee E (2002). Performance of deterministic workplace exposure assessment models for various contaminant source, air inlet, and exhaust locations. AIHA Journal, 63: 402–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer S, Thieves M, Hirsch T, Fischer KD, Hubert H, Beppler S, Seipp HM (2015). Reduction of airborne bacterial burden in the OR by installation of unidirectional displacement airflow (UDF) systems. Medical Science Monitor, 21: 2367–2374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry DE (2011). Fifty ways to cause surgical site infections. Surgical Infections, 12: 497–500.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds WC (1999). Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behaviour, and Measurements of Airborne Particles, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho SH, Rosario L, Rahman MM (2009). Three-dimensional analysis for hospital operating room thermal comfort and contaminant removal. Applied Thermal Engineering, 29: 2080–2092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman PN, Williams J, Stacey A, Bennett AM, Ridgway GL, Dobson C, Fraser I, Humphreys H (2002). Microbiological commissioning and monitoring of operating theatre suites. Journal of Hospital Infection, 52: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin M, Memarzadeh F, Lee K, Chen Q (2012). Experimental study of ventilation performance in laboratories with chemical spills. Building and Environment, 57: 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurelionis A, Gagyte L, Prasauskas T, Ciuzas D, Krugly E, Seduikytè L, Martuzevicius D (2015). The impact of the air distribution method in ventilated rooms on the aerosol particle dispersion and removal: The experimental approach. Energy and Buildings, 86: 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J (2012). Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 27: 61–65.e1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg AJ, Cannon T, Hamer AJ (2012). Do forced air patient-warming devices disrupt unidirectional downward airflow? The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume, 94-B: 254–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg AJ, Hamer AJ (2013). Forced-air patient warming blankets disrupt unidirectional airflow. The Bone & Joint Journal, 95-B: 407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yan Y, Shang Y, Tu J (2015). An Eulerian-Eulerian model for particulate matter transport in indoor spaces. Building and Environment, 86: 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin T, Tung Y-C, Hu S-C, Lin C-Y (2010). Effects of the removal of 0.1 urn particles in industrial cleanrooms with a fan dry coil unit (FDCU) return system. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 10: 571–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling JH (2005). Study on operating room air purification effectiveness. PhD Thesis, Tianjin University, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu DL (2010). Particle deposition onto enclosure surfaces. In: Kohli R, Mittal KL (eds), Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning: Particle Deposition, Control and Removal. Norwich, NY: William Andrew Publishing, pp. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon GP, Ingham DB, Mourshed MM (2014). Ultra clean ventilation system performance relating to airborne infections in operating theatres using CFD modelling. Building Simulation, 7: 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes JM, Bracco FV (1992). Stochastic particle dispersion modeling and the tracer-particle limit. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 4: 2809–2824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, William R (2000). Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 85: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathijssen NMC, Hannink G, Sturm PDJ, Pilot P, Bloem RM, Buma P, Petit PLC, Schreurs BW (2016). The effect of door openings on numbers of colony forming units in the operating room during hip revision surgery. Surgical Infections, 17: 535–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears SC, Blanding R, Belkoff SM (2015). Door opening affects operating room pressure during joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 38: e991–e994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memarzadeh F, Jiang Z (2004). Effect of operation room geometry and ventilation system parameter variations on the protection of the surgical site. In: Proceedings of IAQ Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memarzadeh F, Xu W (2012). Role of air changes per hour (ACH) in possible transmission of airborne infections. Building Simulation, 5: 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble WC (1975). Dispersal of skin microorganisms. British Journal of Dermatology, 93: 477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble WC (1976). Dispersal of bacteria from human skin. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Contamination Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond-Bryant J, Eisner AD, Brixey LA, Wiener RW (2006). Transport of airborne particles within a room. Indoor Air, 16: 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano F, Marocco L, Gustén I, Joppolo CM (2015). Numerical and experimental analysis of airborne particles control in an operating theater. Building and Environment, 89: 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadrizadeh S, Holmberg S, Tammelin A (2014a). A numerical investigation of vertical and horizontal laminar airflow ventilation in an operating room. Building and Environment, 82: 517–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadrizadeh S, Tammelin A, Ekolind P, Holmberg S (2014b). Influence of staff number and internal constellation on surgical site infection in an operating room. Particuology, 13: 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadrizadeh S, Holmberg S (2015). How safe is it to neglect thermal radiation in indoor environment modeling with high ventilation rates? In: Proceedings of the 36th AIVC, 5th TightVent & 3rd venticool Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santa Cruz A, Coste N, Makhloufi R, Guillou S, Delboulbé E, Tiffonnet A-L, Marion M (2011). Airflow inside an open ventilated system: Influence of operator's arms or moving conveyor. Journal of Food Engineering, 105: 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih T-H, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1995). A new k-e eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, 24: 227–238.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EB, Raphael IJ, Maltenfort MG, Honsawek S, Dolan K, Younkins EA (2013). The effect of laminar air flow and door openings on operating room contamination. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 28: 1482–1485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srebric J, Vukovic V, He G, Yang X (2008). CFD boundary conditions for contaminant dispersion, heat transfer and airflow simulations around human occupants in indoor environments. Building and Environment, 43: 294–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey A, Humphreys H (2002). A UK historical perspective on operating theatre ventilation. Journal of Hospital Infection, 52: 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teter J, Guajardo I, Al-Rammah T, Rosson G, Perl TM, Manahan M (2017). Assessment of operating room airflow using air particle counts and direct observation of door openings. American Journal of Infection Control, 45: 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2016). Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte W, Hodgson R, Tinkler J (1982). The importance of airborne bacterial contamination of wounds. Journal of Hospital Infection, 3: 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte W, Shaw BH (1974). The effect of obstructions and thermals in laminar-flow systems. Journal of Hygiene, 72: 415–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y, Xu W, Gupta J, Guity A, Marmion P, Manning A, Gulick B, Zhang X, Chen Q (2009). Experimental study on displacement and mixing ventilation systems for a patient ward. HVAC&R Research, 15: 1175–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamuner N (1986). Operating room environment with turbulent airflow. ASHRAE Transactions, 92: 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai ZJ, Osborne AL (2013). Simulation-based feasibility study of improved air conditioning systems for hospital operating room. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2: 468–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Chen Q (2006). Experimental measurements and numerical simulations of particle transport and distribution in ventilated rooms. Atmospheric Environment, 40: 3396–3408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Chen Q (2007). Comparison of the Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for predicting particle transport in enclosed spaces. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 5236–5248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Tu G, Ling J (2008). Study on biological contaminant control strategies under different ventilation models in hospital operating room. Building and Environment, 43: 793–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Yang C, Yang X, Liu S (2008). Particle dispersion and deposition in ventilated rooms: Testing and evaluation of different Eulerian and Lagrangian models. Building and Environment, 43: 388–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoon WAC, van der Heijden MGM, Loomans MGLC, Hensen JLM (2010). On the applicability of the laminar flow index when selecting surgical lighting. Building and Environment, 45: 1976–1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunus Emre Cetin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agirman, A., Cetin, Y.E., Avci, M. et al. Effect of air exhaust location on surgical site particle distribution in an operating room. Build. Simul. 13, 979–988 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0642-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0642-1

Keywords

Navigation