Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulations on explosion of leaked liquefied petroleum gas in a garage

  • Research Article
  • Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An explosion while repairing liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) taxis in a garage located at the ground level of an old residential building constructed in Hong Kong was reported in 2015. Part of the building structures was damaged with the owners staying inside killed. The cause of explosion is still under investigation, but the explosion source can be due to leaking of LPG fuel or flammable clean refrigerants with LPG. A taxi has over 0.5 kg of refrigerant HFC134a (R134a) stored in the air-conditioning unit. A pressure rise exceeding 21 kPa (or 0.21 bar) due to explosion from a small amount of LPG would give damages to the building. As firefighters are always exposing themselves to the risk of explosion when they are carrying out rescue operation in a gas-filled environment, the explosion overpressure has to be more reliably estimated for working out protection schemes during operation. This garage LPG explosion incident was studied numerically using Computational Fluid Dynamics software FLame ACceleration Simulation (FLACS). Three scenarios of different LPG-air mixture volumes and LPG concentrations were investigated. Dispersion of LPG was simulated first with an ignition taken at a position at the garage centre. Overpressure and temperature rise were predicted using a fine grid system with 1 657 600 computing cells was employed. Results were compared with numerical predictions using coarse grids of 207 200 cells. Discussion and conclusions were made with reference to the threshold value of 21 kPa in overpressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bleyer A, Taveau J, Djebaili-Chaumeix N, Paillard CE, Bentaib A (2012). Comparison between FLACS explosion simulations and experiments conducted in a PWR Steam Generator casemate scale down with hydrogen gradients. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 245: 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinska D (2016). Safety concept for underground garages open for cars powered by LPG—Results of real scale tests. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Warsaw, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland IG (1980). Explosions of gas layers in a room size chamber. IChemE Symposium Series no. 58, pp. 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai N, Chow WK (2014). Numerical studies on heat release rate in a room fire burning wood and liquid fuel. Building Simulation, 7: 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catlin CA, Fairweather M, Ibrahim SS (1995). Predictions of turbulent, premixed flame propagation in explosion tubes. Combustion and Flame, 102: 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu C-W, Chen C-H, Chen J-C, Shu C-M (2013). Analyses of smoke management models in TFT-LCD cleanroom. Building Simulation, 6: 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow CL, Chow WK (2009). Fire safety aspects of refuge floors in supertall buildings with computational fluid dynamics, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15: 225–236.

  • Chow WK (2015). Gas explosion in residential buildings to watch. Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Available at: http://www.bse.polyu.edu.hk/researchCentre/Fire_Engineering/Hot_Issues/20150128-LPGExp14-1n.pdf.

  • Chow WK, Huo Y (2015). Alerting gas explosions in buildings: LPG as fuel or for air-conditioner? Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Available at: http://www.bse.polyu.edu.hk/researchCentre/Fire_Engineering/Hot_Issues/20151202-SNGasExp15-1p.pdf

  • Dobashi R (1997). Experimental study on gas explosion behaviour in enclosure. Journal of Loss Prevention Industries, 10: 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung FWY, Ng J, Cheung E, Mok D (2014, November 23). “It was like thunder”: Residents describe gas blast that killed one and left firemen fighting for their lives. South China Morning Post.

  • GexConAS (2009). FLACS v9.0 User’s Manual. Bergen, Norway.

  • Hansen OR, Gavelli F, Ichard M, Davis SG (2010). Validation of FLACS against experimental data sets from the model evaluation database for LNG vapor dispersion. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23: 857–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen OR, Ichard M, Davis SG (2009). Validation of FLACS for vapor dispersion from LNG spills: Model evaluation protocol. In: Proceedings of Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris RJ, Wickens MJ (1989). Understanding vapour-cloud explosions— An experimental study. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Gas Engineers 55th Autumn Meeting, Communication 1408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugom GP, Friis-Hansen P (2010). Risk modelling of a hydrogen refuelling station using Bayesian network. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36: 2389–2397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health and Safety Laboratory (2010). Review of FLACS 9.0, Health and Safety Executive, The Government of United Kingdom.

  • Hjertager BH (1982). Simulation of transient compressible turbulent reactive flows. Combustion Science and Technology, 27: 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjertager BH (1993). Computer modelling of turbulent gas explosions in complex 2D and 3D geometries. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 34: 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjertager BH, Solberg T (1999). A review of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling of gas explosions. In: Zarko VE, Weiser V, Eisenreich N, Vasil’ev AA (eds), Prevention of Hazardous Fires and Explosions. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 77–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huo Y, Ng YW, Chow WK (2016). A study on gas explosions in buildings: LPG as fuel or for air-conditioner? Paper presented at CLIMA2016, Aalborg, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichard M, Geiser J, Gavelli F (2012). CFD simulation of the Falcon tests using the homogeneous equilibrium model in FLACS. In: Proceedings of the 8th Global Congress on Process Safety, Houston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo YD, Kim JY (2001). Explosion hazard analysis in partially confined area. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 18: 292–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo YD, Park KS (2004). Minimum amount of flammable gas for explosion within a confined space. Process Safety Progress, 23: 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lands Department (2016). Available at http://www1.map.gov.hk/gih3/view/index.jsp.Accessed 3 Jan 2016.

  • Lo C, Nip A (2013, January 10). Fireball rips through Ma On Shan restaurant, injuring 21. South China Morning Post.

  • Middha P, Hansen OR, Grune J, Kotchourko A (2010). CFD calculations of gas leak dispersion and subsequent gas explosions: Validation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 179: 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen IO (1982). The influence of turbulence on flame propagation in obstacle environments. In: Lee JHS, Guirao CM (eds), Fuel-Air Explosions: Proceedings of the International Conference on Fuel-Air Explosions. Waterloo, Cananda: University of Waterloo Press, pp. 101–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen IO, Donato M, Knystautas R, Lee JHS (1980). Flame acceleration due to turbulence produced by obstacles. Combustion and Flame, 39: 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Occupational Safety & Health Council (2016). LPG Safety. Available at http://www.oshc.org.hk/download/publishings/1/302/36.htm. Accessed 3 Jan 2016.

  • Ogle RA (1999). Explosion hazard analysis for an enclosure partially filled with a flammable gas. Process Safety Progress, 18: 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paik JK, Kim BJ, Jeong JS, Kim SH, Jang YS, Kim GS, Woo JH, Kim YS, Chun MJ, Shin YS, Czujko J (2010). CFD simulations of gas explosion and fire actions. Ships and Offshore Structures, 5: 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patankar SV (1981). Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. New York: McGraw Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen HH, Tomlin G, Middha P, Phylaktou HN, Andrews GE (2013). Modelling large-scale vented gas explosions in a twincompartment enclosure. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26: 1604–1615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popat NR, Catlin CA, Arntzen BJ, Lindstedt RP, Hjertager BH, Solberg T, Saeter O, van den Berg AC (1996). Investigations to improve and assess the accuracy of computational fluid dynamic based explosion models. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 45: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard DK, Freeman DJ, Guilbert PW (1996). Prediction of explosion pressures in confined spaces. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 9: 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siu P, Mok D (2015, April 27). Garage explosion in Wong Tai Sin leaves three dead, nine injured. South China Morning Post.

  • Skarsbø LR (2011). An experimental study of pool fires and validation of different CFD fire models. Master Thesis, University of Bergen, Norway.

  • South China Morning Post (2002, October 31). 3 die as blast trigger fireball in tower block.

  • The Sun (2015, January 8). 47 gas leakage fire and explosion within 5 year.

  • van der Heijden MGM, Loomans MGLC, Lemaire AD, Hensen JLM (2013). Fire safety assessment of semi-open car parks based on validated CFD simulations. Building Simulation, 6: 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyazmina E, Jallais S (2016). Validation and recommendations for FLACS CFD and engineering approaches to model hydrogen vented explosions: Effects of concentration, obstruction vent area and ignition position. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41: 15101–15109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh BP, Snodgrass RE, Black WZ (2017). Thermodynamic Model for Gas Explosions in Vented and Non-Vented Enclosures. Combustion Science and Technology, 189: 366–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this article was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the project “A study on explosion hazards of clean refrigerant propane leaking from air-conditioning units in small commercial flats” (PolyU 152034/14E) with account number B-Q42U and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51676051).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan-ki Chow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ng, Y.W., Huo, Y., Chow, Wk. et al. Numerical simulations on explosion of leaked liquefied petroleum gas in a garage. Build. Simul. 10, 755–768 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0366-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0366-z

Keywords

Navigation