Abstract
Air cleaners are expected to improve the indoor air quality by removing the gaseous contaminants and fine particles. In our former work, the effects of the air cleaner on removing the uniformly distributed particles were numerically investigated. Based on those results, this work further explores the performances of the air cleaner in the reduction of two nonuniform particle distributions generated by smoking and coughing. The Lagrangian discrete trajectory model combined with the Eulerian fluid method is employed to simulate the airflow pattern and particle transport in a room. In general, the results show that the particle fates have been resulted from the interaction between the emitting source and the air cleaner. And the position of the air cleaner is a key parameter affecting the particle concentration, for which a shorter distance between the air cleaner and the human body corresponds to a lower concentration. Besides, the air velocity emitted from the human mouth and the orientation of the air cleaner can also influence the transport of particles.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ANSYS (2009). ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 Theory Guide. Canonsburg, PA, USA: ANSYS Inc.
Ardkapan SR, Afshari A, Bergsøe NC, Nielsen P (2014). Evaluation of air cleaning technologies existing in the Danish market: Experiments in a duct and in a test room. Indoor and Built Environment, 23: 1177–1186.
Cao S-J, Meyers J (2015). Fast prediction of indoor pollutant dispersion based on reduced-order ventilation models. Building Simulation, 8: 415–420.
Chen C, Zhao B, Cui W, Dong L, An N, Ouyang X (2010). The effectiveness of an air cleaner in controlling droplet/aerosol particle dispersion emitted from a patient’s mouth in the indoor environment of dental clinics. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7:1105–1118.
Chen Y, Ebenstein A, Greenstone M, Li HB (2013). Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 110: 12936–12941.
Dockery DW, Pope CA, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BJ, Speizer FE (1993). An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329: 1753–1759.
Gao N, Niu J (2004). CFD study on micro-environment around human body and personalized ventilation. Building and Environment, 39: 795–805.
Ge Q, Li X, Inthavong K, Tu J (2013). Numerical study of the effects of human body heat on particle transport and inhalation in indoor environment. Building and Environment, 59: 1–9.
Hörschler I, Schröder W, Meinke M (2010). On the assumption of steadiness of nasal cavity flow. Journal of Biomechanics, 43: 1081–1085.
Jin X, Yang L, Du X, Yang Y (2015). Particle transport characteristics in indoor environment with an air cleaner. Indoor and Built Environment, doi: 10.1177/1420326X15592253.
Kang SY, Siegel J, Novoselac A (2008). Effective positioning of portable air cleaning devices in multizone residential buildings. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, Robinson JP, Tsang AM, Switzer P, Behar JV, Hern SC, Engelmann WH (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 11: 231–252.
Lai ACK, Chen F (2006). Modeling particle deposition and distribution in a chamber with a two-equation Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes model. Journal of Aerosol Science, 37: 1770–1780.
Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974). The numerical computation of turbulent flow. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3: 269.
Lu WZ, Howarth AT, Adam N, Riffat SB (1996). Modelling and measurement of airflow and aerosol particle distribution in a ventilated two-zone chamber. Building and Environment, 31: 417–423.
Miller SL, Nazaroff WW (2001). Environmental tobacco smoke particles in multizone indoor environments. Atmospheric Environment, 35: 2053–2067.
Nazaroff WW (2000). Effectiveness of air cleaning technologies. In: Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2000, 8th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Espoo, Finland.
Nelson PR, Sears SB, Heavner DL (1993). Application of methods for evaluating air cleaner performance. Indoor and Built Environment, 2: 111–117.
Ongwandee M, Kruewan A (2013). Evaluation of portable household and in-car air cleaners for air cleaning potential and ozoneinitiated pollutants. Indoor and Built Environment, 22: 659–668
Qian H, Li Y, Sun H, Nielsen PV, Huang X, Zheng X (2010). Particle removal efficiency of the portable HEPA air cleaner in a simulated hospital ward. Building Simulation, 3: 215–224.
Shaughnessy RJ, Sextro RG (2006). What is an effective portable air cleaning device? A review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 3: 169–181.
Wang Y, James PW (1999). On the effect of anisotropy on the turbulent dispersion and deposition of small particles. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 25: 551–558.
Wei J, Li Y (2015). Enhanced spread of expiratory droplets by turbulence in a cough jet. Building and Environment, 93: 86–96.
Zhao B, Zhang Y, Li X, Yang X, Huang D (2004). Comparison of indoor aerosol particle concentration and deposition in different ventilated rooms by numerical method. Building and Environment, 39: 1–8.
Zhao B, Zhang Z, Li X (2005). Numerical study of the transport of droplets or particles generated by respiratory system indoors. Building and Environment, 40: 1032–1039.
Zhang T, Wang S, Sun G, Xu L, Takaoka D (2010). Flow impact of an air conditioner to portable air cleaning. Building and Environment, 45: 2047–2056.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Jin, X., Yang, L. et al. Particle transport characteristics in indoor environment with an air cleaner: The effect of nonuniform particle distributions. Build. Simul. 10, 123–133 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0310-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0310-7