Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of RANS turbulence models for simulating wind-induced mean pressures and dispersions around a complex-shaped high-rise building

  • Research Article
  • Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Re-ingestion of the contaminated exhaust air from the same building is a concern in high-rise residential buildings, and can be serious depending on wind conditions and contaminant source locations. In this paper, we aim to assess the prediction accuracy of three k-ɛ turbulence models, in numerically simulating the wind-induced pressure and indoor-originated air pollutant dispersion around a complex-shaped high-rise building, by comparing with our earlier wind tunnel test results. The building modeled is a typical, 33-story tower-like building consisting of 8-household units on each floor, and 4 semi-open, vertical re-entrant spaces are formed, with opposite household units facing each other in very close proximity. It was found that the predicted surface pressure distributions by the two revised k-ɛ models, namely the renormalized and realizable k-ɛ models agree reasonably with experimental data. However, with regard to the vertical pollutant concentration distribution in the windward re-entrance space, obvious differences were found between the three turbulence models, and the simulation result using the realizable k-ɛ model agreed the best with the experiment. On the other hand, with regard to the vertical pollutant concentration distribution in the re-entrant space oblique to the wind, all the three models gave acceptable predictions at the concentration level above the source location, but severely underestimated the downward dispersion. The effects of modifying the value of the turbulent Schmidt number in the realizable k-ɛ model were also examined for oblique-wind case. It was confirmed that the numerical results, especially the downward dispersion, are quite sensitive to the value of turbulent Schmidt number.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asfour OS, Gadi MB (2007). A Comparison between CFD and network models for predicting wind-driven ventilation in buildings. Building and Environment, 42: 4079–4085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Standard (1989). Minimum Design Loads on Structures. AS1170.2-1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein JA, Alexis N, Barnes C, Bernstein IL, Nel A, Peden D, Diaz-Sanchez D, Tarlo SM, Williams PB, Bernstein JA (2004). Health effects of air pollution. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 114: 1116–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Saathoff P, Wang X (2008). Numerical evaluation of pollutant dispersion in the built environment: Comparisons between models and experiments. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 1817–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocken B, Stathopoulos T (2010). Evaluation of CFD for simulating air pollutant dispersion around buildings. ASHRAE Transactions, 116(2): 597–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J, Hensen JLM (2011). Application of CFD in building performance simulation for the outdoor environment: an overview. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4: 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britter R, Hanna S (2003). Flow and dispersion in urban areas. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 35: 469–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunekreef B, Holgate ST (2002). Air pollution and health. Lancet, 360: 1233–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett J, Bojic M, Yik F (2005). Wind-induced pressure at external surfaces of a high-rise residential building in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 40: 765–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez M, Hajra B, Stathopoulos T, Bahloul A (2011). Near-field pollutant dispersion in the built environment by CFD and wind tunnel simulations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99: 330–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CCK, Lam KM, Yuen RKK, Lo SM, Liang J (2007). A study of natural ventilation in a refuge floor. Building and Environment, 42: 3322–3332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson MJ, Mylne KR, Jones CD, Phillips JC, Perkins RJ, Fung JCH, Hunt JCR (1995). Plume dispersion through large groups of obstacles—A field investigation. Atmospheric Environment, 29: 3245–3256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson MJ, Snyder WH, Lawson JRE, Hunt JCR (1996). Wind tunnel simulations of plume dispersion through groups of obstacles. Atmospheric Environment, 30: 3715–3731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluent (2006). Fluent 6.3 User’s guide. Fluent Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlünzen H, Carissino B (2007). Best Practice Guideline for the CFD Simulation of Flows in the Urban Environment. Brussels: COST Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gousseau P, Blocken B, van Heijst GJF (2011a). CFD simulation of pollutant dispersion around isolated buildings: On the role of convective and turbulent mass fluxes in the prediction accuracy. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 194: 422–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gousseau P, Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, van Heijst GJF (2011b). CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion on a high-resolution grid: A case study by LES and RANS for a building group in downtown Montreal. Atmospheric Environment, 45: 428–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gousseau P, Blocken B, van Heijst GJF (2012). Large-eddy simulation of pollutant dispersion around a cubical building: Analysis of the turbulent mass transport mechanism by unsteady concentration and velocity statistics. Environmental Pollution, 167: 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighat F, Mirzaei PA (2011). Impact of non-uniform urban surface temperature on pollution dispersion in urban areas. Building Simulation, 4: 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajra B, Stathopoulos T, Bahloul A (2011). The effect of upstream buildings on near-field pollutant dispersion in the built environment. Atmospheric Environment, 45: 4930–4940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RC (1997). Dispersion of releases of hazardous materials in the vicinity of buildings: Phase II—CFD modelling. Contract Research Report 127/1997. Suffolk UK: The Health and Safety Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Li QS, Xu S (2007). Numerical evaluation of wind effects on a tall steel building by CFD. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63: 612–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koeltzsch K (2000). The height dependence of the turbulent Schmidt number within the boundary layer. Atmospheric Environment, 34: 1147–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974). The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3: 269–289.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leung KK, Liu CH, Wong CCC, Lo JCY, Ng GCT (2012). On the study of ventilation and pollutant removal over idealized two-dimensional urban street canyons. Building Simulation, 5: 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XX, Liu CH, Leung DYC, Lam KM (2006). Recent progress in CFD modelling of wind field and pollutant transport in street canyons. Atmospheric Environment, 40: 5640–5658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Stathopoulos T (1997). Numerical evaluation of wind-induced dispersion of pollutants around a building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 67–68: 757–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Stathopoulos T, (1998). Computational evaluation of pollutant dispersion around buildings: Estimation of numerical errors. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 77–78: 619–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XP, Niu JL, Kwok KCS, Wang JH, Li BZ (2010). Investigation of indoor air pollutant dispersion and cross-contamination around a typical high-rise residential building: Wind tunnel tests. Building and Environment, 45: 1769–1778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XP, Niu JL, Kwok KCS (2011). Analysis of concentration fluctuations about hazardous gas dispersion around high-rise building for different incident wind directions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 192: 1623–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubcke H, Schmidt St., Rung T, Thiele F (2001). Comparison of LES and RANS in bluff-body flows. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 89: 1471–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavroidis I, Andronopoulos S, Bartzis JG, Griffiths RF (2007). Atmospheric dispersion in the presence of a three-dimensional cubical obstacle: Modelling of mean concentration and concentration fluctuations. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 2740–2756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroney RN, Leitl BM, Rafailidis S, Schatzmann M (1999). Wind tunnel and numerical modelling of flow and dispersion about several building shapes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 81: 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroney RN (2004). Wind tunnel and numerical simulation of pollution dispersion: a hybrid approach. Working paper, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mfula AM, Kukadia V, Griffiths RF, Hall DJ (2003). Wind tunnel modelling of urban building exposure to outdoor pollution. Atmospheric Environment, 39: 2737–2745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu J, Tung TCW (2008). On-site quantification of re-entry ratio of ventilation exhausts in multi-family residential buildings and implications. Indoor Air, 18: 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber JS, Prohonic JE, Smead G (2001). Residential exposure to volatile organic compounds from nearby commercial facilities. In: Spengler JD, Samet JM, McCarthy JF (eds), Indoor Air Quality Handbook, Chapter 66. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sada K, Sato A (2002). Numerical calculation of flow and stack-gas concentration fluctuation around a cubical building. Atmospheric Environment, 36: 5527–5534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos JM, Reis NC, Goulart EV, Mavroidis I (2009). Numerical simulation of flow and dispersion around an isolated cubical building: The effect of the atmospheric stratification. Atmospheric Environment, 43: 5484–5492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1995). A new k- e eddy-viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows—Model development and validation. Computers Fluids, 24: 227–238.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding DB (1971). Concentration fluctuations in a round turbulent free jet. Chemical Engineering Science, 26: 95–107.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stathopoulos T, Lazure L, Saathoff P, Wei X (2002). Dilution of exhaust from a rooftop stack on a cubical building in an urban environment. Atmospheric Environment, 36: 4577–4591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Murakami S, Sawaki S (2008). Comparison of various revised κ-ɛ models and LES applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1:1:2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T (2007). Turbulent Schmidt numbers for CFD analysis with various types of flowfield. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 8091–8099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T (2009). Numerical simulation of dispersion around an isolated cubic building: Comparison of various types of k-e models. Atmospheric Environment, 43: 3200–3210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doormaal JP, Raithby GD (1984). Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numerical Heat Transfer, 7: 147–163.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JH, Niu JL, Liu XP, Yu CWF (2010). Assessment of pollutant dispersion in the re-entrance space of a high-rise residential building, Using Wind Tunnel Simulations. Indoor and Built Environment, 19: 638–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, McNamara KF (2006). Evaluation of CFD simulation using RANS turbulence models for building effects on pollutant dispersion. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 6: 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakhot V, Orszag SA, Thangam S, Gatski TB, Speziale CG (1992). Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. Physics of Fluids A, 4: 1510–1520.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshie R, Jiang G, Shirasawa T, Chung J (2011). CFD simulations of gas dispersion around high-rise building in non-isothermal boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99: 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Gu M (2008). Wind tunnel tests and numerical simulations of wind pressures on buildings in staggered arrangement. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 2067–2079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianlei Niu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Niu, J. & Kwok, K.C.S. Evaluation of RANS turbulence models for simulating wind-induced mean pressures and dispersions around a complex-shaped high-rise building. Build. Simul. 6, 151–164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-012-0097-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-012-0097-0

Keywords

Navigation