Abstract
In the event of a toxic chemical release to the atmosphere, shelter-in-place (SIP) is an emergency response option available to protect public health. This paper is the last in a three-part series that examines the effectiveness of SIP at reducing adverse health effects in communities. We model a hypothetical chemical release in an urban area, and consider SIP effectiveness in protecting occupants of commercial buildings. Building air infiltration rates are predicted from empirical data using an existing model. We consider the distribution of building air infiltration rates both with mechanical ventilation systems turned off and with the systems operating. We also consider the effects of chemical sorption to indoor surfaces and nonlinear chemical dose-response relationships. We find that commercial buildings provide effective shelter when ventilation systems are off, but that any delay in turning off ventilation systems can greatly reduce SIP effectiveness. Using a two-zone model, we find that there can be substantial benefit by taking shelter in the inner parts of a building that do not experience direct air exchange with the outdoors. Air infiltration rates vary substantially among buildings and this variation is important in quantifying effectiveness for emergency response. Community-wide health metrics, introduced in the previous papers in this series, can be applied in pre-event planning and to guide real-time emergency response.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chan WR, Nazaroff WW, Price PN, Gadgil AJ (2007)a. Effectiveness of urban shelter-in-place. I: Idealized conditions. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 4962–4976.
Chan WR, Nazaroff WW, Price PN, Gadgil AJ (2007)b. Effectiveness of urban shelter-in-place. II: Residential districts. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 7082–7095.
Cummings JB, Withers CR, Moyer N, Fairey P, McKendry B (1996). Final report: uncontrolled air flow in non-residential buildings. FSEC-CR-878-96. Cocoa, FL: Florida Solar Energy Center.
Ermak DL, Nasstrom JS (2000). A Lagrangian stochastic diffusion model for inhomogeneous turbulence. Atmospheric Environment, 34: 1059–1068.
Grosso M (1992). Wind pressure distribution around buildings: a parametrical model. Energy and Buildings, 18: 101–131.
Grot RA, Persily AK (1986). Measured air infiltration and ventilation rates in eight large office buildings. In: Trechsel HR, Lagus PL (eds.), Measured Air Leakage of Buildings (pp. 151–183). ASTM STP 904. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.
Hayakawa S, Togari S (1990). Simple test method for evaluating exterior wall airtightness of tall office buildings. In: Sherman MH (ed.), Air Change and Airtightness in Buildings (pp. 231–245). ASTM STP 1067. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.
Karlsson E, Huber U (1996). Influence of desorption on the indoor concentration of toxic gases. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 49: 15–27.
Lagus PL, Grot RA (1995). Consultant report: air change rates in non-residential buildings in California. Lagus Applied Technology, Inc., P400-91-034BCN. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission.
McWilliams JA (2002). Review of airflow measurement techniques. Annotated Bibliography 12. Coventry, UK: Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre.
NICS (2003). Shelter in place at your office—a general guide for preparing a shelter in place plan in the workplace. Charleston, WV: National Institute for Chemical Studies.
NIOSH (2003). Guidance for filtration and air-cleaning systems to protect building environments. Washington, DC: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
NRC (2003). Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals: Volume 3. Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, National Research Council. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Orme M, Liddament M, Wilson A (1994). An analysis and data summary of the AIVC’s numerical database. Technical Note 44. Coventry, UK: Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre.
Persily AK (1999). Myths about building envelopes. ASHRAE Journal, March, 39–47.
Persily AK, Ivy EM (2001). Input data for multizone airflow and IAQ analysis. NISTIR 6585. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Persily AK, Gorfain J, Brunner G (2006). Survey of ventilation rates in office buildings. Building Research and Information, 34: 459–466.
Price PN, Chang SC, Sohn MD (2004). Characterizing buildings for airflow models: what should we measure? LBNL-55321. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Price PN, Shehabi A, Chan WR (2006). Indoor-outdoor air leakage of apartments and commercial buildings. PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research Program. CEC-500-2006-111. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission.
Proskiw G, Phillips B (2001). Air leakage characteristics, test methods, and specifications for large buildings. Ottawa, Canada: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
Ratti C, Di Sabatino S, Britter R, Brown M, Caton F, Burian S (2002). Analysis of 3-D urban databases with respect to pollution dispersion for a number of European and American cities. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus, 2: 459–469.
Sabiha AG, Devaull J, Salmi D, Biagi A, Grek K, Nelson T (2001). Model emergency plan for schools. Martinez, CA: Contra Costa County Community Awareness & Emergency Response (CAER) Group.
Shaw CY, Tamura GT (1977). The calculation of air infiltration rates caused by wind and stack action for tall buildings. ASHRAE Transactions, 83(2): 145–158.
Shaw CY (1979). A method for predicting air infiltration rates for a tall building surrounded by lower structures of uniform height. ASHRAE Transactions, 85(1): 72–84.
Shaw CY (1980). Wind and temperature induced pressure differentials and an equivalent pressure difference model for predicting air infiltration in schools. ASHRAE Transactions, 86(1): 268–279.
Sherman MH, Grimsrud DT (1980). Measurement of infiltration using fan pressurization and weather data. LBNL-10852. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Sherman MH, Chan WR (2006). Building air tightness: research and practice. In: Santamouris M, Wouters P (eds.), Building Ventilation: The State of the Art (pp. 137–162). London, UK: Earthscan
Tamura GT, Wilson AG (1966). Pressure differences for a nine-story building as a result of chimney effect and ventilation system operation. ASHRAE Transactions, 72(1): 180–189.
Tamura GT, Wilson AG (1967). Pressure differences caused by chimney effect in three high buildings. ASHRAE Transactions, 73(2): 1.1–1.10.
Ten Berge WF, Zwart A, Appelman LM (1986). Concentration-time mortality response relationship of irritant and systemically acting vapours and gases. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 13: 301–309.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, W.R., Nazaroff, W.W., Price, P.N. et al. Effectiveness of urban shelter-in-place. III: Commercial districts. Build. Simul. 1, 144–157 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-008-8312-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-008-8312-8