Abstract
Recent advances in the search for novel anticancer agents have indicated that the positively charged antimicrobial peptides have emerged as promising agents offering several advantages over the conventional anticancer drugs. As a naturally occurring, cationic, α-helical antimicrobial peptide, temproin-1CEa has been proved to exhibit a potent anticancer effect and a moderate hemolytic activity. In order to reduce the hemolytic activity of temporin-1CEa and improve its anticancer potency towards a range of human breast cancer cells, in the present study, six analogs of temporin-1CEa were rationally designed and synthesized. The amphipathicity levels and α-helical structural patterns of peptides were reserved, while their cationic property and hydrophobicity were changed. The results of MTT and hemolysis assay indicated that the analog peptides displayed an improved anticancer activity and showed an overall optimized therapeutic index. The hydrophobicity of peptides was positively correlated with their hemolytic and antitumor activities. Moreover, the data suggest a strategy of increasing the cationicity while maintaining the moderate hydrophobicity of naturally occurring amphipathic α-helical peptides to generate analogs with improved cytotoxicity against tumor cells but decreased activity against non-neoplastic cells such as human erythrocytes. This work highlights the potential for rational design and synthesis of improved antimicrobial peptides that have the capability to be used therapeutically for treatment of cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ausbacher, D., G. Svineng, T. Hansen, and M.B. Strøm. 2012. Anticancer mechanisms of action of two small amphipathic β(2,2)-amino acid derivatives derived from antimicrobial peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1818: 2917–2925.
Carver, T., and A. Bleasby. 2003. The design of Jemboss: A graphical user interface to EMBOSS. Bioinformatics 19: 1837–1843.
Chen, Y., M.T. Guarnieri, A.I. Vasil, M.L. Vasil, C.T. Mant, and R.S. Hodges. 2007. Role of peptide hydrophobicity in the mechanism of action of alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 51: 1398–1406.
Chen, Y., C.T. Mant, and R.S. Hodges. 2002. Determination of stereochemistry stability coefficients of amino acid side-chains in an amphipathic alpha-helix. Journal of Peptide Research 59: 18–33.
Chen, Y., A.I. Vasil, L. Rehaume, C.T. Mant, J.L. Burns, M.L. Vasil, R.E. Hancock, and R.S. Hodges. 2006. Comparison of biophysical and biologic properties of alpha-helical enantiomeric antimicrobial peptides. Chemical Biology & Drug Design 67: 162–173.
Dathe, M., T. Wieprecht, H. Nikolenko, L. Handel, W.L. Maloy, D.L. MacDonald, M. Beyermann, and M. Bienert. 1997. Hydrophobicity, hydrophobic moment and angle subtended by charged residues modulate antibacterial and haemolytic activity of amphipathic helical peptides. FEBS Letters 403: 208–212.
Eisenberg, D., R.M. Weiss, and T.C. Terwilliger. 1982. The helical hydrophobic moment: A measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix. Nature 299: 371–374.
Hancock, R.E., and H.G. Sahl. 2006. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nature Biotechnology 24: 1551–1557.
Hoskin, D.W., and A. Ramamoorthy. 2008. Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1778: 357–375.
Huang, Y.B., X.F. Wang, H.Y. Wang, Y. Liu, and Y. Chen. 2011. Studies on mechanism of action of anticancer peptides by modulation of hydrophobicity within a defined structural framework. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 10: 416–426.
Jemal, A., R. Siegel, E. Ward, T. Murray, J. Xu, C. Smigal, and M.J. Thun. 2006. Cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 56: 106–130.
Jenssen, H., P. Hamill, and R.E. Hancock. 2006. Peptide antimicrobial agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 19: 491–511.
Jiang, Z., A.I. Vasil, L. Gera, M.L. Vasil, and R.S. Hodges. 2011. Rational design of α-helical antimicrobial peptides to target Gram-negative pathogens, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Utilization of charge, ‘specificity determinants’, total hydrophobicity, hydrophobe type and location as design parameters to improve the therapeutic ratio. Chemical Biology & Drug Design 77: 225–240.
Kovacs, J.M., C.T. Mant, and R.S. Hodges. 2006. Determination of intrinsic hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of amino acid side chains in peptides in the absence of nearest-neighbor or conformational effects. Biopolymers 84: 283–297.
Leuschner, C., and W. Hansel. 2004. Membrane disrupting lytic peptides for cancer treatments. Current Pharmaceutical Design 10: 2299–2310.
Mader, J.S., and D.W. Hoskin. 2006. Cationic antimicrobial peptides as novel cytotoxic agents for cancer treatment. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 15: 933–946.
Mant, C.T., J.M. Kovacs, H.M. Kim, D.D. Pollock, and R.S. Hodges. 2009. Intrinsic amino acid side-chain hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity coefficients determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of model peptides: Comparison with other hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity scales. Biopolymers 92: 573–595.
Papo, N., Z. Oren, U. Pag, H.G. Sahl, and Y. Shai. 2002. The consequence of sequence alteration of an amphipathic alpha-helical antimicrobial peptide and its diastereomers. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277: 33913–33921.
Papo, N., M. Shahar, L. Eisenbach, and Y. Shai. 2003. A novel lytic peptide composed of dl-amino acids selectively kills cancer cells in culture and in mice. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278: 21018–21023.
Paredes-Gamero, E.J., M.N. Martins, F.A. Cappabianco, J.S. Ide, and A. Miranda. 2012. Characterization of dual effects induced by antimicrobial peptides: Regulated cell death or membrane disruption. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1820: 1062–1072.
Shadidi, M., and M. Sioud. 2003. Selective targeting of cancer cells using synthetic peptides. Drug Resistance Updates 6: 363–371.
Shai, Y. 1999. Mechanism of the binding, insertion and destabilization of phospholipid bilayer membranes by alpha-helical antimicrobial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1462: 55–70.
Shang, D., F. Yu, J. Li, J. Zheng, L. Zhang, and Y. Li. 2009. Molecular cloning of cDNAs encoding antimicrobial peptide precursors from the skin of the Chinese brown frog, Rana chensinensis. Zoological Science 26: 220–226.
Smith, L.L., K. Brown, P. Carthew, C.K. Lim, E.A. Martin, J. Styles, and I.N. White. 2000. Chemoprevention of breast cancer by tamoxifen: Risks and opportunities. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 30: 571–594.
Stark, M., L.P. Liu, and C.M. Deber. 2002. Cationic hydrophobic peptides with antimicrobial activity. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46: 3585–3590.
Szakács, G., J.K. Paterson, J.A. Ludwig, C. Booth-Genthe, and M.M. Gottesman. 2006. Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer. National Reviews. Drug Discovery. 5: 219–234.
Wang, C., H.B. Li, S. Li, L.L. Tian, and D.J. Shang. 2012. Antitumor effects and cell selectivity of temporin-1CEa, an antimicrobial peptide from the skin secretions of the Chinese brown frog (Rana chensinensis). Biochimie 94: 434–441.
Wieprecht, T., M. Dathe, M. Beyermann, E. Krause, W.L. Maloy, D.L. MacDonald, and M. Bienert. 1997. Peptide hydrophobicity controls the activity and selectivity of magainin 2 amide in interaction with membranes. Biochemistry 36: 6124–6132.
Yeaman, M.R., and N.Y. Yount. 2003. Mechanisms of antimicrobial peptide action and resistance. Pharmacological Reviews 55: 27–55.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81202448 and 31272314), Scientific Research Fund of Liaoning Provincial Education Department (L2012382) and the Program for Liaoning Innovative Research Team in University (LT2012019).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, QZ., Wang, C., Lang, L. et al. Design of potent, non-toxic anticancer peptides based on the structure of the antimicrobial peptide, temporin-1CEa. Arch. Pharm. Res. 36, 1302–1310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-013-0112-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-013-0112-8