Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neural responses to cartoon facial attractiveness: An event-related potential study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neuroscience Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animation creates a vivid, virtual world and expands the scope of human imagination. In this study, we investigated the time-courses of brain responses related to the evaluation of the attractiveness of cartoon faces using the event-related potential (ERP) technique. The results demonstrated that N170 amplitude was higher for attractive than for unattractive cartoon faces in males, while the opposite was found in females. Facial attractiveness notably modulated the late positive component (LPC), which might reflect the task-related process of aesthetic appraisal of beauty. The mean LPC amplitude in males was significantly higher for attractive cartoon faces than for unattractive faces, while the LPC amplitude in females did not significantly differ between attractive and unattractive cartoon faces. Moreover, the paint mode (computer graphics, gouache, and stick figure) modulated the early encoding of facial structures and the late evaluative process. The early modulation effect by paint mode may be related to the spatial frequency of the pictures. The processing speed and intensity in females were both higher than those in males. In conclusion, our study, for the first time, reported ERP modulation based on the assessment of cartoon facial attractiveness, suggesting the facilitated selection of attractiveness information at the early stage, and that the attentional enhancement of attractive faces at the late stage only exists in males. This suggests that men’s brains are hard-wired to be sensitive to facial beauty, even in cartoons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dekowska M, Kuniecki M, Jaskowski P. Facing facts: neuronal mechanisms of face perception. Acta Neurobiol Exp 2008, 68: 229–252.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koscinsk K. Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences. Anthropol Rev 2007, 70: 45–79.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maldonado CC, Bentley AJ, Mitchell D. A pictorial sleepiness scale based on cartoon faces. Sleep 2004, 27: 541–548.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lagattuta KH, Sayfan L, Monsour M. A new measure for assessing executive function across a wide age range: children and adults find happy-sad more difficult than daynight. Dev Sci 2011, 14: 481–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ren PJ. Effects of cartoons on violence liability in Chinese children. J Nanjing Uni (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences) 2002, 148: 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosset DB, Santos A, Da Fonseca D, Poinso F, O’Connor K, Deruelle C. Do children perceive features of real and cartoon faces in the same way? Evidence from typical development and autism. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2010, 32: 212–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang L, Wang JM, Wang JL, Lu YJ. A Comparative eventrelated potential study on recognition of cartoon face and real face. Psychol Rev 2012, 5: 19–28. [Article in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tong F, Nakayama K, Moscovitch M, Weinrib O, Kanwisher N. Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cogn Neuropsychol 2000, 17: 257–280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen H, Russell R, Nakayama K, Livingstone M. Crossing the’ uncanny valley’: adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. Perception 2010, 39: 378–386.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Han SH, Jiang Y, Glyn WH. Watching cartoons activates the medial prefrontal cortex in children. Chinese Sci Bull 2007, 52: 3371–3375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishizu T, Ayabe T, Kojima S. Configurational factors in the perception of faces and non-facial objects: an ERP study. Int J Neurosci 2008, 118: 955–966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jemel B, Schuller AM, Cheref-Khan Y, Goffaux V, Crommelinck M, Bruyer R. Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component. Neuroreport 2003, 14: 2035–2039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston VS, Oliver-Rodriguez JC. Facial beauty and the late positive component of event-related potentials. J Sex Res, 1997, 34: 188–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Langeslag SJ, Jansma BM, Franken IH, Van Strien JW. Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli. Biol Psychol 2007, 76: 109–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng CL, Wang LL, Wang NY, Gu RL, Luo YJ. The time course of implicit processing of erotic pictures: an eventrelated potential study. Brain Res 2012, 1489: 48–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Feng CL, Wang LL, Liu C, Zhu XR, Dai RN, Mai XQ, et al. The time course of the influence of valence and arousal on the implicit processing of affective pictures. PLoS One 2012, 7: e29668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Olofsson JK, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J. Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol 2008, 77: 247–265.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pizzagalli DA, Lehmann D, Hendrick AM, Regard M, Pascual-Marqui RD, Davidson RJ. Affective judgments of faces modulate early activity (approximately 160 ms) within the fusiform gyri. Neuroimage 2002, 16: 663–677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo YF, Zhou S, Yin J, Lv TM, Lu BX, Liu I, et al. Facial beauty processing revealed by spatiotemporal pattern of event-related potentials. J Fourth Military Medical Uni 2007, 28: 1711–1713. [Article in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Werheid K, Schacht A, Sommer W. Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biol Psychol 2007, 76: 100–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peng L. Introduction to Cartoon. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Hooff JC, Crawford H, van Vugt M. The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2011, 6: 477–485.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mason MF, Tatkow EP, Macrae CN. The look of love: gaze shifts and person perception. Psychol Sci 2005, 16: 236–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marzi T, Viggiano MP. When memory meets beauty: Insights from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 2010, 84: 192–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schacht A, Werheid K, Sommer W. The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2008, 8: 132–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bronstad PM, Russell R. Beauty is in the’ we’ of the beholder: greater agreement on facial attractiveness among close relations. Perception 2007, 36: 1674–1681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hofel L, Jacobsen T. Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes? Int J Psychophysiol 2007, 65: 20–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao L. ERPs Experiment Course. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shi L, Wu RJ, Xu CP, Zhang SW, Zhu HW, Liu ZX, et al. Neural mechanism of spatial frequency representation in face categorization: an ECoG study. Prog Biochem Biophys 2010, 37: 786–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Halit H, de Haan M, Schyns PG, Johnson MH. Is highspatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection? Brain Res 2006, 1117: 154–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang JL, Wang JM, Ren JT, Lu YJ. A comparative eventrelated potential study on cartoon face classification and perception processing. J Psychol Sci 2013, 36: 320–327. [Article in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gai Y, Li YJ, Zhu YS, Zhao L. Gender difference in face recognition. J Biomed Eng 2009, 26: 47–49. [Article in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  33. Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S. Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness? Acta Psychol (Amst) 2009, 131: 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Proverbio AM, Brignone V, Matarazzo S, Del Zotto M, Zani A. Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing. BMC Neurosci 2006, 7: 44.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Spicer KR, Platek SM. Curvaceous female bodies activate neural reward centers in men. Commun Integr Biol 2010, 3: 282–283.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Y, Kong FC, Chen H, Jackson T, Han L, Meng J, et al. Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: an event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm. J Neurosci Res 2011, 89: 1887–1893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Winston JS, O’Doherty J, Kilner JM, Perrett DI, Dolan RJ. Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45: 195–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cloutier J, Heatherton TF, Whalen PJ, Kelley WM. Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, 20: 941–951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chatterjee A, Thomas A, Smith SE, Aguirre GK. The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology 2009, 23: 135–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Senior C. Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron 2003, 38: 525–528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Peng XH, Wei JH, Luo YJ, Zhao L, Wang GF. Brain processing component during face cognition—N170 revealed by event-related potentials. Space Med Med Eng (Beijing) 2002, 15: 303–304.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pallett PM, Link S, Lee K. New “golden” ratios for facial beauty. Vision Res 2010, 50: 149–154.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stephen ID, Law Smith MJ, Stirrat MR, Perrett DI. Facial skin coloration affects perceived health of human faces. Int J Primatol 2009, 30: 845–857.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Brown WM, Price ME, Kang J, Pound N, Zhao Y, Yu H. Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105: 12938–12943.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Li O, Chen H. The retrospect and prospect of facial attractiveness. Adv Psychol Sci 2010, 18: 472–479. [Article in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lei X, Xu P, Luo C, Zhao JP, Zhou D, Yao DZ. fMRI functional networks for EEG source imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2011, 32: 1141–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lei X, Ostwald D, Hu JH, Qiu C, Porcaro C, Bagshaw AP, et al. Multimodal functional network connectivity: an EEG-fMRI fusion in network space. PLoS One 2011, 6: e24642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou, 310012, China

    Yingjun Lu, Jingmei Wang, Ling Wang, Junli Wang & Jinliang Qin

Authors
  1. Yingjun Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingmei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ling Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junli Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinliang Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingjun Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, Y., Wang, J., Wang, L. et al. Neural responses to cartoon facial attractiveness: An event-related potential study. Neurosci. Bull. 30, 441–450 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-013-1401-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-013-1401-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation