Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of practice versus information on the visual illusion

练习与有关知识对视错觉的影响

  • Article
  • Published:
Neuroscience Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The Müller-Lyer illusion is a visual illusion in which a horizontal shaft with an inward-pointing chevron (fins-out) affixed to each end is perceived longer than a shaft with outward-pointing chevrons (fins-in). The goal of this study was to compare the effects of experience and knowledge about the Müller-Lyer illusion on participants’ perceptual precision.

Method

Participants were undergraduate students (n = 108) who were not familiar with the Müller-Lyer illusion prior to the experiment. The task of participants was to adjust one movable line to make it equal to the other in Müller-Lyer figure. They received ascending and descending Müller-Lyer trials in three blocks with 20 trials each. The Experimental Group received information about the Müller-Lyer illusion prior to the third block.

Results

For the Experimental Group, the amount of departure in Block 3 was reduced significantly compared with previous blocks.

Conclusion

Knowledge about the mechanisms underlying visual illusions may play an important role in helping individuals overcome them.

摘要

目的

缪勒一莱尔错觉(Müller-Lyer illusion)是一种视错觉, 即一条水平线段两端加上向外的箭头(fins-out), 那么它看起来要比带有向内箭头(fins-in)的线段长些。 本研究的目的是比较练习和有关知识对缪勒一莱尔错觉受试者感知精确度的不同影响。

方法

受试者为 事先对缪勒一莱尔错觉不了解的大学生(共108人, 其中对 照组20 人), 他们被要求在缪勒一莱尔模型中调整一条可移动线段的长度, 使其与另一条线段的长度相同。 受试者要接受缪勒一莱尔递增测试和递减测试。 测试共分三个阶段, 每阶段20 次(10 次递增测试, 10 次递减测试)。 在第三阶段测试开始前, 实验组学习了缪勒一莱尔错觉的有关知识。

结果

在实验组中, 第三阶段测试的偏差明显小于前两阶段。

结论

了解视错觉机制的有关知识对于帮助人们纠正视错觉很重要。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rock I. An Introduction to Perception. New York: MacMilan, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andreas BG. Experimental Psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein BE. Sensation and Perception. Belmont: Wadsworth, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hochberg JE. Perception. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gregory RL. Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McGraw KO, Stanford J. The apparent distance of interior and exterior corners: a test of Gregory’s misapplied size constancy explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion. J Gen Psychol 1994, 121: 19–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 1992, 15: 20–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Predebon J. Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information. Exp Brain Res 2005, 163: 100–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lavrysen A, Helsen WF, Elliott D, Buekers MJ, Feys P, Heremans E. The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion. Exp Brain Res 2006, 174: 544–554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Solso RL. Cognitive Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crafts LW. Recent Experiment in Psychology. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schiano DJ, Jordan K. Müller-Lyer decrement: practice or prolonged inspection? Perception 1990, 19: 307–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fraisse P. Manuel pratique de psychologie expérimentale. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brosvic GM, Dihoff RE, Fama J. Age-related susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer and the horizontal-vertical illusions. Percept Mot Skills 2002, 94: 229–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javad S. Fadardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khorasani, A.A., Fadardi, J.S., Fadardi, M.S. et al. Effect of practice versus information on the visual illusion. Neurosci. Bull. 23, 30–34 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-007-0004-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-007-0004-3

Keywords

CLC number

关键词

Navigation