Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prompt Repair of Post Cholecystectomy Bile Duct Transection Recognized Intraoperatively and Referred Early: Experience from a Tertiary Care Teaching Unit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postcholecystectomy bile duct injuries are a cause of significant morbidity and occasional mortality. Intraoperative recognition and repair of complete biliary transection with hepaticojejunostomy is the recommended treatment; however, it is possible only in few patients as either the injury is not recognized intraoperatively or the center is not geared up to perform an urgent hepaticojejunostomy in these patients with a nondilated duct. Retrospective analysis of data from a tertiary care referral center over a period of 10 years from January 2000 to December 2009 to report the feasibility and outcomes of prompt repair was done (defined as repair within 72 h of index operation) of postcholecystectomy bile duct injury. Ten patients of postcholecystectomy bile duct injury detected intraoperatively and referred early underwent prompt repair. All patients had a complete transection of the bile duct (type of injuries as per Strasberg classification: Type E V: 1, Type E III: 5, Type E II: 3 and Type E I: 1). The mean duration between injury and bile duct repair in the form of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) was 22.7 (range 5–42) hours. The mean diameter of the anastomosis was 1.63 (range1–2.1) cm, and the anastomosis was stented in 7 patients. The mean duration of surgery was 4.6 +1.7 h. One patient developed bile leak on the first postoperative day, which settled by day 5. The mean duration of hospital stay was 5.1 (range 4–8) days. With a mean follow-up of 42 (range 24–110) months, all patients had excellent (70 %) or good outcome (30 %). Prompt RYHJ (within first 72 h) for postcholecystectomy biliary transection is an effective treatment and potentially limits the morbidity to the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen D (1997) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11(2):133–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll BJ, Birth M, Phillips EH (1998) Common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that result in litigation. Surg Endosc 12(4):310–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jarnagin WR, Blumgart LH (1999) Operative repair of bile duct injuries involving the hepatic duct confluence. Arch Surg 134:769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mercado MA (2006) Early versus late repair of bile duct injuries. Surg Endosc 20:1644–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald MI, Farnell MB, Nagorney D et al (1995) Benign biliary strictures: repair and outcome with a contemporary approach. Surgery 118:582–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Calvete J, Sabater L, Camps B et al (2000) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: myth or reality of the learning curve? Surg Endosc 14:608–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C et al (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290:2168–2173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergman JJ, van den Brink GR, Rauws EA et al (1996) Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut 38(1):141–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Walsh RM, Henderson JM, Vogt DP, Brown N (2007) Long-term outcome of biliary reconstructionfor bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery 142(4):456–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goykhman Y, Kory I, Small R et al (2008) Long-term outcome and risk factors of failure after bile duct injury repair. J Gastrointest Surg 12(8):1412–1417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahajpal AK, Chow SC, Dixon E (2010) Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Timing of repair and long-term outcomes. Arch Surg 145(8):757–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mercado MA, Chan C, Orozco H, Tielve M, Hinojosa CA (2003) Acute bile duct injury. The need for a high repair. Surg Endosc 17(9):1351–1355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lau WY, Lai ECH, Lau SHY (2010) Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review. ANZ J Surg 80:75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta N, Solomon H, Fairchild R, Kaminski DL (1998) Management and outcome of patients with combined bile duct and hepatic artery injuries. Arch Surg 133:176–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chapman WC, Havely A, Blumgart LH, Benjamin IS (1995) Postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures: management and outcome in 130 patients. Arch Surg 130:597–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sikora SS, Pottakkat B, Srikanth G, Kumar A, Saxena R, Kapoor VK (2006) Postcholecystectomy benign biliary strictures—long-term results. Dig Surg 23(5–6):304–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murr MM, Gigot JF, Nagorney DM, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM, Farnell MB (1999) Long term results of biliary reconstruction after laparoscopic bile duct injuries. Arch Surg 134(6):604–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil K. Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arora, A., Nag, H.H., Yadav, A. et al. Prompt Repair of Post Cholecystectomy Bile Duct Transection Recognized Intraoperatively and Referred Early: Experience from a Tertiary Care Teaching Unit. Indian J Surg 77, 99–103 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0727-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0727-x

Keywords

Navigation