Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Routine Sub-hepatic Drainage versus No Drainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Open, Randomized, Clinical Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgeons are still following the old habit of routine subhepatic drainage following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study aims to compare the outcome of subhepatic drainage with no drainage after LC. This prospective study was conducted in two phases. Phase I was open, randomized controlled trial (RCT), conducted in Civil Hospital Karachi, from August 2004 to June 2005. Phase II was descriptive case series, conducted in author’s practice hospitals of Karachi, from July 2005 to December 2009. In phase I, 170 patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis underwent LC. Patients were divided into two groups, subhepatic drainage (group A: 79 patients) or no drainage (group B: 76 patients). The rest 15 patients were excluded either due to conversion or elective subhepatic drainage. In phase II, 218 consecutive patients were enrolled, who underwent LC with no subhepatic drainage. Duration of operation, character, and amount of drain fluid (if placed), postoperative ultrasound for subhepatic collection, postoperative chest X-ray for the measurement of subdiaphragmatic air, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea/vomiting, duration of hospital stay, and preoperative or postoperative complications were noted and analyzed. Duration of operation and hospital stay was slightly longer in group A patients (P values 0.002 and 0.029, respectively); postoperative pain perception, nausea/vomiting, and postoperative complications were nearly same in both groups (P value 0.064, 0.078, and 0.003, respectively). Subhepatic fluid collection was more in group A (P = 0.002), whereas subdiaphragmatic air collection was more in group B (P = 0.003). Phase II results were nearly similar to group B patients in phase I. Routine subhepatic drainage after LC is not necessary in uncomplicated cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mellor SG, Thomas MH, Donnellan BS (1988) Cholecystectomy: safe or not safe to drain? J R Soc Med 81:566–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fraser I, Everson NW, Nash JR (1982) A randomised prospective trial of two drainage methods after cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 64:183–185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Diez JA, Pujato MR, Ferreres AR (1990) The need of drainage after cholecystectomy. HPB Surg 3:5–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormack TT, Abel PD, Collins CD (1983) Abdominal drainage following cholecystectomy: high, low, or no suction? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 65:326–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nursal TZ, Yildirim S, Tarim A, Noyan T, Poyraz P, Tuna N, Haberal M (2003) Effect of drainage on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:95–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis RT, Goodall RG, Marien B, Park M, Lloyd-Smith W, Wiegand FM (1990) Simple elective cholecystectomy: to drain or not. Am J Surg 159(2):241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chilton CP, Mann CV (1980) Drainage after cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 62:60–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Salam IM, Mcmullin JP, O'higgins NJ (1984) A comparison of two types of vacuum drainage after cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 66:190–191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien PA (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawasli A, Brown E (1994) The effect of drains in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 4(6):393–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jorgensen JO, Gillies RB, Hunt DR, Caplehorn JR, Lumley T (1995) A simple and effective way to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 65(7):466–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abbott J, Hawe J, Srivatsava P, Hunter D, Garry R (2001) Intraperitoneal gas drain to reduce pain after laparoscopy: randomized masked trial. Obstet Gynecol 98(1):97–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alexander JI, Hull MG (1987) Abdominal pain after laparoscopy: the value of a gas drain. British J Obstet Gynaecol 94(3):267–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fredman B, Jedeikin R, Olsfanger D, Flor P, Gruzman A (1994) Residual pneumoperitoneum: a cause of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 79(1):152–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thiebe U, Eggert A (1994) Drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minimal Invasive Chirurgie 3:90–92

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Mullerat P, Davidson BR (2009) Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Review). Cochrane review, published in The Cochrane Library by JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd, vol. 1, pp 1–11

  17. Elboim CM, Goldman L, Hann L, Palestrant AM, Silen TW (1983) Significance of post-cholecystectomy subhepatic fluid collections. Ann Surg 198(2):137–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Capitanich P, Segundo UL, Malizia P, Herrera J, Iovaldi ML (2005) Usefulness of prophylactic drainage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Randomized prospective report. Prensa Medica Argentina 92(9):623–627

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mrozowicz A, Rucinski P, Polkowski WP (2006) Routine drainage of the subhepatic area after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Prospective, controlled study with random patient selection. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny 78(5):597–609

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tzovaras G, Liakou P, Fafoulakis F, Baloyiannis I, Zacharoulis D, Hatzitheofilou C (2009) Is there a role for drain use in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A controlled randomized trial. Am J Surgery 197:759–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nomdedeu J, Escrig J, Salvador JL (1996) Systematic placement of drains in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective study. Revista de la Sociedad Valenciana de Patologia Digestiva 15(4):299–300

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Lundell L (2006) Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Brit J Surgery 93(1):40–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsimoyiannis EC, Siakas P, Tassis A, Lekkas ET, Tzourou H, Kambili M (1998) Intraperitoneal normal saline infusion for postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 22:824–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Fatima Hospital & Baqai Medical University, Karachi, 74600, Pakistan

    Muhammad Shamim

  2. Civil Hospital Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan

    Muhammad Shamim

Authors
  1. Muhammad Shamim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Shamim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shamim, M. Routine Sub-hepatic Drainage versus No Drainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Open, Randomized, Clinical Trial. Indian J Surg 75, 22–27 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0452-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0452-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation