Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

6 Year Prospective Clinical Trial of Primary Repair Versus Diversion Colostomy in Colonic Injury Cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management pathway of colonic injury has been evolving over last three decades. There has been general agreement that surgical methods dealing with colonic injury did not affect the outcome but there are certain independent risk factors for complications. These risk factors are still not clear and studies are going on to specify these risk factors. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate that primary closure of colonic injury without colostomy in selective patient is safe. This was a prospective study of 6 year duration. All the colonic injuries operated and divided into two groups: primary repair and colostomy. The criteria for exclusion of primary repair taken were; injury time >8 hour, patient need >4 unit of blood transfusion till surgery, devascularization injury of colon, any pre existing disease of bowel, any severe co morbid disease like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, tuberculosis, malignancy etc. Both groups are analyzed by assessing complications with special emphasis on leak rate. Patients died within 72 hours of admission were excluded from study. Total 55 colonic injury cases operated and primary repair was done in 35 cases and colostomy in 20 cases. There was 1 mortality in colostomy group and no major morbidity in both groups. The complications in primary repair group were; 1 leak (treated conservatively), 5 wound infections 1 incisional hernia and 1 intra abdominal abscess. In colostomy group 8 cases of wound infections, 2 incisional hernias and 2 intra abdominal abscesses occurred. Primary repair of colon injuries can be safely done in selected patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stone HH, Fabian TC (1979) Management of perforating colon trauma: randomization between primary closure and exteriorization. Ann Surg 190:430–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornwell EE 3rd, Velmahos GC, Berne TV et al (1998) The fate of colonic suture lines in high-risk trauma patients: a prospective analysis. J Am Coll Surg 187:58–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ivatuary RR, Gaudino J et al (1993) Definitive treatment of colon injuries: a prospective study. Am Surg 59(1):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murray JA, Demetriades D et al (1999) Colonic resection in trauma: colostomy versus anastomosis. J Trauma 46(2):250–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. George SM Jr, Fabian TC et al (1989) Primary repair of colon wounds. Ann surg 209(6):728–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson LE, Gomez GA, Broadie TA (1997) Primary repair of 58 consecutive penetrating injuries of the colon: should colostomy be abandoned? Am surg 63(2):170–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chappuis CW, Frey DJ et al (1991) Management of penetrating colon injuries. A prospective randomized trial. Ann surg 213(5):492–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasaki LS, Alleben RD, Golwala R, Mittal VK (1995) Primary repair of colon injuries: A prospective randomized study. J trauma 39(5):895–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Adesanya AA, Ekanem EE (2004) A ten year study of penetrating injuries of the colon. Dis colon Rectum 47(12):2169–2177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Curran TJ, Borzotta AP (1999) Complications of primary repair of colon injury; literature review of 2964 cases. Am J Surg 177(1):42–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Conard JK, Ferry KM et al (2000) Changing management trends in penetrating colon trauma. Dis colon Rectum 43(4):466–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Breitenstein S, Kraus A et al (2007) Emergency Left colon resection for acute perforation. Primary anastomosis or Hartman’s procedure? A case matched control study. World J Surg 31(11):2117–2124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Demetriades D, Murry JA et al (2001) Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection; diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study. J Trauma 50(5):765–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller PR, Fabian TC et al (2002) Improving outcomes following penetrating colon wounds: application of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 235(6):775–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nelson RL, Singer M (2003) Primary repair for penetrating colon injuries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review 2003, issue 3 Doi: 10.1002/14651858, CD 002247

  16. Falcon RE, Wanamaker SR et al (1992) Colorectal trauma: primary repair or anastomoses with intracolonic bypass vs ostomy. Dis colon Rectum 35(10):957–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzalez RP, Falimirski ME, Holevar MR (2000) Further evaluation of colostomy in penetrating colon injury. Am Surg 66(4):342–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamwendo NY, Modivda MC, Matlala NS, Beeker PJ (2002) Randomized clinical trial to determine if delay from time of penetrating colonic injury precludes primary repair. Br J Surg 89(8):993–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osman Musa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Musa, O., Ghildiyal, J.P. & C Pandey, M. 6 Year Prospective Clinical Trial of Primary Repair Versus Diversion Colostomy in Colonic Injury Cases. Indian J Surg 72, 308–311 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0191-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0191-4

Keywords

Navigation