Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic CBD Exploration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a cost effective, efficient and minimally invasive method of treating choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic Surgery for common bile duct stones (CBDS) was first described in 1991, Petelin (Surg Endosc 17:1705–1715, 2003). The surgical technique has evolved since then and several studies have concluded that Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LCBDE) procedures are superior to sequential endolaparoscopic treatment in terms of both clinical and economical outcomes, Cuschieri et al. (Surg Endosc 13:952–957, 1999), Rhodes et al. (Lancet 351:159–161, 1998). We started doing LCBDE in 1998.Our experience with LCBDE from 1998 to 2004 has been published, Gupta and Bhartia (Indian J Surg 67:94–99, 2005). Here we present our series from January 2005 to March 2009. In a retrospective study from January 2005 to March 2009, we performed 3060 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, out of which 342 patients underwent intraoperative cholangiogram and 158 patients eventually had CBD exploration. 6 patients were converted to open due to presence of multiple stones and 2 patients were converted because of difficulty in defining Calots triangle; 42 patients underwent transcystic clearance, 106 patients had choledochotomy, 20 patients had primary closure of CBD whereas in 86 patients CBD was closed over T-tube; 2 patients had incomplete stone clearance and underwent postoperative ERCP. Choledochoduodenosotomy was done in 2 patients. Patients were followed regularly at six monthly intervals with a range of six months to three years of follow-up. There were no major complications like bile leak or pancreatitis. 8 patients had port—site minor infection which settled with conservative treatment. There were no cases of retained stones or intraabdominal infection. The mean length of hospital stay was 3 days (range 2–8 days). LCBDE remains an efficient, safe, cost-effective method of treating CBDS. Primary closure of choledochotomy in select patients is a viable & safe option with shorter operative time and length of stay. LCBDE can be performed successfully with minimal morbidity & mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petelin J (2003) Laparoscopic approach to common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17:1705–1715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuschieri A, Lezoche C, Morino M, Croce E et al (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rhodes M, Susmon L, Cohen L, Lewis MP (1998) Randomized trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351:159–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta P, Bhartia VK (2005) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: our experience. Indian J Surg 67:94–99

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shojaiefard A, Esmaeilzadeh M, Ghafouri A, Mehrabi A (2009) Various techniques for the surgical treatment of common bile duct stones: a meta review. Gasteroenterol Res Pract :1–12

  6. Tai CK, Tang CN, Ha JPY, Chau CH, Siu WT, Li MKW (2004) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 18(6):910–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Assalia A, Gagner M, Schein M (2006) Controversies in surgery. pp 261–272

  8. Nathanson L, O’Rourke N, Martin I et al (2005) Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:188–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson MH, Tranter SE (2002) All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89(12):1608–1612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guruswamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD005641

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meman MA, Meman MI (2000) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: the past, the present and the future. Am J Surg 179:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lezoche E, Pagani A, Carlei F, Felicioth F, Lomanto D, Guerrie M (1996) Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a prospective study. World J Surg 20:535–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Isla AM, Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Arbuckle JD (2004) Advantages of laparoscopic stented choledochography over T-tube placement. Br J Surg 91:862–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei Q, Hu HJ, Cai XY et al (2004) Biliary drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 10:3175–3178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Savita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savita, K.S., Bhartia, V.K. Laparoscopic CBD Exploration. Indian J Surg 72, 395–399 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0157-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0157-6

Keywords

Navigation