Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Palliative care: patient’s autonomy in the end-of-life situation

  • case report
  • Published:
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Palliative care has evolved over the past five decades as an interprofessional specialty to improve quality of life and quality of care for patients with cancer and their families. The main objective in an end-of-life (EOL) situation is to maintain the autonomy and the dignity of the patient as much as possible. Due to the severity of progressive diseases and as a result of the poor general condition of the patient, their autonomy is often endangered. This case report presents a 70-year-old woman who suffered from hepatic and bone metastases from cancer of unknown primary (CUP) in a palliative setting and discusses the supportive treatment opportunities as well as the ethical thoughts about her autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. World Health Organization. National cancer control programmes: policies and managerial guidelines. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hui D, Bruera E. Models of palliative care delivery for patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(9):852–65. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.02123. PMID: 32023157; PMCID: PMC7082156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Swami M, Case AA. Effective palliative care: what is involved? Oncology. 2018;32(4):180–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rangachari D, Smith TJ. Integrating palliative care in oncology: the oncologist as a primary palliative care provider. Cancer J. 2013;19:373–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodríguez-Prat A, Monforte-Royo C, Porta-Sales J, Escribano X, Balaguer A. Patient perspectives of dignity, autonomy and control at the end of life: systematic review and meta-ethnography. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e151435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151435. PMID: 27010323; PMCID: PMC4806874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Childress JF. The place of autonomy in bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 1990;20(1):12–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dworkin G. The theory and practice of autonomy. : Cambridge University Press; 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider CE. The practice of autonomy: patients, doctors, and medical decisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gómez-Vírseda C, de Maeseneer Y, Gastmans C. Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00495-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanai Y, Ishiki H, Maeda I, Iwase S. A survey of practice in management of malignancy-related ascites in Japan. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e220869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerbes AL, Labenz J, et al. Aktualisierung der S2k-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) „Komplikationen der Leberzirrhose“ . AWMF-Nr.: 021-017 Version November 2018. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/021-017l_S2k_Komplikationen-der-Leberzirrhose_2019-04.pdf. Accessed 20.10.2021.

  12. Sharma S, Walsh D. Management of symptomatic malignant ascites with diuretics: two case reports and a review of the literature. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1995;10(3):237–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-3924(94)00129-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramazzotti D, Clardy P, Celi LA, Stone DJ, Rudin RS. Withholding or withdrawing invasive interventions may not accelerate time to death among dying ICU patients. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e212439. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Houska A, Loučka M. Patients’ autonomy at the end of life: a critical review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2019;57(4):835–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bakitas MA. Self-determination: analysis of the concept and implications for research in palliative care. Can J Nurs Res. 2005;37(2):22–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. SPIKES—A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302–11. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267(16):2221–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reach G. Patient autonomy in chronic care: solving a paradox. Patient Prefer Adher. 2014;8:15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roeland E, Cain J, Onderdonk C, Kerr K, Mitchell W, Thornberry K. When open-ended questions don’t work: the role of palliative paternalism in difficult medical decisions. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(4):415–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2013.0408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Palliative Care Unit, Franziskus Spital, Vienna, Austria, Landstraßer Hauptstraße 4a, 1030

    Bert Engelhardt MD

Authors
  1. Bert Engelhardt MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert Engelhardt MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

B. Engelhardt declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Engelhardt, B. Palliative care: patient’s autonomy in the end-of-life situation. memo 15, 76–78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-021-00783-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-021-00783-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation