Skip to main content
Log in

Design of emergency braking algorithm for pedestrian protection based on multi-sensor fusion

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Globally, safety has become an increasingly important issue in the automotive industry. In an attempt to reduce traffic fatalities, UNECE launched a new EU Road Safety Program which aims to decrease the number of road deaths by half by 2020. AEB (Autonomous Emergency Braking) is a very effective active safety system intended to reduce fatalities. This study involves the design of a multi-sensor data fusion strategy and decision-making algorithm for AEB pedestrian. Possible collision avoidance scenarios according to the EuroNCAP protocol are analyzed and a robust pedestrian tracking strategy is proposed. The performance of the AEB system is enhanced by using a braking model to predict the collision avoidance time and by designing the system activation zone according to the relative speed and possible distance required to stop for pedestrians. The AEB activation threshold requires careful consideration. The test results confirm the advantages of the proposed algorithm, the performance of which is described in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chavez-Garcia, R. O., Burlet, J., Vu, T. D. and Aycard, O. (2012). Frontal object perception using radar and monovision. IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symp., 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H. G., Seo, Y. W., Kumar, B. V. K. V. and Rajakumar, R. (2014). A multi-sensor fusion system for moving object detection and tracking in urban driving environments. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE Int. Conf., 1836–1843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, A., Hohm, A. and Lueke, S. (2013). An integrated ADAS solution for pedestrian collision avoidance. Int. Technical Conf. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV).

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroNCAP (2014). Euro NCAP 2020 Roadmap.

  • Gandhi, T. and Trivedi, M. M. (2007). Pedestrian protection systems: Issues, survey, and challenges. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 8, 3, 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdane, H., Serre, T., Masson, C. and Anderson, R. (2015). Issues and challenges for pedestrian active safety systems based on real world accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 82, 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IRTAD (2016). International Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group. Road Safety Annual Report 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C. G., Dang, T., Fritz, H., Joos, A., Rabe, C. and Gavrila, D. M. (2011). Active pedestrian safety by automatic braking and evasive steering. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 12, 4, 1292–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KoROAD (2015). Road Traffic Safety Authority Korea. Traffic Accident Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. H., Kim, S. K. and Huh, K. S. (2014). Development of an autonomous braking system using the predicted stopping distance. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 2, 341–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugier, C., Paromtchik, I. E., Perrollaz, M., Yong, M., Yoder, J., Tay, C., Mekhnacha, K. and Negre, A. (2011). Probabilistic analysis of dynamic scenes and collision risks assessment to improve driving safety. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 3, 4, 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S., Moon, I. and Yi, K. (2009). Design, tuning and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidance. Control Engineering Practice 17, 4, 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikawa, S., Matsui, Y. and Sakurai, T. (2014). Characteristics of collision damage mitigation braking system for pedestrian protection. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 7, 1129–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiniger, P., Bartels, O., Pastor, C. and Wisch, M. (2013). An open simulation approach to identify chances and limitations for vulnerable road user (VRU) active safety. Traffic Injury Prevention 14, Supplement 1, s2–s12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiniger, P., Bartels, O., Kunert, M. and Schaller, T. (2014). Assessment Methodologies for Forward Looking Integrated Pedestrian and Further Extension to Cyclist Safety. IDIADA, ASPECSS D2.5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Themann, P., Kotte, J., Raudszus, D. and Eckstein, L. (2015). Impact of positioning uncertainty of vulnerable road users on risk minimization in collision avoidance systems. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. IV), 1201–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiemann, N., Branz, W. and Schramm, D. (2009). Predictive pedestrian protection-sensor requirements and risk assessment. Proc. Int. Technical Conf. Enhanced Safety Vehicles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, L. (1999). Some terms of reference in data fusion. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 37, 3, 1190–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhofen, D., Grundler, C., Doll, K., Brunsmann, U. and Zecha, S. (2012). Transponder and camera-based advanced driver assistance system. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. IV), 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiest, J., Hö ffken, M., Kreßel, U. and Dietmayer, K. (2012). Probabilistic trajectory prediction with Gaussian mixture models. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. IV), 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2013). Pedestrian Safety: A Road Safety Manual for Decision-makers and Practitioners.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Soo Kwon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, HK., Shin, SG. & Kwon, DS. Design of emergency braking algorithm for pedestrian protection based on multi-sensor fusion. Int.J Automot. Technol. 18, 1067–1076 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0104-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0104-7

Key words

Navigation