Abstract
This paper presents the rational for the selection of fluids for use in a model based study of sub and supercritical Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). The study focuses on multiple vehicle heat sources and the potential of WHR ORC’s for its conversion into useful work. The work presented on fluid selection is generally applicable to any waste heat recovery system, either stationary or mobile and, with careful consideration, is also applicable to single heat sources. The fluid selection process presented reduces the number of potential fluids from over one hundred to a group of under twenty fluids for further refinement in a model based WHR ORC performance study. The selection process uses engineering judgement, legislation and, where applicable, health and safety as fluid selection or de-selection criteria. This paper also investigates and discusses the properties of specific ORC fluids with regard to their impact on the theoretical potential for delivering efficient WHR ORC work output. The paper concludes by looking at potential temperature and pressure WHR ORC limits with regard to fluid properties thereby assisting with the generation of WHR ORC simulation boundary conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Bar:
-
pressure in bar (absolute)
- CFC:
-
chlorofluorocarbon
- Expansion ratio:
-
ratio of fluid density at the inlet to the exit of the expander
- GWP:
-
global warming potential
- Heat Ratio:
-
available exhaust heat /available coolant heat
- HCFC:
-
hydrochlorofluorocarbon
- HFO:
-
hydrofluoroolefin
- IC:
-
internal combustion
- NIST:
-
national Institute of standards
- ODP:
-
ozone depletion potential
- ORC:
-
organic rankine cycle
- ORC cycle eff.:
-
net work out / heat in. Where “heat in” is actual “paid for” heat into the ORC unless otherwise stipulated in the text.
- PFC:
-
perfluorocarbon
- Subcritical:
-
cycle operating at pressures below the fluid’s critical pressure
- Supercritical:
-
cycle operating at pressures above the fluid’s critical pressure
- WHR:
-
waste heat recovery
References
ACEA (2013). European Automobile Manufacturers Association. http://www.acea.be [Accessed 10 May 2013].
Air Squared (2011). Design and manufacture of scroll compressors, pumps, and expanders http://airsquared.com. [Accessed June 2011].
Arias, D. A., Shedd, T. A. and Jester, R. K. (2006). Theoretical analysis of waste heat recovery from an internal combustion engine in a hybrid vehicle. SAE 2006 World Congress and Exhibition. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-1605.
Bao, J. and Zhao, L. (2013). A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle. J. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 325–342.
Çengel, Y. A. and Turner, R. H. (2005). Fundamentals of Thermal-Fluid Sciences. 2nd edn. McGraw Hill. New Jersey.
Chammas, R. E. and Clodic, D. (2005). Combined cycle for hybrid vehicles. SAE 2005 World Congress and Exhibition. SAE Paper No. 2005-01-1171.
Chen, H., Goswami, D. Y. and Stefanakos, E. K. (2010). A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat. J. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 3059–3067.
Crane, D., Jackson, G. and Holloway, D. (2001). Towards optimisation of automotive waste heat recovery using thermoelectrics. SAE 2001 World Congress. SAE Paper No. 2001-01-1021.
Echogen Power Systems (2013). http://www.echogen.com. [Accessed 17 May 2013].
Endo, T., Kawajiri, S., Kojima, Y. and Takahashi, K. (2007). Study on maximizing exergy in automotive engines. SAE World Congress and Exhibition. SAE Paper No. 2007-01-0257.
Europa-EU (2009). Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://europa.eu. [Accessed 17 June 2012].
Europa-EU (2011). Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://europa.eu. [Accessed 18 May 2013].
European Commission (2013). EC Commission Climate Action Policies for Road Transport. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles. [Accessed 17 June 2013].
European Commission (2012). EC Flourinated green house gas policies. http://www.ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/fgas. [Accessed 20 October 2012].
European Commission (2013). EU ODP and GWP legislation administered by the European Environment Agency and EU Clean Air Directives. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/. [Accessed 20 June 2013].
Glover, L. (2012). Automotive Catalyst Modelling: A Commercial Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) Implementation. Queen’s University Belfast, Eng. D. Dissertation. Belfast. UK.
Glover, S., Douglas, R., Glover, L. and McCullough, G. (2014). Preliminary analysis of organic Rankine cycles (ORC) to improve vehicle efficiency. Proc. IMechE, J. Automobile Engineering, Part D. 228, 10, 1142–1153.
Honeywell (2012). Honeywell F Gas Regulation Position paper. The EU Regulation on Certain Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases (F-Gas Regulation 842/2006). http://www.1234facts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06, [Accessed 20 May 2013].
Infinity Turbine LLC (2013). http://www.infinityturbine.com. [Accessed 18 May 2013].
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2013). CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, Highlights. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/CO2EmissionsFromFuelCombustionHighlights2013.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2013].
Kadota, M. and Yamamoto, K. (2008). Advanced transient simulation on hybrid vehicle using Rankine cycle system. SAE World Congress and Exhibition. SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0310.
Kyoto Protocol (2013). http://www.kyotoprotocol.com. [Accessed 9 May 2013].
McKenna, S., McCullough, G. and Douglas, R. (2013). Mathematical modelling of a reciprocating piston expander. Vehicle Thermal Management Systems, IMechE, Conference 11. Coventry TechnoCentre, UK.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2010). NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database (REFPROP): Version 9. http://www.nist.gov. [Accessed November 2010].
Nelson, C. R. (2006). In-vehicle exhaust energy recovery for thermal efficiency improvement, Cummins Inc. Directions in Engine-Efficiency and Emissions Research (DEER) Conference Presentations. Detroit, Michigan, 20–24 August 2006, Waste Heat Recovery Session. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/resources/proceedings/2006_deer_presentations.html#session6 [Accessed 6 June 2013].
Obieglo, A., Ringler, J., Seifert, M. and Hall, W. (2009). Future efficient dynamics with heat recovery, BMW group research and technology. Directions in Engine-Efficiency and Emissions Research (DEER) Conference Presentations. Dearborn, Michigan, 3-6 August 2009, High Efficiency Engine Technologies Session. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/resources/proceedings/2009_deer_presentations.html. [Accessed 10 June 2013].
Rayegan, R. and Tao, Y. X. (2011). Procedure to select working fluids for solar organic Rankine cycles (ORCs). J. Renewable Energy, 36, 659–670.
Sprouse, C. and Depcik, C. (2013). Review of organic Rankine cycles for internal combustion engine exhaust waste heat recovery. J. Applied Thermal Engineering, 51, 711–722.
Teng, H., Regner, G. and Cowl, C. (2006). Achieving high engine efficiency for heavy duty diesel engines by waste heat recovery using supercritical organic fluid Rankine cycle. SAE 2006 Commercial Vehicle Congress and Exhibition. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-3522.
US EPA (2013). Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. http://www.epa.gov/ozone/intpol. [Accessed 8 May 2013].
US EPA (2013). Ozone Layer Protection — Science. Ozonedepleting Substances. Table of many ozone-depleting substances with their ODPs and GWPs numbers, http://www.epa.gov/ozone/science/ods, [Accessed 20 June 2013].
US EPA (2013). US ODP and GWP legislation administered by the Environmental Protection Agency in the Clean Air Act, http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/ [Accessed 20 June 2013].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glover, S., Douglas, R., Glover, L. et al. Automotive waste heat recovery: Working fluid selection and related boundary conditions. Int.J Automot. Technol. 16, 399–409 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-015-0041-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-015-0041-2