Skip to main content
Log in

Shape optimization of lower control arm considering multi-disciplinary constraint condition by using progress meta-model method

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents shape optimization of lower control arm considering multi-disciplinary (stiffness, strength and durability) constraint conditions. As non-linearity of strength and durability is large out of the design constraint conditions and performance indexes are defined as min-max values, sensitivity is not reflected and instead, a sequential approximate optimization (SAO) method using a meta-model is suggested. In order to verify the efficiency of the suggested design method, shape optimization design of a 1 piece-typed lower control arm for compact cars is conducted. The design target aims to meet the multi-disciplinary (stiffness, strength and durability) design constraint conditions and at the same time, intends to minimize the weight. Design variables are 3 shape vectors and 1 thickness while design constraint conditions include 2 stiffness, 12 strength and 26 durability variables, featuring a big design problem. As a result, the design problem is solved in total 3 interation and the optimal model meets all of the design constraint conditions and reduces the weight by about 200 grams comparing with that of the initial model. Thus, the suggested design method is an appropriate method suitable for shape optimization design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Choi, B. LH., Choi, J. H. and Choi, D. H. (2004). Reliabilitybased design optimization of automotive suspension systems for enhanced kinematics and compliance characteristics. Int. J. Automotive Engineering 6,3, 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, H. H., Kwon, S. J. and Tak, T. (2007). Reliabilitybased design optimization of automotive suspension systems. Int. J. Automotive Engineering 8,6, 713–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, A. and Eric, B. (1997). Shape optimization by the homogenization method. Numerische Mathematik, 76, 27–68.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hannes, F. and Richard, S. (2011). Lightweight MacPherson strut suspension front lower control arm design development. SAE Paper No. 2011-01-0562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M. F., Barton, R. R. and Joshi, S. B. (2002). Meta modeling: Radial basis function versus polynominals. European J. Operational Research, 138, 142–154.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, R., Chen, W. and Simpson, T. W. (2001). Comparative studies of meta modeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 23, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, B. J., Sin, H. C. and Kim, J. H. (2007). Optimal shape design of the front wheel lower control arm considering dynamic effects. Int. J. Automotive Technology 8,3, 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. (2008). User’s Guide for AutoDesign, RecurDyn V7R2. FunctionBay Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. (2009a). Integrated Numerical Optimization Library: E-INOPL. Institute of Design Optimization Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. (2009b). Integrated Numerical Optimization Library: B-INOPL. Institute of Design Optimization Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. and Choi, D. H. (2001). Direct treatment of a max-value cost fuction in parametric optimization. Int. J. Numerical Method in Engineering, 50, 169–180.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. and Heo, S. J. (2003). Conservative quadratic RSM combined with incomplete small composite design and conservative least squares fitting. KSME Int. J. 17,5, 698–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S., Cho, H. J., Lee, S. G., Choi, J. H. and Bae, D. S. (2007). DFSS and robust design optimization tool for multibody system with random variables. J. System Design and Dynamics 1,3, 583–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S., Kim, C. W., Kim, J. H. and Choi, J. H. (2008). Efficient optimization method for noisy responses of mechanical systems. J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 222, C, 2433–2439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. H., Park, Y. C. and Huh, S. C. (2003). Multiobjective optimization of lower control arm considering the stability for weight reduction. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 11,4, 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masatoshi, S. and Jiro, T. (2007). Shape optimization for weight reduction of automotive shell structures subject to a strength constraint. SAE Paper No. 2007-01-3720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murali, M. R. and Scott, V. A. (2000). Shape optimization application in upper control arm design. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-3445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. S., Kim, J. K. and Seo, S. M. (2009). Structural design of a front lower control arm considering durability. J. Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers 8,4, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, P. S. and Chang, K. H. (2001). Integration of topology and shape optimization for design of structural components. Industrial Applications and Design Cases Studies, Struct Multidisc Opti., 22, 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. G. and Liu, G. R. (2002). A point interpolation meshless method based on radial basis functions. Int. J. Numerical Method in Engineering, 54, 1623–1648.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Heo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heo, S.J., Kang, D.O., Lee, J.H. et al. Shape optimization of lower control arm considering multi-disciplinary constraint condition by using progress meta-model method. Int.J Automot. Technol. 14, 499–505 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-013-0054-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-013-0054-7

Key Words

Navigation