Skip to main content
Log in

Design methodology to reduce the chest deflection in US NCAP and EURO NCAP tests

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have not been many studies on the factors that affect chest deflection, although the US NCAP thoracic injury criterion was recently shifted from the 3-msec clip to chest deflection. This study explored these factors and proposed a design methodology for the factors to minimize chest deflection. Because injuries can become severe if the driver crashes against the vehicle interior, this study also sought a solution using a penalty function to prevent crashes with the interior and minimize injuries. First, a MADYMO model was made to simulate US NCAP and EURO NCAP tests by one-to-one and stochastic verifications. Second, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to find the major factors that affect chest deflection. Lastly, the factors identified via the sensitivity analysis were optimized to propose design guidelines that helped vehicles receive high star ratings in US NCAP and EURO NCAP tests and helped minimize the possibility of hard contact between the driver and the vehicle interior by utilizing a penalty function and the Taguchi method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augenstein, J. and Perdeck, E. (2005). The role of intrusion in injury causation in frontal crashes. SAE Paper No. 2005-01-1376.

  • Barman, A., Kodwani, R. and Siddegowda, N. (2008). Frontal crash and airbag deployment simulation using radios. Hyperworks Technology Conf..

  • Bass, C. R., Crandall, J. R., Dekel, E., Jordan, A. and Pilkey, W. D. (1997). A system for simulating structural intrusion in automobile full-frontal and frontal-offset crashes in the laboratory sled test environment. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 211, Part D, 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthet, F. (2005). Review of the Thorax Injury Criteria. APROSYS. D5.1.4.A. Part A.

  • Brumbelow, M. L. and Zuby, D. S. (2009). Impact and injury patterns in frontal crashes of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection. IIHS, No. 09-0257.

  • Chowdhury, R. and Adhikari, S. (2009). Stochastic sensitivity analysis using preconditioning approach. Int. J. Computer-Aided Engineering and Software 27,7, 841–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates Rodney, F. W., Janacek Gareth, J. and Lever Kenneth, V. (1988). Monte Carlo simulation and random number generation. IEEE 6, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eickhoff, B., Zellmer, H. and Forster, E. (2007). The mechanism of belt induced chest deflection: Analysis and possibilities for reduction. ESV, No. 07-0202.

  • EURO NCAP (2009). European New Car Assessment Program; Frontal Impact Testing Protocol. Version 5.0.

  • Foret-Bruno, J. Y., Trosseille, X., Page, Y., Huere, J. F. and Le Coz, J. Y. (2001). Comparison of thoracic injury risk in frontal car crashes for occupant restrained without belt load limiters and those restrained with 6 kN and 4 kN belt load limiters. Stapp Car Crash J., 45, 205–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2007). Response to NHTSA’s Request for Comments on the New Car Assessment Program; Suggested Approaches for Future Enhancement. Docket No. NHTSA-2006-26555.

  • Hynd, D., Carrol, J. A., Been, B. W. and Payne, A. R. (2004). Evaluation of the Shoulder, Thorax and Abdomen of the WorldSID Pre-Production Side Impact Dummy. Transport Research Laboratory. Published Project Report PPR 029.

  • Kim, T. W., Kim, H. H., Jeong, H. Y. and Jin, W. (2007). A stochastic analysis on frontal crash tests. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, Spring Conf. Proc., 4, 1897–1901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. W., Jeong, H. Y. and Jin, W. (2010). A stochastic analysis on variation in injury numbers at automobile frontal crash tests. Int. J. Automotive Technology 11,4, 481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laituri, T. R., Prasad, P., Kachnowski, B. P. and Sullivan, K. (2003). Prediction of AIS3+ thoracic risks for belted occupants in full engagements. Real World Frontal Impacts: Sensitivity to Various Theoretical Risk Curves, SAE 112,6, 1510–1529.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHTSA (2004). Frontal New Car Assessment Program. Docket No. NHTSA-2004-18765.

  • NHTSA (2006). Consumer Information; New Car Assessment Program. Docket No. NHTSA-2006-26555.

  • Noureddine, A., Eskandarian, A. and Digges, K. (2002). Computer modeling and validation of a hybrid III dummy for crashworthiness simulation. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 35,7, 885–893.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Petitjean, A., Baudrit, P. and Trosseille, X. (2003). Thoracic injury criterion for frontal crash applicable to all restraint systems. Stapp Car Crash J., 47, 323–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, R., Hoffmann, R. and Kamarajan, J. (2002). Application of Stochastic Simulation in the Automotive Industry. EASi Engineering GmbH.

  • Ross, M., Patel, D. and Wensel, T. (2006). Vehicle design and the physics of traffic safety. Physic Today, 59, 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, G. (1987). Introduction to Quality Engineering. American Supplier Institute, Inc., Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • TNO Automotive (2009a). MADYMO Database Manual, Release 7.1.

  • TNO Automotive (2009b). MADYMO Theory Manual, Release 7.1.

  • Wang, Q. and Gabler, H. C. (1998). Review of correlation methods for evaluating finite element simulations of impact injury risk. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, 44, 268–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, J., Roos, D., Riedel, J. and Bucker, C. (2009). Robustness analysis in stochastic structural mechanics. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 5,4, 287–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. -Y. Jeong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, W.M., Jeong, H.Y. Design methodology to reduce the chest deflection in US NCAP and EURO NCAP tests. Int.J Automot. Technol. 13, 765–773 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-012-0076-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-012-0076-6

Key Words

Navigation