Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consumption, savings and life satisfaction: the Turkish case

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impacts of seven different components of consumption expenditures, saving patterns on subjective well-being in Turkey. It relies on the “Life in Transition Survey,” which was conducted in late 2010 jointly by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank. The survey includes 1,003 observations from Turkey. Results show that, for the whole sample, different components of consumption expenditures have different effects on life satisfaction. Second, savings are associated with high levels of life satisfaction. Results vary when regressions run for age, gender and different standings on the income ladder categories independently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The terms “happiness,” “life satisfaction” and “subjective well-being” are used interchangeably throughout the paper.

  2. In economics, a direct cardinal measure of utility (subjective welfare approach) originated at Leyden University in the Netherlands in the early 1970s (see Van Praag 1968).

  3. The effect of using White’s correction is that, if the variance of the errors is positively related to the square of an explanatory variable, the standard errors for the slope coefficients are increased relative to the usual OLS standard errors, which would make hypothesis testing more conservative, so that more evidence would be required against the null hypothesis before it can be rejected.

  4. The main reason to take the natural log of consumption is to reduce skewness, so that measures of central tendency such as the median and mean are closer.

  5. According to WDH, between 2000 and 2009 the average happiness in Turkey was 5.6.

References

  • Argyle M (1999) Causes and correlates of happiness. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp 353–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Beerli A (2010) The evolution of durable goods demand during China’s transition. University of Zurich-Center for Institutions, Policy and Culture in the Development Process Working Paper Series, WP, 201

  • Bradshaw J, Mitchell D, Morgan J (1987) Evaluating adequacy: the potential of budget standards. J Soc Policy 16(2):165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AE, Oswald AJ (1996) Satisfaction and comparison income. J Public Econ 61:359–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeire T, Kalil A (2010) Does consumption buy happiness? Evidence from the United States. Int Rev Econ 57(2):163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 95:542–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman A, Jackson T (2008) Household energy consumption in the UK: a highly geographically and socio-economically disaggregated model. Energy Policy 36(8):3167–3182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumludag D (2013) Life satisfaction and income comparison effects in Turkey. Soc Indic Res 114(3):1199–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusenberry JS (1949) Income saving and the theory of consumer behaviors. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt AK (2006) Consumption and happiness: Alternative approaches, rough draft prepared for the conference on new directions in the study of happiness. University of Notre Dame, IN, 46556

  • Easterlin R (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? In: David PA, Reder MW (eds) Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honor of Moses Abramowitz. Academic Press Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey B, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit XL:402–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A (1985) Why do people save? Attitudes to, and habits of saving money in Britain. J Appl Soc Psychol 15(5):354–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdtham UG, Johannesson M (2001) The relationship between happiness, health, and socioeconomic factors: results based on Swedish micro data. J Socio-Econ 30:553–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokdemir O, Dumludag D (2012) Life satisfaction among Turkish and Moroccan immigrants in the Netherlands: the role of absolute and relative income. Soc Indic Res 106(3):407–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokdemir O, Tahsin E (2014) Factors that influence the life satisfaction of women living in the Northern Cyprus. Soc Indic Res 115(3):1071–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guven C (2012) Reversing the question: does happiness affect consumption and savings behavior? J Econ Psychol 33(4):701–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey B, Muffels R, Wooden M (2008) Money does not buy happiness: or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption. Soc Indic Res 87(1):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer N, Lehberger M, Musshoff O (2014) Happiness and utility in economic thought—or: what can we learn from happiness research for public policy analysis and public policy making? Soc Indic Res. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0654-2

  • Howell CJ, Howell RT, Schwabe KA (2006) Does wealth enhance life satisfaction for people who are materially deprived? Exploring the association among the Orang Asli of Peninsular Malaysia. Soc Indic Res 76(3):499–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamasb T, Meier H (2010) Household energy expenditure and income groups: evidence from Great Britain. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Wakker P, Sarin R (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Q J Econ 112(2):375–405 (In Memory of Amos Tversky 1937–1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball M, Willis R (2006) Utility and happiness. University of Michigan, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman E (1974) The determinants of national outlay on health. In: Perlman (ed) The economics of health and medical care. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard R, Mayraz G, Nickell S (2010) Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In: Diener E, Helliwell J, Kahneman D (eds) International differences in well-being. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear EP (1975) Education: consumption or production. N BER Working Paper No. 104

  • Luttmer E (2005) Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Q J Econ 120:963–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride M (2001) Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. J Econ Behav Organ 45(3):251–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer BD, Sullivan JX (2011) Viewpoint: further results on measuring the well-being of the poor using income and consumption. Can J Econ 44(1):52–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbakken R (1999) Price sensitivity of residential energy consumption in Norway. Energy Econ 21(6):493–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse JP (1977) Medical-care expenditure: a cross-national survey. J Human Resour 12(1):115–125

  • Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press, Washington, DC

  • Obućina O (2013) The patterns of satisfaction among immigrants in Germany. Soc Indic Res 113(3):1105–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald AJ (1997) Happiness and economic performance. Econ J 107:1815–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhm CJ (2003) Good times make you sick. J Health Econ 22:637–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senik C (2009) Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects. J Econ Behav Organ 72(1):408–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoorn A, Sent EM (2012) Consumer capital as the source of happiness: the missing economic theory underlying the income-happiness paradox. Nijmegen Center for Economics Institute for Management Research Working Papers, Radboud University Nijmegen

  • Van Praag BMS (1968) Individual welfare functions and consumer behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam

  • Van Praag BMS, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A (2004) Happiness quantified: a satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven R (1994) Is happiness a trait? Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Soc Indic Res 32:101–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven R (1997) Progres dans la comprehension du bonheur. Revue Que´be´coise de Psychologie 18:29–74

  • Veenhoven R (2004) Happiness as an aim in public policy. The greatest happiness principle. In: Linley A, Joseph S (eds) Positive psychology in practice. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 658–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendrik M (2013) Adaptation, anticipation and social interaction in happiness: an integrated error-correction approach. J Public Econ 105:131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozge Gokdemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gokdemir, O. Consumption, savings and life satisfaction: the Turkish case. Int Rev Econ 62, 183–196 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-015-0227-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-015-0227-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation