Abstract
The application in economics of methods and tools originally thought for other disciplines is not new. In this paper, we show how the compartmental approach, typical of Biology, Medicine, Chemistry, etc., can be used as a tool to represent the heterogeneity of the agents and introduce it into the dynamic models. We also show that in some cases, the subdivision of the agents into compartments can be useful for the government in order to obtain some results more efficiently. In this paper, the compartmental approach is applied to a macroeconomic model characterized by firms that may go bankruptcy whenever they are unable to repay their debts. Firms are grouped by size, and the consequences of these assumptions are analyzed, especially those regarding the policy implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It must be noted that Amos Tversky did not receive the Nobel Prize in 2002 together with D. Kanheman and V. Smith only because he was already dead.
See Weibull (1995) for a survey.
In their experiment, they moved from a situation in which the compartments are characterized by the same number of firms. Large firms become much more numerous than small firms as a consequence of the shock.
This is one of the main results obtained by Bischi et al. (1998).
We could endogenize this effect by letting the firms realize that they have power on the market price when they are just a few, permitting them to collude.
Note that the market situation after the application of the fiscal discount is very similar in the two cases, so the relevant differences in the fiscal revenues are those concerning the periods in which the measures are applied.
References
Aoki A (1996) New approaches to macroeconomic modeling: evolutionary stochastic dynamics, multiple equilibria, and externalities as field effects. Cambridge University Press, New York
Aoki A (2001) Modeling aggregate behavior and fluctuations in economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76(2):169–217
Becker GS (1973) A theory of marriage: part I. J Polit Econ 81(4):813–46
Becker GS (1974) A theory of marriage: part II. J Polit Econ 82(2):S11–S26
Bischi GI (1998) Compartmental analysis of economic systems with heterogeneous agents: an introduction. In: Kirman A, Gallegati M (eds), Beyond the representative agent. Elgar Pub. Co., Cheltenham Northampton, MA, pp 181–213
Bischi GI, Delli Gatti FD, Gallegati M (1998) Macroeconomic fluctuations and heterogeneous agents. In: Kirman A, Gallegati M (eds) Beyond the representative agent. Elgar Pub. Co., Cheltenham Northampton, MA, pp 215–232
Bischi GI, Tramontana F (2010) Three-dimensional discrete-time Lotka–Volterra models with an application to industrial clusters. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 15(10):3000–3014
Fortis M, Maggioni MA (2002) Comportamenti sinergici e concorrenziali nello sviluppo di cluster industriali: una modellizzazione ecologica ed alcune evidenze empiriche, in Complessità e distretti industriali: dinamiche, modelli, casi reali, Collana della fondazione Edison. Il Mulino, Bologna
Godfrey K (1983) Compartmental models and their applications. Academic Press, New York
Goodwin RM (1967) A growth cycle. In: Feinstein CH (eds), Socialism, capitalism and economic growth. University Press, Cambridge
Greenwald B, Stiglitz JE (1993) Financial market imperfections and business cycles. Q J Econ 108(1):77–114
Hommes C (2006) Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (eds) Handbook of computational economics, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1109–1186
Jacquez JA (1985) Compartmental analysis in biology and medicine, 2nd edn. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Jacquez JA, Simon CP (1993) Qualitative theory of compartmental systems. SIAM Rev 35(1):43–79
Jacquez JA, Simon CP (2002) Qualitative theory of compartmental systems with lags. Math Biosci 180(1–2):329–362
Kermack WO, McKendrick AG (1927) A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc Lond A 115:700–721
Kirman A (1993) Ants, rationality and recruitment. Q J Econ 108(1):137–156
Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton university Press, Princeton
Weibull JW (1995) Evolutionary game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgments
This research has been supported by the EU 7th “Monetary, Fiscal and Structural Policies with Heterogeneous Agents (POLHIA)” grant no. 225408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tramontana, F. Economics as a compartmental system: a simple macroeconomic example. Int Rev Econ 57, 347–360 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-010-0106-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-010-0106-5