Skip to main content
Log in

The Grace of the Flood: Classification and Use of Wild Mushrooms among the Highland Maya of Chiapas

  • Special Mushroom Issue
  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Grace of the Flood: Classification and Use of Wild Mushrooms among the Highland Maya of Chiapas. The highland Maya of Chiapas in southern Mexico gather, consume, and sell a wide variety of mushrooms during the rainy season from June to November. The mushrooms are prized as a valuable source of nutrition and income, and a few species are used medicinally. No evidence exists for current or historical use of hallucinogenic mushrooms, though descriptions of mushroom intoxication suggest nonspecific knowledge about the presence of psychoactive properties in some mushrooms. Free-listing exercises elicited 50 or more mushroom names in each of the two main highland Mayan languages, Tzeltal and Tzotzil. Identification exercises using mushroom photographs permitted a preliminary assignment of mycological species, genera, or families to many of the local mushroom names collected in free-lists. Field identification during the rainy reason further emphasized the concordance of many local names with distinctive mycological groups or taxa. Mushroom sketches made by informants revealed the detailed knowledge many of the highland Maya maintain about mushroom morphology, ecology, and diversity. Mayan mushroom classification provides additional evidence for several of the universally presumed principles of ethnobiological classification. However, in contrast to their classification of plants, the Mayan system of mushroom classification is mostly concerned with edible and other useful species. (One such species, previously unknown to science, is described here.) Most species with no cultural use are presumed by the highland Maya to be poisonous and are relegated to a wastebasket category known locally as “stupid” or “crazy” mushrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allan, K. 1977. Classifiers. Language 532:285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, D. 1986. Mushrooms Demystified. 2nd ed. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. All That the Rain Promises, and More...: A Hip-Pocket Guide to Western Mushrooms. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandala, V. M., L. Montoya, and I. H. Chapela. 1997. Wild Edible Mushrooms in Mexico: A Challenge and Opportunity for Sustainable Development. Pages 76–92 in M. E. Palm and I. H. Chapela, eds., Mycology in Sustainable Development: Expanding Concepts, Vanishing Borders. Parkway Publishers, Boone, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, D. R. 1995. Mushrooms: Poisons and Panaceas. W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. 1968. Tzeltal Numeral Classifiers: A Study in Ethnographic Semantics. Mouton, The Hague, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Biodiversity of Highland Maya Diet. Invited paper presented at the “Biodiversity and Health” symposium, American Anthropological Association Meetings, Philadelphia, November.

  • ——— and B. Berlin. 1996. Medical Ethnobiology of the Highland Maya of Chiapas, Mexico: The Gastrointestinal Diseases. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey:

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and E. Berlin. 2003. NGOs and the Process of Prior Informed Consent in Bioprospecting Research: The Maya ICBG Project in Chiapas, Mexico. International Social Science Journal 554:629–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, D. Breedlove, and P. Raven. 1974. Principles of Tzeltal Plant Classification: An Introduction to the Botanical Ethnography of a Mayan-Speaking People of Highland Chiapas. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breedlove, D. E. 1981. Flora of Chiapas, Part 1: Introduction to the Flora of Chiapas. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco.

  • ——— and R. M. Laughlin. 1993. The Flowering of Man: A Tzotzil Botany of Zinacantán. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology No. 35. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAvila, A. and G. Guzmán. 1980. Notes on the Ethnomycology of Hueyapan, Morelos, Mexico. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2:311–321.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R. F. 1979a. Introductory Essay. Pages 1–32 in R. F. Ellen and D. Reason, eds., Classifications and their Social Context. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979b. Omniscience and Ignorance: Variation in Nuaulu Knowledge, Identification, and Classification of Animals. Language in Society 8:337–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The Cultural Relations of Classification: An Analysis of Nuaulu Animal Categories from Central Seram. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Ethnomycology among the Nuaulu of the Moluccas: Putting Berlin’s “General Principles” of Ethnobiological Classification to the Test. Economic Botany 62(3).

  • Esquivel, A. M. 1998. Ethnomycology of Tlaxcala, Mexico. McIlvainea 132:6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garibay-Orijel, R., J. Caballero, A. Estrada-Torres, and J. Cifuentes. 2007. Understanding Cultural Significance, The Edible Mushrooms Case. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 3(4). http://www.ethnobiomed.com/ content/ 3/1/4.

  • Gonzalez-Elizondo, M. 1991. Ethnobotany of Southern Tepehuan of Durango, Mexico: I. Edible Mushrooms. Journal of Ethnobiology 112:165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, G. and F. Ramírez-Guillén. 2001. The Amanita caesarea Complex. Bibliotheca Mycologica 187:1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, J. W. Allen, and J. Gartz. 2000. The Neurotropic Mushrooms: A Worldwide Distribution, Analysis and Discussion. Annali dei Musei Civici di Rovereto 141998:189–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. 2003. When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunn, E. S. 1977. Tzeltal Folk Zoology: The Classification of Discontinuities in Nature. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification. American Anthropologist 844:830–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, D. Acuca Vasquez, and H. L. Avendano. 2000. Where Do Fungi Fit? The Fungal Domain in Mixtepec Zapotec. Presented to the Society of Ethnobiology Annual Meetings, Ann Arbor, Michigan, March 31.

  • INEGI. 2000. Anuário Estadístico: Chiapas. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, Mexico.

  • Kohler, U. 1980. Patterns of Interethnic Economic Exchange in Southeastern Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Research 363:316–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The Maya of Chiapas since 1965. Pages 179–206 in J. D. Monaghan, ed., Supplement to the Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 6. University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laferriere, J. E. 1991. Short Communication: Mountain Pima Ethnomycology. Journal of Ethnobiology 111:159–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampman, A. M. 2004. Tzeltal Ethnomycology: Naming, Classification and Use of Mushrooms in the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

  • ———. (2007a). General Principles of Ethnomycological Classification among the Tzeltal Maya of Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 27(1):11–27.

  • ———. (2007b). Ethnomycology: Medicinal and Edible Mushrooms of the Tzeltal Maya of Chiapas, México. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 9(1):1–5.

  • Laughlin, R. M. 1975. The Great Tzotzil Dictionary of San Lorenzo Zinacantán. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, No. 19. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

  • Loh, J. and D. Harmon. 2005. A Global Index of Biocultural Diversity. Ecological Indicators 53:231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma, D. L., J. L. Eberhart, and M. P. Amaranthus. 1997. Biodiversity of Ectomycorrhizal Types from Southwest Oregon. Pages 249–253 in T. N. Kaye, A. Liston, R. M. Love, D. L. Luoma, R. J. Meinke, and M. V. Wilson, eds., Conservation and Management of Native Plants and Fungi. Native Plant Society of Oregon, Corvallis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapes, C., G. Guzmán, and J. Caballero. 1981a. Elements of the Purepecha Mycological Classification. Journal of Ethnobiology 12:231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, ———. 1981b. Ethnomicología Purepecha: El conocimiento y uso de los hongos en la huenca de Pátzcuaro, Michoacán. SEP/UNAM, México D.F.

  • Martinez-Alfaro, M. N., E. Pérez-Silva, and E. Aguirre-Acosta. 1983. Etnomicología y exploraciones micológicas en la Sierra Norte de Puebla. Boletin Informativo Sociedad Mexicana de Micología 18:51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, O. K. and H. H. Miller. 2006. North American Mushrooms. The Globe Pequot Press, Guilford, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., P. Robles Gil, and C. G. Mittermeier. 1997. Megadiversity: Earth’s Biologically Wealthiest Nations. CEMEX, S.A., Mexico City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuno, T., G. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Kawagishi, T. Nishitoba, and J. Li. 1995. Reishi, Ganoderma lucidum and Ganoderma tsugae: Bioactive Substances and Medicinal Effects. Food Reviews International Special Issue “The Versatile Mushroom: Food and Medicinal Properties” 11:151–165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, A., N. Hernandez, C. Mapes, A. Kong and A. Estrada-Torres. 2008. The Collection and Sale of Wild Mushrooms in a Community of Tlaxcala, Mexico. Economic Botany 62(3).

  • Nigh, R. 2002. Maya Medicine in the Biological Gaze. Current Anthropology 43:451–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Moreno, J. and L. Villareal. 1988. Los hongos y myxomycetes del estado de Chiapas, Mexico: Estado actual de conocimiento y nuevos registros. Micología Neotropical Aplicada 1:97–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, M. Martínez-Reyes, A. Yescas-Pérez, A. D. Alvarado, and B. Xoconostle- Cázares. 2008. A Brief Look at the Wild Mushrooms and Mushroom Sellers of the Ozumba Market in Mexico. Economic Botany 62(3).

  • Pine, E., D. S. Hibbett, and M. J. Donoghue. 1999. Phylogenetic Relationships of Cantharelloid and Clavarioid Homobasidiomycetes Based on Mitochondrial and Nuclear rDNA Sequences. Mycologia 916:944–963.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robles Porras, L., M. Ishiki Ishihara, and R. Valenzuela. 2006. Inventario preliminar de los macromicetos en los Altos de Chiapas, México. Polibotánica 21:89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruán-Soto, F., R. Garibay-Orijel, and J. Cifuentes. 2006. Process and Dynamics of Traditional Selling Wild Edible Mushrooms in Tropical Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2:3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski, J. 1993. Diversity and Origins of Phanerogamic Flora of Mexico. Pages 129–148 in T. P. Ramamoorthy, A. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa, eds., Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saar, M. 1991. Mushrooms in Khanty Folk Medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 31:175–179.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, G. H., Jr. 1993. The Grace of the Flood: Mushrooms and Mayan Culture in Chiapas. Ethnographic film (20 min.) with D. Arora. Ethnographic Film Program, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.

  • ———. 1997. Noun Classification and Ethnozoological Classification in Machiguenga, an Arawakan Language of the Peruvian Amazon. The Journal of Amazonian Languages 1:29–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. and D. Arora. 1992. The Grace of the Flood: Naming and Use of Mushrooms among the Highland Maya of Chiapas. Paper presented at the III International Society of Ethnobiology Meetings, Mexico City, November.

  • ———. and Anderson, T. 1995. Zapatistas: Voices from the Edge of Revolution. Ethnographic film (50 min.). “Best Student Film,” American Anthropological Association Film Festival, November, 1995, with Ethnographic Film Program, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Tulloss, R. 2008. Notes on Amanita Section Caesareae, Torrendia and Amarrendia (Agaricales, Amanitaceae) with Provisional Division into Stirpes and World Key to Species of the Section. http://pluto.njcc.com/~ret/amanita/key.dir/hemibkey.pdf.

  • Van de Poll, R. V. 2004. Vegetation Analysis of the Horatio Colony Preserve. Report submitted to Colony Memorial Trust, Keene, New Hampshire. www.anei.org/download/94_vegexecsummary.pdf.

  • Wasson, R. G. 1957. Seeking the Magic Mushroom: A New York Banker Goes to Mexico’s Mountains to Participate in the Age-Old Rituals of Indians Who Chew Strange Growths That Produce Visions. Life 4219:100.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1961. The Hallucinogenic Mushrooms of Mexico: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Religious Idea among Primitive Peoples. Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University 19:137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962. The Hallucinogenic Mushrooms of Mexico and Psilocybin: A Bibliography. Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University 202:25–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Brent Berlin for first suggesting a study of highland Mayan ethnomycology during the early years of Shepard’s graduate studies at the University of California, and we thank both Brent and Elois Ann Berlin for their generosity and help facilitating the research project in all its phases. Thanks also go to Robert Laughlin for his important early work on Tzotzil ethnomycology, and for his kindness in hosting us during our first visit to San Cristóbal. We also thank Michelle Day, Kevin Groark, and Carol Karasik for their fine company during many a feast on mushrooms and other local delicacies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn H. Shepard Jr..

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

A New, Culturally Salient Species of Amanita

During this investigation, we encountered a large, striking edible amanita that is commonly gathered, sold, and consumed in and around San Cristóbal de las Casas, but is apparently undescribed. The name applied to this species in one Tzotzil Maya dialect is hayal yuy (or jayal yuy, depending on the phonetic alphabet used), meaning “thin amanita,” where hayal/jayal is the adjective “thin” and yuy is the Tzotzil folk genus name for Amanita in general and the A. caesarea complex in particular. Note that there are several slightly different phonetic alphabets used to write the highland Mayan languages and dialects. Some (see Laughlin 1975) have represented the aspirate consonant with an “h” as in English, while more recent and now standardized alphabets (see Berlin 1992; Breedlove and Laughlin 1993) use the Spanish “j” (as in “Juan,” “José”). In order to facilitate correct pronunciation for non-Spanish speakers, the former orthography is used to name the new species. The Tzotzil name, meaning “thin amanita,” is especially appropriate because this species and many of its close relatives in stirps Hemibapha are slimmer and thinner-fleshed than those of stirps Caesarea (see below).

Amanita hayalyuuy sp. nov. D. Arora & Shepard

Pileus convexus vel planus, saepe umbonatus, typice glandaceus centro fusciore et margine magis luteo et sulcato-striato. Contextus tenuis. Lamellae albae vel cremeae. Stipes typice longus, gracilis, aequalis, pallide luteolus, sub zonis fuscioribus, fibrillosisquamatis, typice annulo supero et volva ampla, alba, basali, saccata. Sporae ellipsoideae, inamyloideae, (8.6-) 9.3–11.7 (-14) × 6.2–7.8 (-9.3) µm; Q = 1.42 (1.29–1.69, n = 30, a typo mensa). In terra prope quercibus, Chiapas, Mexico. Typus hic designatus: UC 1860232 (San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas).

Pileus (cap) 8–18 (25) cm, convex becoming broadly convex to plane or with slightly uplifted, often splitting margin, the center usually with a low, broad umbo at maturity (Fig. 7); color typically golden-brown or bright yellow-brown as seen from a distance but actually darker brown (or at times olive or reddish) on the disc, much brighter in the mid-portion and paler still (yellow) at the margin. Surface slightly viscid or tacky when moist, typically bald, but occasionally with a thin patch of white universal veil tissue over the center, radially sulcate-striate from the margin inward, the striations typically 1–3 cm long; margin nonappendiculate. Context whitish to pale yellow, very thin at the margin, not staining appreciably when cut; odor mild, not distinctive. Lamellae (gills) off-white to cream-colored or pale yellow (not bright yellow), close, adnexed or free to narrowly adnate, with shorter truncate gills interspersed. Stipe typically long and relatively slender, 15–30 cm long when mature, and generally about 1–1.5 (2) cm thick, more or less equal or tapered slightly at the top; surface yellowish or cream-colored when fresh, but frequently decorated beneath the annulus with a darker orangish-brown to slightly reddish felty fibrillose layer (remnants of the inner layer of the universal veil) that frequently breaks up to form scaly, zigzagging zones (Fig. 8) around the stalk, these zones often discoloring with age or handling, and becoming duller and browner. Interior of stalk whitish to pale yellowish or cream-colored and hollow throughout or stuffed with a cottony white material. Partial veil typically forming a thin, superior, skirtlike yellowish annulus on the stalk that is striate on the upper surface and easily obliterated by handling. Universal veil white, forming an ample, sheathing, membranous, lobed saccate volva attached to the very base of the stalk; volva typically 2–5 cm high, often with a small limb (“limbus internus”) within it at the base of the stalk, but this feature not always well-developed.

Fig. 7.
figure 7

Amanita hayalyuy, type collection showing the pale gills and broad umbo at the center of the cap. (Photo: Brent Berlin, all rights reserved).

Fig. 8.
figure 8

Amanita hayalyuy in oak woodlands near the town of Teopisca. Note the tall stature when mature and the zigzag pattern of scales on the stalk. (Photo: David Arora, all rights reserved).

Spores white in mass; individual spores hyaline under the microscope, ellipsoid, apiculate, smooth, inamyloid, (8.6) 9.3–11.7 (14) × 6.2–7.8 (9.3) µm; Q = 1.42 (1.29–1.69), n = 30, as measured from the type. Pileipellis a trichodermium with some gelatinization at the surface. Basidia clavate, mostly 4-sterigmate, the bases with clamp connections. Subhymenium a thin (1–2 cell thick) layer of inflated cells. Gill trama bilateral. Tissue of the volva composed mainly of moderately branched, interwoven filamentous hyphae, but universal veil remnants on the surface of the stalk with large, swollen cells.

Collections Examined: UC 1860232 (holotype), bought in July in the main market of San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, by Brent Berlin, but originating in the nearby village of Chamula; UC 1860233 (paratype).

Habitat and Seasonality: Solitary or in small groups, on ground near or under oaks (Quercus spp.) at elevations of 2,000 m. and higher; common in the mountains surrounding San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico, and especially prominent in oak forests in the vicinity of the small towns of Chamula and Teopisca. It typically fruits from June to September but is most common in late June and July.

Comments: Amanita hayalyuy is one of the most salient edible mushrooms among the Tzotzil Maya of the Chiapas highlands. Within the large genus Amanita, this species clearly belongs to stirps Hemibapha of Section Caesareae as per Tulloss (2008). A. hayalyuy is close to A. arkansana Rosen. of the southeastern United States, but differs in its larger, ellipsoid (rather than broadly ellipsoid) spores and more prominently umbonate pileus (Fig. 7). The cap color varies somewhat but is usually yellow-brown, being yellowest at the prominently sulcate-striate margin and often darker (more olive or reddish) toward the center. It is easily distinguished from members of the A. caesarea complex (see Guzmán and Ramírez-Guillén 2001) by its yellow-brown rather than red-orange cap color, and its pale (never bright yellow) gills. Typically it is also taller, slimmer, and thinner-fleshed than species in the A. caesarea complex (referred to by the Tzotzil as “thick yuy,” “true yuy,” “yellow yuy,” or merely, yuy).

As there is considerable dialect variation for mushroom names, especially at the folk-species level, we expect that color distinctions (for example “red” vs. “yellow”) may also be used variably by other Tzotzil speakers to distinguish between A. caesarea, A. hayalyuy, and other edible amanitas. However, hayal yuy was the only local name we encountered that referred unambiguously to this species. We did not encounter this species while in the field with Tzeltal Mayan speakers, and thus did not register a proper Tzeltal folk-species name for it, but one or more names may certainly be in use. Since A. hayalyuy is a prominent commercial species in markets and roadside stands throughout the highlands of Chiapas (but especially in San Cristóbal and Comitán), it would be not be surprising to find it appreciated in the neighboring highland areas of Guatemala, at least where there are oaks. The taste of the cooked mushroom is much stronger than that of yuy, reminiscent of asparagus or fish. It is often roasted directly over the coals by the Tzotzil, the long stalk being used as a handle to manipulate it. It is also used in posole or soups, spiced with chili peppers and epazote (Chenopodium ambrosoides L.).

Appendix 2. Tzeltal mushroom names
Appendix 3. Tzotzil mushroom names
Appendix 4. Mushrooms identified from photographs in Arora (1991)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shepard, G.H., Arora, D. & Lampman, A. The Grace of the Flood: Classification and Use of Wild Mushrooms among the Highland Maya of Chiapas. Econ Bot 62, 437–470 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-008-9044-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-008-9044-5

Key Words

Navigation