Skip to main content
Log in

Traditional Tar Production from Cedrus libani A. Rich on the Taurus Mountains in Southern Turkey

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional Tar Production from Cedrus libani A. Rich on the Taurus Mountains in Southern Turkey. Cedrus libani A. Rich is a magnificent and sacred tree species native to the eastern Mediterranean region. Today, traditional people in southern Turkey produce wood extract, called katran, from C. libani, and use it to protect wooden structures against insects and fungi, to fight parasites and bacteria, and to heal wounds and cure various diseases in humans and domestic animals, both internally and externally. Here we illustrate traditional methods of producing katran, its use by local people, and its chemical composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Baser, K. H. C. and B. Demircakmak. 1995. The Essential Oil of Taurus Cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich): Recent Results. Chemistry of Natural Compounds 31:16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boydak, M. 2003. Regeneration of Lebanon Cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) on Karstic Lands in Turkey. Forest Ecology and Management 178:231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, W. R. and M. Basbous. 1978. The Cedars of Lebanon—Witnesses of History. Economic Botany 322:118–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digrak, M., A. Ilcim, and M. H. Alma. 1999. Antimicrobial Activities of Several Parts of Pinus brutia, Juniperus oxycedrus, Abies cilicia, Cedrus libani and Pinus nigra. Phytotherapy Research 13:584–587.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egenberg, I. M., A. K. Holtekjolen, and E. Lundanes. 2003. Characterization of Naturally and Artificially Weathered Pine Tar Coatings by Visual Assessment and Gas Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Cultural Heritage 4:221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafizoglu, H. 1987. Studies on the Chemistry of Cedrus libani A. Rich. I. Wood Extractives of Cedrus libani. Holzforschung 411:27–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hjulstrom, B., S. Isaksson, and A. Hennius. 2006. Organic Geochemical Evidence for Pine Tar Production in Middle Eastern Sweden during the Roman Iron Age. Journal of Archaeological Science 33:283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hus, S. 1945. Ormanlarımızdan katran ve zift cıkarılması imkanları (Possibilities of Katran and Pitch Production from Our Forests) (in Turkish). Orman ve Av 6: 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizil, M., G. Kizil, M. Yavuz, and C. Aytekin. 2002. Antimicrobial Activity of Resins Obtained from the Roots and Stems of Cedrus libani and Abies cilicia. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology 382:144–146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, J., U. Baumer, Y. Kaup, M. Schmid, and U. Weser. 2003. Analysis of a Pharaonic Embalming Tar. Nature 425:784.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loizzo, M. R., A. M. Saab, R. Tundis, G. A. Statti, I. Lampronti, F. Menichini, R. Gambari, J. Cinatl, and H. W. Doerr. 2008. Phytochemical Analysis and in vitro Evaluation of the Biological Activity against Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (HSV–1) of Cedrus libani A. Rich. Phytomedicine 151–2:79–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H. 1990. Mediterrane Zedernwälder. Pages 957–962 in N. Ozer, ed., International Cedar Symposium, Forest Research Institute, Antalya, Turkey, Miscellaneous Publications No. 59.

  • Qiao, C. Y., J. H. Ran, Y. Li, and X. Q. Wang, 2007. Phylogeny and Biogeography of Cedrus (Pinaceae) Inferred from Sequences of Seven Paternal Chloroplast and Maternal Mitochondrial DNA Regions. Annals of Botany 100:573–580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reunanen, M., R. Ekman, and H. Hafizoglu. 1996. Composition of Tars from Softwoods and Birch. Holzforschung 50:118–120.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saab, A. M., F. Y. Harb, and W. A. Koenig. 2005. Essential Oil Components in Heart Wood of Cedrus libani and Cedrus atlantica from Lebanon. Minerva Biotechnologica 173:159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. and S. Agarwal. 1988. Himachalol and Beta–Himachalene: Insecticidal Principles of Himalayan Cedarwood Oil. Journal of Chemical Ecology 144:1145–1151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H., A. Saklani, and B. Lal. 1990. Ethnobotanical Observations on Some Gymnosperms of Garhwal Himalaya, Uttar Pradesh, India. Economic Botany 44:349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesilada, E., I. Gurbuz, and H. Shibata. 1999. Screening of Turkish Anti–Ulcerojenic Folk Remedies for Anti–Heliobacter pylori Activity. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 66:289–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the people of Gecmen who demonstrated the traditional method of katran production and the Turkish Forest Service and staff from the District Office of the Cedar Research Forest in Elmali who provided us with logistical support and special permission to extract katran for research purposes. The study was partially supported by Akdeniz University Scientific Research Projects Unit. Dr. Roy Turkington (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada) helped us in editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kani Isik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurt, Y., Suleyman Kaçar, M. & Isik, K. Traditional Tar Production from Cedrus libani A. Rich on the Taurus Mountains in Southern Turkey. Econ Bot 62, 615–620 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-008-9023-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-008-9023-x

Key Words

Navigation